First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent for a property, setting it at £1,575 per month. They considered local rental levels and similar properties, ignoring factors like improvements or disrepair.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination based on the prevailing rental levels in the locality and comparable properties.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
The Housing Act 1988, section 13 applies to increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It outlines the process for landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to tenants, specifying the minimum period before the new rent can take effect.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a market rent for a property based on local rental levels and comparable properties.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,575 per calendar month for a property, considering local rental levels and comparable properties, while disregarding certain factors affecting the property's value.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/OOMC/F77/2022/0009 HMCTS code : A:BTMMREMOTE Property : 15D [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant (Tenant) : [APPELLANT] [NAME] Respondent (Landlord) : [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT] of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent: Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Determination : 25 August 2022
DECISION
This has been a remote determination on the papers which the parties are taken to have consented to, as explained below. The form of determination was a telephone hearing described above as A:BTMMREMOTE. The documents that the Tribunal was referred to are in bundles from the Applicant and the Respondent. The Tribunal has noted the contents and the decision is below.
2 Decision The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,575 per calendar month effective from 29 July 2022.
Reasons Background
1. On 12 May 2022 the Landlord served notice under section 13 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 to increase the passing rent from £1,200 per month to £1,300 with effect from 29 July 2022.
2. This rent is stated to be exclusive of Council Tax, Water Charges and fixed service charges.
3. The Tenant made an [NAME] to the Tribunal in reliance on section 13 (4) of the Housing Act 1988 on 4 June 2022.
4. The Tribunal issued directions on 13 June 2022, inviting the Parties to submit any further representations (including any photographs and details of rentals for similar properties) they wished the tribunal to consider.
5. The Landlord requested a telephone hearing which was held on 18 August 2022.
The Property 6. The Tribunal has not inspected the Property and has relied upon the papers provided by the Parties together with Google Images and oral descriptions provided during the hearing.
7. The Property is a mid-terraced two-storey maisonette located over a shopping parade located on [ADDRESS] which is a main thoroughfare through Beaconsfield. The accommodation comprises three bedrooms with a kitchen, bathroom and living room. There is a private car park at the rear albeit spaces are not allocated and a private terrace which is also located at the rear.
8. The Tribunal understands that all carpets, curtains and white goods belong to the Landlord.
9. The Tribunal notes that the EPC banding is E effective from 10 June 2020 and that the assumed floor area extends to 87 square metres. It appears that the assessor’s main concern comprised an assumed lack of insulation in the roof.
10. The Tribunal also notes that the Property has been placed in Council Tax C.
3 The Tenancy 11. The Tenant occupied the Property by virtue of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy that commenced 29 July 2020 and expired 28 July 2021.
12. In the absence of a new Tenancy being entered into, an Assured Periodic Tenancy has arisen such that Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 apply. The Law 13. Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act) provides that the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the Property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy: a. “having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; b. which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; c. the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the existing tenancy.” 14. Section 14 (2) of the Act requires the Tribunal to disregard a. “Any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; b. Any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14 (3) of the Act) otherwise than as an obligation; c. Any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.” 15. Examples of a tenant’s failure to comply with the terms of the lease may include, for example, a lack of redecoration.
16. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the 1985 Act), provides that the Tribunal is to imply a covenant by the Landlord: a. “to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling- house (including drains, gutters and external pipes), b. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for the supply of water, gas and electricity and for sanitation (including basins, sinks, baths and sanitary conveniences, but not other fixtures, fittings and appliances for [NAME] use of the supply of water, gas or electricity), and
4 c. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for space heating and heating water.” 17. Section 14 (7) of the 1988 Act states: “Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.” Representations – The Tenant 18. The Tenant did not attend the hearing despite the Tribunal suspending proceedings for twenty minutes for the Tenant to make contact. The Tribunal has therefore relied solely upon the Tenant’s written representations.
19. The Tenant made the following comments in his Reply. “Property is located above a pub/restaurant. Extremely noisy and when windows open the smell of cigarettes and occasionally cannabis enters the flat. Windows mechanisms broken, some windows do not close, photos attached. Reported at beginning of tenancy. Kitchen worktop and cupboard damaged by plumber sent by landlord on an occasion to unblock sink. Hob not fully functional. Shower – very low water pressure. Have to shower crouched down. No pressure or flow at head height.” 20. The Tenant submitted photographs and copies of additional correspondence regarding issues arising at the Property.
21. No evidence of asking or achieved rents was provided by the Tenant. Representations – The Landlord 22. Mrs [APPELLANT] attended the hearing on behalf of the Landlord. The Landlord had also made written submissions.
23. The Tribunal was advised that the Tenant had served notice on the 20 July 2022 advising that he was vacating and relocating to another property with effect from 29 August 2022.
24. Mrs [NAME] referred the Tribunal to photographs of the Property taken prior to occupation by the Tenant. In addition, whilst there was evidence of disrepair at the Property it was understood that this was capable of being addressed.
5 25. All fixtures and fittings were stated to belong to the Landlord.
26. Mrs [RESPONDENT] advised that the proposed increase was below market rental levels and that, now that the Tenant had vacated, she expected to achieve a rent in excess of £1,500 pm.
27. She advised that 15C had been let to students on a discretionary rent basis of £1,375 pm with effect from January 2022 and 19C, which had recently been let at £1,500 in August 2021 has been let on the basis of £1,600 pm with effect from 2 September 2021.
28. In addition, the Tribunal noted that a three-bedroom duplex apartment located on the corner of [ADDRESS] and the B474 was advertised as having been let at £1,650 pm. Mrs [NAME] was familiar with this property and considered that it was a good comparable. Determination 29. In determining the market rent, the Tribunal has regard to prevailing levels of rent in the general locality and achieved rental values in respect of other properties of comparable accommodation and provision that would be likely to be considered by a prospective tenant. The current rent and the period that has passed since that rent was agreed or determined is not relevant.
30. The legislation requires the Tribunal to have regard to market demand assuming that the landlord is willing. The Tribunal is therefore unable to have regard to the personal circumstances or identities of the actual landlord and tenant in assessing the level of rent.
31. The Tribunal notes the comments made by the Tenant but failures on the part of the Landlord or Tenant to comply with the terms of the lease have to be disregarded in setting the level of rent.
32. The Tribunal considers that the rent proposed to the Tenant by the Landlord is conservative and the market rental, having regard to the statutory assumptions would be in the region of £1,575 pm.
33. The Tribunal therefore determines the market rental of the Property with effect from 29 July 2022 at £1,575 per calendar month. The rent payable may not, therefore, exceed this figure. However, this does not prevent the Landlord from charging a lower figure.
Name: [RESPONDENT] [NAME]: 25 August 2022
6 Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,300
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Based on Local Comparables
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent Based on Comparable Properties
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £800
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determines market rent based on comparable properties in the locality.
- Personal circumstances of the landlord are disregarded in determining market rent.
- The focus is on rental values generally and specifically for comparable properties.
- The Housing Act 1988 Sections 13 and 14 do not affect the entitlement to a fair market rent.
- The claimant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable rental values in the area.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The Tribunal's decision is influenced by factors outside of comparable rental values.
- The entitlement to a market rent is denied if the focus shifts away from comparable properties.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a market rent of £1,575 per month for a property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on local rental levels and comparable properties, ignoring factors like improvements or disrepair.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property to similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider local rental levels and comparable properties when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and details of rental prices for similar properties were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
