VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £146.90 Weekly Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977. The rent set is £146.90 per week, which includes certain service and fuel charges but excludes water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, specifically £146.90 per week in this case.

Topics

fair rentrent act 1977tenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £146.90 per week for an assured tenancy, excluding certain charges but including others.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £146.90 per week for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977, excluding water rates and council tax but including service and fuel charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CS/F77/2020/0016

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 18 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £146.90 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 02 September 2020

3. The amount for services is £52.88 Per Week

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is £9.66 Per Week

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply because 1st registration.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

-

[NAME] of decision 2 September 2020

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent for the premises was determined to be £146.90 per week.
  • The effective date for the new fair rent was set as 2 September 2020.
  • An amount of £52.88 per week was included for services.
  • An amount of £9.66 per week was included for fuel charges, not counting for rent allowance.
  • The rent was not to be registered as variable.
  • The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 did not apply because this was the first registration.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the fair rent for an assured tenancy at £146.90 per week.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the appropriate fair rent for the assured tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £146.90 per week, considering the relevant factors under the Rent Act 1977.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered on the calculation of the fair rent, taking into account various charges and exclusions.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, setting the fair rent as requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined similarly, considering the specifics of their tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the exact evidence or documents used.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.