VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £1800/Month Rent for Assured Tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1800 per month, taking into account the terms of the tenancy and the open market value of similar properties.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination under the Housing Act 1988, s.14, which in this case was set at £1800 per month.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open market rent, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and the conditions under which a willing landlord would let the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy to be £1800 per month, considering the property's characteristics and the lack of comparable rental evidence.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy to be £1800 per month, considering the terms of the tenancy and the open market value.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 15 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT] 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 02 October 2020

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 19/8/2011

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant to keep interior in repair, fair wear and tear excepted subject to Ss 11 and 12 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Large sofa, small cabinet and small bookshelf. No inventory provided

9. Description of premises mid terrace house circa 1980 with 3 bedrooms 2 reception rooms kitchen and bathroom/wc

Chairman A [NAME] of Decision 2 October 2020

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AM/MDR/2020/0002

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AM/MDR/2020/0002 Property : 15 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : In Person Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : Mr A [NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 2 October 2020 Date of decision : 2 October 2020

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1800.00 (one thousand eight hundred pounds) per calendar month. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. (3) The case has been determined on the papers and evidence put forward by the parties. The property was not inspected. The [NAME]

1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice by the landlord proposing a rent increase to £2400.00 per month. Background 2. On 10 February 2020 the landlord served a notice of rent increase proposing a new rent of £1560.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1410.00 per month. The starting date for the new rent would be 19 March 2020.

3. On 9 March 2020 the tenant, Ms [APPELLANT], made an [NAME] to this tribunal challenging the increase. The property 4. The subject property is a 3 Storey mid-terrace house with 2 living room, 3 bedrooms, bathroom and kitchen.

5. Under the terms of the tenancy the tenant is to keep the interior of the property and contents in a clean condition and repair as at the commencement of the tenancy, fair wear and tear excepted. The landlord is responsible for repairs under sections 11 and 12 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. The tenant’s evidence 6. The tenants have submitted an [NAME] to the tribunal and correspondence relating to the Landlords desire to retake possession of the house. The tribunal has no jurisdiction over this.

7. No rental evidence has been put forward

The landlord’s case 8. The bundle includes various documents showing the Landlord is seeking possession of the house. This is not a matter over which the tribunal has any jurisdiction.

9. No rental comparable evidence has been put before the tribunal The Law 10. The Tribunal must first determine that the landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.

11. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

12. In so doing the Tribunal, is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Any improvements made during the previous regulated tenancy are no longer disregarded. Valuation 13. In the absence of any rental evidence put forward by both parties, the tribunal relies its own knowledge and experience.

14. The tribunal considers that if let in the open market on the terms of the tenancy, the property would achieve a rent of £1800 per calendar month.

Effective date 15. Under s14 (7) of the Housing Act 1988 the effective date of the decision would normally be the date shown on the [NAME] unless there is hardship to the tenant. 16. On the evidence submitted by the tenant, the tribunal finds evidence of hardship and therefore the effective date of the decision is the date of the decision which is 2 October 2020.

Name: [NAME] [NAME]:19 November 2020

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the market rent to be £1800 per month.
  • The tribunal relied on its own knowledge and experience to determine the rent.
  • The tribunal found evidence of hardship for the tenant, making the decision effective immediately.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal set the market rent for the assured periodic tenancy at £1800 per month.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the proposed rent increase from £1410 to £2400 per month.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £1800 per month, based on the property's characteristics and the lack of comparable rental evidence.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, s.14 was applied to determine the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the lack of comparable rental evidence and the need to consider the property's features.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who challenged the proposed rent increase.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect the tribunal to consider the property's features and the lack of comparable rental evidence when determining the market rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the property's features and the proposed rent increase mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.