VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided the fair rent for a rental property under the Rent Act 1977. The tenant's fair rent was set at £138 per week, excluding water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their fair rent determined by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

rent controlfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, setting it at £138 per week excluding water rates and council tax. The decision was based on Schedule 11 of the Rent Act.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00EH/F77/2025/0040

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were

35 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

J A Platt J Fraser

Landlord [COMPANY]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £138 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 9 January 2026

3. The amount for services is £70.82 Per Week

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

Chairman J A Platt FRICS, FIRPM Date of decision 9 January 2026

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects market conditions adjusted for specific property characteristics.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and location, adjusted according to statutory formulas.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current state and location of their property, adjusted for improvements made by the tenant.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects market values adjusted for specific tenancy terms.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in the dispute over the fair rent of a rental property.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal decided based on Schedule 11 of the Rent Act 1977, which sets out how to determine fair rents.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Schedule 11 of the Rent Act 1977 was used to set the fair rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The application of Schedule 11 of the Rent Act 1977 was central to determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant, setting a fair rent under the law.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a similar issue can seek a determination from the First-tier Tribunal to set their fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The specific details of the property and rental agreement were likely considered by the Tribunal.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can usually be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.