VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £1400 per month starting from 8 September 2023. The decision was based on the open market value of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the open market value of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar periodic tenancy. The determination considers the open market value of the property, excluding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1400 per month, effective from 8 September 2023, after considering the open market value of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00BC/MNR/2023/0383

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 28 [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1400 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 8 September 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 8 December 2018

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement s11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord One double bed, wardrobe, chest of drawers. Two small side cabinets.

9. Description of premises First floor purpose built maisonette with 2 bedrooms, reception room kitchen and bathroom

[NAME] of Decision 4 December 2023

1

Case Reference

: HS/LON/00BC/MNR/2023/0383

Property : 28 [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 21 August 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] chair

Date of Summary Reasons

: 4 December 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1400 per calendar month with effect from 8 September 2023. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On 26 July 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 1450.00 in place of the existing rent of £ 1175.00 per month to take effect from 8 September 2023

2. On 21 August 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 21 August 2023.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property.

Evidence

4. There were no written submissions from the parties.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property its current condition would be in the region of £1400.00 per calendar month. The tribunal made no further adjustments in the absence of any evidence.

Decision

6. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1400.00 per calendar month.

7. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1400.00 to take effect on 8 September 2023 This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. Chairman: [NAME]: 4 December 2023

3 APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is determined according to the open market value of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
  • Comparable evidence and expert knowledge reflecting the open market value are used to adjust the rent.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord determines a new rent without proving it reflects the open market value through comparable evidence and expert knowledge.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1400 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the open market value of the property, as there were no written submissions from the parties.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the open market value of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a determination of market rent if they believe the rent is unfair.

What evidence or documents mattered?

No written submissions were provided, so the decision was based on the tribunal's own expert knowledge.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the details of how to appeal are set out in the full reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.