VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Gateshead Apartment

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided that the landlord can set a new market rent for a furnished three-bedroom apartment in Gateshead. The decision was based on evidence of similar properties and their rental prices.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord is entitled to set a new market rent based on comparable property values and current market conditions.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section allows landlords to propose an increase in rent for assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. The landlord can serve a notice in a prescribed form to suggest a new rent that will take effect at the start of a new period, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

This section implies a covenant by the lessor to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes, as well as installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation. It also includes the obligation to maintain space heating and hot water installations in proper working order.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a furnished three-bedroom duplex apartment in Gateshead, considering comparable properties and market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent of a furnished three-bedroom duplex apartment in Gateshead, setting it at £1,500 pcm based on comparable property values and current market conditions.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference MAN/00CH/MNR/2026/0063 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] Tenant’s Representative N/A Landlord [COUNSEL] [NAME] Landlord’s Address [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne [POSTCODE] Landlord’s Representative N/A Date of Application 09.02.2026 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members I [NAME] J Bissett FRICS Date of Decision 22.05.2026 Rent Determined £1,500pcm Date the new rent takes effect 12.04.2026

REASONS FOR THE

DECISION Background 1. On 23 February 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,500per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1,400pcm to take effect from 12 April 2026. This replaces an earlier notice dated 8 January 2026 which was invalid due to incorrect dates, which the Landlord realised and reserved. On 9 February 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant appealed the proposed new rent to the Tribunal for determination. The Tenant did not dispute the validity of the notices. The monthly tenancy commenced on 12 February 2024. Allocation of Repairs and Council Tax between Landlord and Tenant.

2. Responsibility for Repairs is as per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. The property is part furnished, namely sofa, coffee table, dining table, bed and wardrobe. No service charge is payable by the Tenant. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. Inspection/Hearing 3. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise. The Property 4. The Property is in a modern development of apartments. No. 23 comprises a duplex apartment over 2 floors, Reception room, Kitchen, Master Bedroom with en suite shower room, 2 further Bedrooms one double, one three-quarter, and separate bathroom, single designated car space in shared garage for the building. The Property is situated in Gateshead close to the river on a modern development.

Representations as to Rental Value 5. Tenant The Tenant considers the apartment to be only 2 Bedrooms, plus a study, and put forward that a 2 Bedroom flat is the same building is advertised at £1,200pcm. No detailed particulars for this property were submitted. As the flat has electric heating costs are high, and no services are included.

6. Landlord The Landlord states on 7 April 2026, it is a 3 Bedroom duplex apartment, supported by floor plans and photographs. Also included is Rightmove comparable evidence including a 2 Bedroom flat in Bittern House advertised at £1,600pcm in January 2025, another 2 Bedroom in [ADDRESS] £1,500 May 2025, plus 10 others, mostly 2 Bedroom at asking rents of £1,400 to £1,500pcm. Tribunal Determination 7. The Tribunal found the following facts: i The second Landlord’s Notice was valid ii The property is a 3 Bedroom duplex apartment, albeit Bedroom 3 is three quarter, much larger than the average 2 Bedroom apartments in the block.

8. The Tribunal had regard to its own knowledge and experience of market rent levels for similar properties in the area, but without any specific or secret evidence, and the representations from each Party. The Tribunal considers that the Market Rent of the subject Property in reasonable order would be £1,500pcm. This is the rent the Tribunal would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as comparable properties and assuming floor coverings, white goods and curtains/blinds are provided by the landlord.

9. The Tribunal are unaware of any disrepairs, nor any Tenants improvements.

10. No relevant evidence was before the Tribunal in relation to Section 14 (7) whether undue hardship would be caused to the tenant by the new rent being payable from 12 April 2026, the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice. The Tenant specifically confirmed no hardship would be caused. Decision 11. In the circumstances the Tribunal determines a Market Rent of £1,500pcm payable from 12 April 2026. Appeal Provisions 12. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) but generally only on a point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord's second notice proposing the new rent was valid.
  • The property is a three-bedroom duplex apartment, which is larger than typical two-bedroom units.
  • The tribunal used its knowledge of market rent levels for similar properties in the area.
  • The tenant confirmed that paying the new rent from the specified date would not cause undue hardship.
  • The tribunal determined the market rent to be £1,500 per calendar month.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's claim that the apartment was only two bedrooms plus a study was not accepted.
  • The tenant's argument about high electric heating costs was not a factor in determining market rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal determined the market rent for a furnished three-bedroom duplex apartment to be £1,500 pcm.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in setting the new rental price for an apartment.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal considered comparable properties and market conditions to set the rent at £1,500 pcm.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied in determining the new rental price.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The landlord provided evidence showing comparable properties with similar rent prices, which influenced the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant as the new market rent was set higher than requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a similar dispute should gather evidence of comparable rental prices to support their case.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs, floor plans, and Rightmove data were important in determining the market rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Either party can appeal the decision within 28 days if they have grounds based on legal points.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.