First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered comparable evidence and the property's condition, setting the rent at £795 per month starting January 7, 2024.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may seek to increase the rent of an assured periodic tenancy if the proposed rent reflects the open market value.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent that a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy excluding the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and the property's condition. The rent was set at £795 per month, effective from January 7, 2024.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/18UC/MNR/2024/0010
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 795.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 07 January 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 07 April 2017
5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months
6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises The property is converted second floor flat which forms part of a three storey end of terrace Victorian building. Accommodation comprises: bedroom, living room bathroom, communal garden with cycle store.
[NAME] of Decision 10 May 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CHI/18UC/MNR/2024/0010 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : None Respondent : [redacted] : None Type of [NAME] : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Miss [NAME] : Paper determination Date of decision : 10th May 2024
DECISION
2 Decision of the tribunal (1) The Tribunal determines that the rent that the property in its current condition as at the 7th January 2024 might reasonably be expected to achieve in the open market under an assured tenancy is £795 per month Background 1. The tenant has lived in the property as assured periodic tenant since 7th April 2017 with an agreement of that date at a commencing rent of £650 per month.
2. On the 16th November 2023 the landlord served a notice pursuant to section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 seeking to increase the rent from £720 per month to £795 per month, being an increase of £75 effective from 7th January 2024.
3. By an [NAME] dated 6th January 2024, the tenant referred that notice to the Tribunal for a determination of the market rent. The Tribunal issued Directions for the conduct of the matter on 24th January 2024.
4. On the 26th February 2024 the Tenant submitted a Case Management [NAME] for postponement of the case due to his medical condition. The Tribunal duly granted an extended deadline of the 29th April 2024 for receipt of evidence. None, however, was received.
5. The Tribunal considered the matter suitable for a determination on the papers and therefore a hearing was not necessary. The parties did not disagree with this arrangement. The Evidence 6. The Tribunal has before it a bundle of evidence which includes a background to the case, the [NAME], the directions, the tenancy agreement and a completed rent appeal statement on behalf of the landlord only. This statement included photographic evidence showing the condition of the flat together with a floor plan. In addition, the Landlord submitted details of comparable evidence and more about this is stated below. Inspection 7. The Tribunal did not inspect the property and relied on the information provided by the parties, Rightmove, [ADDRESS] and its expert knowledge. The property is a converted second floor flat which forms part of a three storey end of terrace Victorian building.
3 8. The accommodation comprises: bedroom, living room, kitchen, shower room. There is double glazing and gas central heating. There is a communal courtyard garden and bike store. Carpets, curtains, and white goods are provided by the landlord. The Law 9. The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration. The valuation 10. Having carefully considered all the evidence from the Landlord the Tribunal considers that the rent that would be achieved in a good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom fittings, modern services, carpets, curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £795 per month. This figure is based upon the comparable evidence and analysis provided by the Landlord and the Tribunal’s professional judgement and experience.
11. The Tribunal found no reason to adjust this rent to allow for the condition to the fabric of the building, internal condition of the property and services. 12 The average rent for properties in the Exeter area has increased every quarter since the end of 2019, according to the online property portal Rightmove. The rent increases are due to too few properties coming to the market in order to meet demand resulting in the number of homes for rent now being 46 per cent below 2019 levels. These factors which are adversely affecting the property market help put the Tribunal’s decision in context.
13. The Tribunal has been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement, which incorporates the usual repair obligations.
14. The Tribunal received no evidence of hardship from the Tenant and, therefore, the rent determined by the tribunal is to take effect from 7th January 2024.
4
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy at £775
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Sheltered Housing Tenants
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Adjusted Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The proposed rent reflects the open market value.
- Rent adjustments are based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- Rent determinations reflect the property's market value and condition.
- Fair rent assessments are made based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- Rent adjustments are made under the Housing Act 1988.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £795 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable evidence and the property's condition, ensuring the rent reflects the open market value.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's condition and market value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord, as the rent increase was approved.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should gather comparable evidence to support their case for rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographic evidence, a rent appeal statement, and details of comparable properties mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation.
