VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £760 PCM

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the fair market rent at £760 per month after considering both landlord and tenant evidence. The decision was influenced by improvements made during tenancy and similar rental prices in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair and reasonable market rent adjustment based on improvements made during tenancy.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to propose increases in rent under specific conditions. It outlines the procedures for serving notices to tenants regarding rent increases and specifies the minimum periods after which these increases can take effect.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

This section of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 implies a covenant by the lessor to keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, along with certain installations for utilities and heating, in repair and proper working order. However, the lessor is not required to perform repairs that would affect parts of the building outside the dwelling-house unless those parts directly impact the tenant's enjoyment of the property.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a semi-detached rural property in Shropshire, adjusting for tenant improvements.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a market rent of £760 pcm for a semi-detached rural property in Shropshire, adjusting the proposed rent based on tenant improvements and comparable properties.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference BIR/00GG/MNR/2024/0642

[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME]. [COUNSEL] & Mrs [COUNSEL]

Tenant’s Representative

Landlord Mr [COUNSEL] & Mrs [COUNSEL]. [COUNSEL]

Landlord’s Address

Landlord’s Representative

Date of Application

27 November 2024 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members Judge D Barlow – Chair T. Wyn Jones MRICS

Date of Decision

15 April 2026 Rent Determined £ 760.00 per calendar month

Date the new rent takes effect

21 December 2024

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 20 November 2024, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,290.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £650.00 pcm to take effect from 21 December 2024.

2. On 27 November 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 21 June 2010 for a term expiring on 31 January 2011. The rental period during the statutory continuance is monthly.

4. The Tenants vacated the property on 21 February 2025.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

5. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Liability for Council Tax

6. The Tenants are responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property.

Inspection/Hearing

7. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of an inspection on 19 August 2025, an oral hearing on 18 March 2026 at Welshpool Magistrates Court attended by both parties, the submissions and evidence provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

The Property

8. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the Property on 19 August 2025 in the presence of the Landlord. The Tenants were notified of the inspection but did not attend.

3

9. The Property is a semi-detached rural property offering the following accommodation:

Portch, open plan kitchen/diner, living room, study, ground floor WC, three bedrooms, and bathroom with full suite including shower.

Outside: Garden to side and rear, workshop, three storerooms and a garden room in a separate block.

The Property is heated by a dual fuel wood burner. Water is supplied by a spring and heated by the wood burner or immersion heater. Drainage is by septic tank.

The Property is in an elevated rural position in Shropshire with views over surrounding countryside. It is approached over a private unmetalled road and is approximately 12 miles from Shrewsbury and 9 miles from Welshpool.

Evidence

10. Both the Tenant and the Landlord filed written submissions and gave oral evidence at the hearing.

The Tenant.

11. The Tenant made improvements to the property during the tenancy. A list of [] items was provided by the Tenant. The Landlord claimed to have paid for materials in respect of some items and compensated the Tenant in respect of the garden decking left behind. By the date of the hearing the parties had agreed the list of improvements and the extent of the Landlord’s contributions to them.

Photographic evidence of damp issues in one bedroom was noted. On inspection no damp was apparent.

12. The tenant did not provide comparables but made some submissions on the relevance of the Landlords evidence on valuation.

The Landlord

13. The Landlord also made improvements to property during the tenancy including roofing and damp proofing works.

14. The comparables provided by the Landlord include:

4

a) 3 bedroom semi-detached house, [ADDRESS], Shrewsbury. This is marketed at £1,380pcm from 29 Aug 2024 to 9 Sep 2024. b) 3 bedroom semi-detached house, [ADDRESS] marketed from 17 Jul2023 to 24 Sep 2024 at £1,295pcm. c) 3 bedroom semi-detached house [ADDRESS] Heath marketed Nov 2024 for £1,250 pcm d) 3 bedroom semi-detached house, [ADDRESS], Bicton Heath, marketed Aug-Oct 2024 for £1.250 pcm e) 3 bedroom semi-detached house, [ADDRESS], Shrewsbury, marketed at £1200pcm from Aug 2024 to Sep 2024. f) 3 bedroom semi-detached house, [ADDRESS], Bicton Heath, marketed Oct 2024 for £1.200 pcm g) 3 bedroom semi-detached house, [ADDRESS], marketed Oct 2024 for £1,100 pcm h) 3 bedroom semi-detached house, Gate Farm, Trewern, marketed Aug-Oct 2024 for £895.00 pcm i) 3 bedroom semi-detached house, [ADDRESS], Westbury, marketed Oct 2024 £824pcm j) 3 Bedroom semi-detached house, Maes Hafren, [ADDRESS] marketed Jul-Aug 2-24 for £825pcm k) 3-bedroom semi-detached house, Llanfechain marketed from 26 October 2024 for £1,500pcm

Determination and Valuation

15. With the exception of the properties listed at (h), (i), (j) and possibly (k), the Tribunal do not consider the comparables provided by the Landlord relevant to this matter, they all show the rent sought, not the rent achieved. Apart from possibly (k) they are not in a rural location, and therefore much closer to local amenities. The submissions provided by the Tenant on the Landlord’s valuations was considered generally to be of use.

16. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area as at the valuation date (21 December 2024), and the relevant comparables provided by the Landlord. The Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property as at the valuation date, would be in the order of £ 800.00pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties.

17. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustment of £40.oo per month in relation to the agreed list of improvements carried out by the Tenant for which

5

they should not pay. The adjustment of £40.00 takes account of the Landlords agreed contribution of materials for some of the improvements.

The full valuation is:

Starting Rent

£800.00pcm

Less

Adjustment for improvements

£40.00

Market rent

£760.00 pcm

Decision

12. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £760.00 per calendar month with effect from 21 December 2024.

APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area to determine the market rent.
  • The Tribunal adjusted the rent downwards to account for improvements made by the tenant.
  • The Landlord's contributions to materials for some tenant improvements were factored into the rent adjustment.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal set a fair market rent of £760 pcm for a rural property.

Who was involved?

A tenant and landlord were involved, with the tenant challenging the proposed rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered comparable rental prices in the area and adjustments for improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied to determine market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The evidence on comparable rental prices and adjustments for tenant improvements was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision supported the tenant's position, setting a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone challenging an unfair rent increase may benefit from presenting comparable rental prices and improvements made during tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographic evidence of property condition, lists of tenant improvements, and comparables provided by both parties were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal the decision on points of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.