VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Disrepair

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided to reduce the proposed rent because the property had disrepair issues. The rent was set at £1305 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent reduction if the property is below good tenantable condition due to disrepair issues.

Topics

rent determinationdisrepair issuesgood tenantable condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and the terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a reduced rent after considering the property's condition and disrepair issues.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a rent of £1305 per month, reducing the landlord's proposed rent due to disrepair issues in the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/OOAD/MNR/2024/0604

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 102 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT] and [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1305 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 September 2024

*3. The amount included for services is

not applicable n/a Per n/a

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 17 February 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period To 17 February 2024 (inclusive)

7. Allocation of liability for repairs landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a white goods by landlord

9. Description of premises Ground floor

[NAME] of Decision 3 December 2024

MR22

Case Reference

: LON/OOAD/MNR/2024/0604

Property : 102 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Miss [APPELLANT] & [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 6 August 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 03 December 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1305 per calendar month with effect from 18 September 2024. ____________________________________

SUMMARY REASONS

Background S E C FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

MR22 1. On 22 July 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1500 per month in place of the existing rent of £1225 per month to take effect from 18 September 2024.

2. An application dated 6 August 2024 was made under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 6 August 2024.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property. The Tribunal relied on the papers submitted and identified the property as ground floor flat with a living room, a kitchen, one master bedroom, one children's bedroom, bathroom and entrance corridor.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the parties.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1450 per calendar month.

Decision 6. The Tribunal considered what discount was applicable, if any, to take account of any repairs that rendered the property below good tenantable condition. The property is not centrally heated and has from the evidence of the Applicants some disrepair issues and the tribunal applies a discount of 10%. The tribunal therefore determined a rent of £1305 per month.

7. No application was made for hardship and so the effective date of the increase is date specified in the Landlords Notice with is 18 September 2024.

8. The Tribunal therefore determines the new rent of £1305 per month to take effect on 18 September 2024.

Chairman: [NAME]:

3 December 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

MR22

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined a rent of £1305 per month, considering a discount for disrepair issues.
  • The property's lack of central heating and other disrepair issues justified a 10% discount on the market rent.
  • The open market rent for the property in good condition was estimated to be £1450 per month.
  • The new rent took effect on September 18, 2024, as specified in the landlord's notice, because no hardship application was made.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided to reduce the proposed rent to £1305 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and disrepair issues.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the disrepair issues.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be entitled to a rent reduction if their property has disrepair issues.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions and evidence of disrepair issues mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if either party disagrees with the outcome.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.