VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent of £890 for tenant

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £890 for a tenant, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges. This decision was made under the Rent Act 1977.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair renttenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a fair rent of £890 for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AE/F77/2021/0245

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Judge [NAME]

Landlord [NAME]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £890.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 29 September 2021

3. The amount for services is £45.47 Per Calendar Month

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

5. The rent is to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply because the registered rent is below the cap.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £1033.70 per Calendar Month prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Judge Daley Date of decision 29.09.21

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a fair rent set by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No specific factors identified as all cases favored the claimant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set a fair rent of £890 for a tenant, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977, setting a fair rent that is reasonable for both the tenant and the landlord.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Rent Act 1977 to determine a fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that is reasonable.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the Rent Act 1977 when seeking a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the property and the rental agreement were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.