Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1,550 per month, effective from September 9, 2023, after considering the open market value of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the open market value of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar periodic tenancy. The determination takes into account the periods of the existing tenancy and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match those of the original, except for the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £1,550 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 9 September 2023, based on the open market value of the property in the Finchley area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/MNR/2023/0368
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 43 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] 13 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,550 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 9th September 2023
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 9th May 2020
6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord In accordance with schedule provided in tenant’s application
9. Description of premises A ground floor purpose built flat forming part of a two-storey building. Accommodation comprises 2 bedrooms, kitchen, bathroom/wc, with gas central heating.
[NAME] of Decision 28TH November 2023
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOAC/MNR/2023/0368
Property : 43 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] c/o [NAME] of Objection : 21 August 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 28 November 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1550 per calendar month with effect from 9 September 2023. ___________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On the 31 July 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,550 per month in place of the existing rent of £1225 per month to take effect from 9 September 2023. The existing rent was that set out in the tenancy agreement which commenced on the 9th May 2020.
2. On the 21 August 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The parties considered this matter could be undertaken without an inspection.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has had consideration to the written submissions provided by the Landlord together with the comparable evidence.
Determination and Valuation
5. Having consideration of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Finchley area, we consider that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, double glazing, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £1,550 per month.
6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,550 per calendar month.
Decision
7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,550 per calendar month.
8.The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,550 to take effect on the 9 September 2023. This, being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship.
3
Chairman: [NAME]: 28 November 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £1050 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £900 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant requests that the rent be set according to the open market value of the property.
- The tenant refers the landlord's rent proposal to the Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.
- The tenant seeks a fair and reasonable rent level based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant asks for a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
- The tenant demands that their rent be determined according to the open market value of the property.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new market rent of £1,550 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property in the Finchley area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the open market value of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also have their rent determined based on the open market value of their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions and comparable evidence were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
