VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £810 Per Month Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent of £810 per month for a tenant, following the guidelines set by the Rent Act 1977. This means the tenant will pay this amount each month, excluding certain costs like water and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their fair rent set according to the Rent Act 1977, specifically in this case where the rent was set at £810.00 per month.

Topics

fair renttenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The fair rent for the assured tenancy was set at £810.00 per calendar month, excluding water rates and council tax but including fuel charges.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £810 per month for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977, excluding water rates and council tax but including specified amounts for services and fuel charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AN/F77/2023/0107

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tribunal Judge H [NAME] [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £810.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 19 June 2023

3. The amount for services is NIL included Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

nil Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply because 1st registration 7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

Chairman H Lumby Date of decision 19 June 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a fair rent as defined by the Rent Act 1977.
  • The Tribunal sets a fair rent based on the Rent Act 1977.
  • The claim is brought under the jurisdiction of the Rent Act 1977.
  • The tenant's request for a fair rent is aligned with the legal framework of the Rent Act 1977.
  • The court recognizes the tenant's entitlement to a fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set a fair rent of £810.00 per month for an assured tenancy.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the fair rent for an assured tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the fair rent at £810.00 per month based on the Rent Act 1977.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Rent Act 1977 to determine the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, setting the fair rent as requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents used.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.