First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1800 per month, taking into account the terms of the tenancy and the open market value of similar properties.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open market rent, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and the conditions under which a willing landlord would let the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy to be £1800 per month, considering the terms of the tenancy and the open market value.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 15 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT] 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 02 October 2020
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable n/a Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 19/8/2011
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant to keep interior in repair, fair wear and tear excepted subject to Ss 11 and 12 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Large sofa, small cabinet and small bookshelf. No inventory provided
9. Description of premises mid terrace house circa 1980 with 3 bedrooms 2 reception rooms kitchen and bathroom/wc
Chairman A [NAME] of Decision 2 October 2020
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AM/MDR/2020/0002
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AM/MDR/2020/0002 Property : 15 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : In Person Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : Mr A [NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 2 October 2020 Date of decision : 2 October 2020
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1800.00 (one thousand eight hundred pounds) per calendar month. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. (3) The case has been determined on the papers and evidence put forward by the parties. The property was not inspected. The [NAME]
1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice by the landlord proposing a rent increase to £2400.00 per month. Background 2. On 10 February 2020 the landlord served a notice of rent increase proposing a new rent of £1560.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1410.00 per month. The starting date for the new rent would be 19 March 2020.
3. On 9 March 2020 the tenant, Ms [APPELLANT], made an [NAME] to this tribunal challenging the increase. The property 4. The subject property is a 3 Storey mid-terrace house with 2 living room, 3 bedrooms, bathroom and kitchen.
5. Under the terms of the tenancy the tenant is to keep the interior of the property and contents in a clean condition and repair as at the commencement of the tenancy, fair wear and tear excepted. The landlord is responsible for repairs under sections 11 and 12 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. The tenant’s evidence 6. The tenants have submitted an [NAME] to the tribunal and correspondence relating to the Landlords desire to retake possession of the house. The tribunal has no jurisdiction over this.
7. No rental evidence has been put forward
The landlord’s case 8. The bundle includes various documents showing the Landlord is seeking possession of the house. This is not a matter over which the tribunal has any jurisdiction.
9. No rental comparable evidence has been put before the tribunal The Law 10. The Tribunal must first determine that the landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.
11. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
12. In so doing the Tribunal, is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Any improvements made during the previous regulated tenancy are no longer disregarded. Valuation 13. In the absence of any rental evidence put forward by both parties, the tribunal relies its own knowledge and experience.
14. The tribunal considers that if let in the open market on the terms of the tenancy, the property would achieve a rent of £1800 per calendar month.
Effective date 15. Under s14 (7) of the Housing Act 1988 the effective date of the decision would normally be the date shown on the [NAME] unless there is hardship to the tenant. 16. On the evidence submitted by the tenant, the tribunal finds evidence of hardship and therefore the effective date of the decision is the date of the decision which is 2 October 2020.
Name: [NAME] [NAME]:19 November 2020
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Property Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,350
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Retirement Living Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for London Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Statutory Periodic Tena…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined the market rent to be £1800 per month.
- The tribunal relied on its own knowledge and experience to determine the rent.
- The tribunal found evidence of hardship for the tenant, making the decision effective immediately.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set the market rent for the property at £1800 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the terms of the tenancy and the open market value of similar properties.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the open market value of similar properties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the open market value of their property when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence and documents related to the terms of the tenancy and the open market value of similar properties mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
