VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the rent at £1350.00 per month starting from August 13, 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the open market value of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar periodic tenancy. The new rent must start at the beginning of the next rental period after the application.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1350.00 per calendar month, effective from 13 August 2024, following a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/18UH/MNR/2024/0174

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [NAME] 37 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mr & Mrs [NAME] [RESPONDENT] 40 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1350.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13 August 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 13 May 1996

5. Length of the term or rental period Assured periodic tenancy

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a

8. Description of premises 5-bedroom house Edwardian semi detached

[NAME] of Decision 14 October 2024

1

Case Reference

: CHI/18UH/MNR/2024/0174

Property : [NAME], 37 Higher Brimley, Teignmouth, Devon, TQ14 8Ju

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : A&G Pengelly C/O Lettings & Property Management

Date of Objection : 1 August 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 14 October 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

_______________________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1350.00 per calendar month with effect from 13 August 2024. ____________________________________

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 4 June 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1570.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1350.00 per month to take effect from 13 August 2024.

2. On 1 August 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. The tenant occupies the property by way of an Assured Tenancy which commenced in May 1996. The exact date of occupation in May 1996 was unproven by either party in the absence of a copy of the tenancy agreement. The Tribunal decision from the last determination in 2023, case CHI/ 18UH/MNR/2023/0172, dated 21 September 2023, stated the rent date was commonly agreed as the 13th of the month. This previous case was referred to in the Tenant’s Representative’s submissions as a source of the rent commencement date in this case. The date noted was 16 May and the Tenant contended the Notice of Increase of Rent was therefore invalid, as the Notice stated the 13th of the month. Given the previous decision and the citing of it as a source of the evidence of the rental commencement date, the Tribunal adopts 13th of the Month as the rent commencement date and so considers the Notice appears valid and the Tribunal can go on to determine the rent under section 13 and 14.

5. Accommodation comprises an entrance hall, reception room, living room, kitchen and dining area at ground level; four bedrooms and a bathroom with separate WC at first floor level, and a bedroom and bathroom on the second floor. The Tribunal note that the landlord refers to the top floor comprising a king-sized bedroom with ensuite and a further single bedroom whereas the tenant says there is only one bedroom and ensuite WC and sink. The Tribunal has considered the house as a five-bedroom property and that a small sixth

3 bedroom or box room on the top floor would not materially affect the value. The property has a sizeable garden and off-road parking at the rear.

Determination and Valuation 6. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £1350.00 per calendar month.

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1350.00 per calendar month.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1350.00 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1350.00 per calendar month to take effect on 13 August 2024, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market comparables.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction if the property is in disrepair.
  • The tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property is not in good contemporary letting condition.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on the fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and the Tribunal's own knowledge of rental values in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically Section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of rental values in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined based on the open market value of the property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence provided by both parties was important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but a request for full reasons must be made first.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.