First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
In this case, a tenant challenged a landlord's proposed rent increase. After reviewing written submissions from both sides, the First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £1,200 per month, which was lower than what the landlord had requested.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant may refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal for determination of a fair market rent.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on certain conditions, including the nature of the tenancy and the terms agreed upon.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, rejecting the landlord's proposed increase and setting a lower rent based on written submissions from both parties.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HD/MNR/2021/0077
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 89 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Ms [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1200.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17 August 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 July 2020
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Modern semi-detached house.
[NAME] of Decision 9 September 2021
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HD/MNR/2021/0077 Property :
89 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord : Ms [COUNSEL] :
None
Tenant : [NAME] : None Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Decided on the papers Date of Decision :
9th September 2021
DECISION
CHI/00HD/MNR/2021/0077
2
Summary of Decision
1. On 9th September 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per month to take effect from 17th August 2021.
Background
2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 14th July 2021 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,650 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,050 per month to take effect from 17th August 2021. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 20th July 2021 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 2nd August 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. Both parties submitted detailed papers by the specified dates very clearly setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party. A Tribunal was arranged for 9th September 2021 using video conferencing.
The Property
8. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a modern semi-detached house in an area of mainly residential properties about ½ mile south of the centre of Yate and one mile southwest of the centre of Chipping Sodbury. All main amenities are within reasonable distance.
9. The accommodation includes a Lounge/Diner, Kitchen, Utility/Cloakroom, three Bedrooms and a Bathroom with WC. There is a garden, shed and parking. Carpets, and white goods are all included. Both parties claim to have provided curtains although the Tenant confirms that the blinds to the single bedroom, bathroom and kitchen are provided by the Landlord as is the cloakroom curtain.
CHI/00HD/MNR/2021/0077
3 10. The property has double-glazed windows and gas-fired central heating, although there have been some repair issues in the months leading up to the application. The Tribunal expects this to be repaired in the normal course of events.
Submissions
11. The initial tenancy began on 18th July 2020 at a rent of £1,050. The Landlord states that she accepted a low rent at that time due to Covid restrictions.
12. The Landlord states that the property was refurbished in 2018 including a new kitchen, new floorings, new boiler and bathroom suite.
13. Both parties submitted a range of photographs and asking prices for similar properties to let in the general area. The Tenants indicate that they would like to remain at the property.
The Law
S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME]; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement-
CHI/00HD/MNR/2021/0077
4 (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation
14. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
15. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the parties are not relevant to this issue.
16. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Chipping Sodbury and Yate the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,200 per month.
CHI/00HD/MNR/2021/0077
5 17. The Tribunal considered that the property was in the condition that would be expected for a new open market letting and that there should be no adjustments to this rent.
18. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.
Determination
19. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,200 per month.
20. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,200 per month should take effect from 17th August 2021 this being the date specified in the original notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets new market rent for property based on condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Tenant Imp…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per month.
- The new rent was set to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's original notice.
- The Tribunal was able to decide the case fairly based solely on the submitted written papers.
- The property was considered to be in the expected condition for a new open market letting, requiring no rent adjustments.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed new rent of £1,650 per month was not accepted.
- The landlord's claim of accepting a low rent previously due to Covid restrictions was not a factor in the market rent determination.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £1,200 per month for the assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on written submissions from both parties, considering the current market conditions and the property's characteristics.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's characteristics and rental values with similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, who successfully challenged the landlord's proposed rent increase.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can challenge a landlord's proposed rent increase by referring it to the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and asking prices for similar properties in the area were important evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
