First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,350
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a new rent of £1,350 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 20 August 2024. This decision was made after considering the market conditions and the existing rental agreement.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering factors such as the type of tenancy and any relevant improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,350 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new rent of £1,350 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 20 August 2024, following a referral under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0249
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 35B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge Dutton Mrs S Phillips MRICS
Landlord [NAME] 69 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,350 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20 August 2024
*3. The amount included for services is/is
not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 9 January 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period Annual
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per agreement
a
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord A sofa and armchair in the living room, a bed and cupboard in the bedroom and in the kitchen a table and four chairs and some white goods (Washing machine, freezer and fridge
9. Description of premises Ground floor flat comprising two rooms, kitchen and bathroom, with rear garden
Chairman Judge Dutton Date of Decision 20 August 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0249
Property : 35B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Miss [APPELLANT]
Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 8 April 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Judge Dutton Mrs S Phillips MRICS
Date of Summary Reasons
: 20 August 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,350 with effect from 20 August 2024. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 27 February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,400 in place of the existing rent of £1,200, to take effect from 31 March 2024, this being the first increase since the start of the tenancy, which was 9 January 2021.
2. On 8 April 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 8 April 2024.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions and photographs provided by the Tenant on or about 30 July 2024 and the Landlord’s response dated on or about 3 July 2024. The damage to the shed would not, we think, have an impact on the rental value, although we understand that the Landlord will attend to same.
Determination and Valuation
5. Having consideration of our own expertise and general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1,350 per calendar month. The letting is an assured shorthold letting with the repairing obligations that one would expect to find in an open market letting.
Accordingly, we do not consider any adjustments would be required to this starting rent.
Decision 6. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent should be determined at £1,350 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,350 to take effect on 20 August 2024. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship
Chairman: Judge Dutton
Date: 20 August 2024
3
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Retirement Living Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £1,600 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Comparables
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the rent based on its own expertise and knowledge of local rental values.
- The Tribunal found that damage to the shed would not affect the property's rental value.
- The Tribunal set the new rent at £1,350 per calendar month.
- The Tribunal decided the new rent should take effect on August 20, 2024, to avoid hardship for the tenant.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed new rent of £1,400 was not accepted by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,350 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market conditions and the terms of the existing tenancy agreement.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the fair market value of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions and photographs provided by both the tenant and the landlord were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if the party disagrees with the outcome.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
