VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination: New Rent Set at £1,700 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,700 per month for an assured periodic tenancy. The decision was based on the open market rent value in the Dalston area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar tenancy. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy and the terms of the existing agreement, excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,700 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,700 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering the landlord's proposal and the tenant's objection. The decision was based on the open market rent value in the Dalston area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AM/MNR/2024/0625

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY] 45 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1700 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 August 2024

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 June 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A first floor flat located over commercial premises forming part of a 4-storey block with brick elevations under a flat roof. Accommodation comprises bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom, wc.

[NAME] of Decision 11 February 2025

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AM/MNR/2024/0625

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 17 August 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 11 February 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,700 per calendar month with effect from 18 August 2024. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background

1. On the 25 June 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,418 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,296 per month to take effect from 18 August 2024. This proposed rental increase in based upon the Government’s maximum percentage increase and this matter is considered at paragraph 10 of these reasons.

2. The Tenant’s application is dated 17 August 2024 and served under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988. The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. In a letter dated 9 January 2025, the Tribunal wrote to the parties stating “The application was not received at this office before the date when the new rent specified in the notice of increase was to take effect. The Notice of Increase specifies the new rent start date as 18th August 2024 and the application was received 21st August 2024. A Tribunal may therefore decide that the application is out of time and that it does not have jurisdiction to consider the rent”. The Tenants application is signed and dated 17 August 2024 and therefore the Tribunal determines that it does have jurisdiction to consider this matter.

Inspection

4. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the limited papers.

Evidence

5. The Tribunal did not receive any submissions from the parties.

Determination and Valuation

6. Firstly, having consideration of the parties’ comparable evidence together with our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Dalston area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £1,700 per month.

7. The Tribunal have not made an adjustment in relation to condition of the property due to a lack of evidence provided by the parties.

Decision

8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy governed by the relevant clause in the agreement was £1,700 per calendar month.

3 9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,700 to take effect on the 18 August 2024. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

10. It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination.

[NAME] 11 February 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant is entitled to a market rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on property conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property's condition significantly affects its market value.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for specific conditions.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,700 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The landlord proposed a new rent, and the tenant objected to it.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the open market rent value in the Dalston area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the proposed rent with the open market rent value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the open market rent value when disputing a rent increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The comparable evidence and the general knowledge of rental values in the area were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.