Tribunal Sets New Rent of £1,600 for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,600 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting for the tenant's responsibilities for repairs and decoration.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for their repairing and decorating obligations.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they pay under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide a fair market rent, considering the terms of the tenancy and disregarding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,600 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,600 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the tenant's repairing and decorating obligations.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0184
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 13A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge Dutton Mrs S Phillips
Landlord [APPELLANT] 595 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] - [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,600 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20 August 2024
*3. The amount included for services is
not applicable N/A Per
5. Date assured tenancy commenced July 2017
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, tenant responsible for minor internal repairs and decoration.
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none
9. Description of premises Ground floor flat in a building of three flats, comprising 3 rooms, kitchen, bathroom and rear garden,
Chairman Judge Dutton Date of Decision 20 August 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0184
Property : 13A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Miss [APPELLANT] [NAME]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 22 March 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Judge Dutton Mrs S Phillips MRICS
Date of Summary Reasons
: 20 August 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,600 per calendar month with effect from 20 August 2024. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 13 February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,650 in place of the existing rent of £1,300, to take effect from 31 March 2024
2. On 22 March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 22 March 2024.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant dated 3 August 2024 and the Landlord’s letter dated 2 August 2024 with attachments.
Determination and Valuation
5. Having consideration of our own expertise and general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2,000 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
The tenant’s liability for repair and decoration of 5% Unmodernised property
15%
6. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent
£2,000 per calendar month
Less Repairing and decorating obligations approx. and condition
£400.00
Market Rent assessed at £1,600
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,600 per calendar month.
Decision
3 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,600 per calendar month
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,600 per calendar month to take effect on 20 August 2024. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.
Chairman: Judge Dutton
Date: 20 August 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Rent Reduced Due to Cladding Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Split-Level Flat in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Damp and Mould Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination: New Rent Set at £1,700 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment After Improving Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,600 per calendar month for the property.
- The Tribunal adjusted the market rent downwards due to the tenant's repairing and decorating obligations.
- The Tribunal decided that the new rent should take effect from 20 August 2024.
- The Tribunal was satisfied that the landlord's proposed starting date would cause the tenant undue hardship.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,600 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the fair market rent and the tenant's responsibilities for repairs and decoration.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the adjustment for the tenant's responsibilities for repairs and decoration.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent adjustment based on their responsibilities.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both the tenant and the landlord were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of receiving the summary reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
