VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent for a a person, considering its condition and similar properties. The rent was set at £560 per month starting from February 1st, 2020, according to the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under the relevant tenancy legislation, a tribunal sets a market rent by assessing the condition and facilities of the property.

Topics

market rentproperty conditioncomparative analysis

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new period for the tenancy starting at least two months after the notice is served. If the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can only occur after a specific time frame, which varies depending on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

A tribunal determined a market rent for a property considering its dated facilities and minor structural issues, setting the rent at £560 per month.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £560 per calendar month for a property, taking into account its condition and comparable properties, under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988. Judge JR Morris presided over the case.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: CAM/34UD/MNR/2020/0002

[NAME]

: [ADDRESS], Stoke Doyle, Oundle, Peterborough [POSTCODE]

Applicant (Tenant) : Miss [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Respondent (Landlord): [NAME]

: [NAME] of [NAME] : Determination of a market rent under

Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Judge JR Morris Regional Valuer Mrs M Hardman FRICS IRRV (Hons)

Date of Decision : 3rd March 2020

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019

DECISION

1. The Tribunal determined a rent of £560.00 per calendar month to take effect from 1st February 2020.

REASONS

THE [NAME]

2. The [NAME] is a mid-terraced two storey period cottage of stone under a pitched slate roof with more recent brick two and single storey extensions at the rear. The kitchen is in the ground floor of the two-storey extension with bedroom 3 above. The bathroom is in the single storey extension. There are two stone stores with Colleyweston slate roofs at the rear. There are gardens to front and rear. There is a shared access across the rear garden.

Accommodation On the ground floor the [NAME] comprises a front hallway from which stairs rise to the first floor, a living room, beyond which is a kitchen, a rear hallway with door to FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])

2 the rear garden and off which is the bathroom. On the first floor are three bedrooms.

Services The space heating is by night storage heaters and water heating is by a tank immersion heater. The [NAME] has mains electricity, water and drainage.

Furnishing The [NAME] is let unfurnished.

Location The [NAME] is in a village two miles from Oundle where there is a range of facilities.

THE TENANCY

3. The Tenancy is an Assured Periodic Tenancy which commenced in June 2010. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies in respect of the Landlord’s repairing obligations.

THE REFERRAL

4. The current rent is £530.00 per calendar month from the commencement of the Tenancy. The Landlord by a notice in the prescribed form dated 18th December 2019 proposed a new rent of £570.00 per calendar month from 1st February 2020.

5. The notice also proposed a rent of £600.00 from 1st February 2021. There is no provision within sections 13 or 14 of the Housing Act 1988 which permit a notice to increase the rent over two years or for a tribunal to make such determination. Therefore, the Tribunal will set a single rent to be effective from the date specified in the notice which is 1st February 2020.

6. On 6th January 2020 the Tenant referred the notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal. The referral was a determination after an inspection of the [NAME] on consideration of written representations.

THE INSPECTION

7. The Tribunal inspected the [NAME] in the presence of the Tenant.

8. Externally the house is in fair condition. There are upvc double glazed windows to the front of the house. The front door is timber and is said to be ill fitting and draughty. The windows at the rear are timber casement windows which are in poor condition.

9. There are enclosed gardens to the front and rear. In the fences on each side of the garden there are gates providing the shared access across the rear of all the gardens in the terrace to the lane at the end. The stone stores are in fair condition. There is an open covered area over the rear of the house consisting of a timber frame with corrugated plastic roof.

10. Internally the [NAME] has been decorated by the Tenant. There is a fitted kitchen which relatively dated although serviceable. The bathroom is similarly dated but

3 serviceable. There is an electric shower but no extractor fan. No white goods are provided. There are signs of what is probably rising damp on the front wall of the living room and on the external walls of the brick extensions. The walls of the extensions are solid 9 inch and therefore not well insulated. The plaster shows signs of having perished in a number of areas.

11. There are night storage heaters in the living room, bathroom, and in each bedroom. The heater in bedroom 1 has been replaced but the replacement was not working on the day of inspection. The heater in the living room appeared small for the size of the room. The Tribunal is of the opinion that the heater in the bathroom should be inspected by a qualified electrician as it did not appear to comply with current safety standards due to its proximity to the bath and shower. All the heaters, except that in bedroom 1 were dated. There is an open fire in the living room.

12. The carpets were provided and the floor covering in the kitchen. The floor covering in the bathroom had to be replaced by the Tenant because following the replacement of the bath the existing floor covering no longer fitted.

THE LAW

13. The relevant law is in sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 which is summarised below.

14. By virtue of section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 for the purpose of securing an increase in the rent, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than:

The minimum period after the date of the service of the notice being (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months; (b) in the case of a tenancy where the period is less than a month, one month; (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy,

And the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began.

Where a notice is served a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the notice unless, before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice, — (a) the tenant by an [NAME] in the prescribed form refers the notice to the appropriate tribunal; or (b) the landlord and the tenant agree on a variation of the rent which is different from that proposed in the notice or agree that the rent should not be varied.

Nothing in this section (or in section 14 below) affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).

15. By virtue of section 14 (1) Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal is to determine a rent at which the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured periodic tenancy- (a) having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;

4 (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the subject Tenancy

16. By virtue of section 14 (2) Housing Act 1988 in [NAME] a determination the Tribunal shall disregard – (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14(3) Housing Act 1988) carried out by a tenant otherwise than as an obligation; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house due to the failure of the Tenant to comply with any terms of the subject Tenancy.

REPRESENTATIONS

Condition

17. The Tenant made written representations. The Tenant said that the condition of the [NAME] was not good when she took occupation but she needed the accommodation because she had to be close to a relative. She referred to each room as follows:

18. Kitchen This room is part of the 9-inch brickwork extension with single glazed window. The Tenant said the extension suffered from rising damp which caused anything kept in the base cupboards on the wall adjoining her neighbour to go mouldy. The Tenant paid £85.00 towards wall cupboards being fitted. In the past there has been a problem with water hammer however this appears to have been remedied.

19. Bathroom This room is also part of the extension and has a single glazed window. There is a small storage heater over 40 years old. The bath has been renewed. The new bath was narrower therefore there was a 6-inch gap in the flooring. The Landlord would not renew the flooring and therefore the Tenant did so at a cost of £95.00. The Tenant said she also renewed the dated wash hand basin and taps, which were rusty, at a cost of £150.00 because the Landlord would not do so. The high-level toilet cistern has been mended several times.

20. Rear Hallway The rear hallway has no heating and the back door is draughty and was only fitted with a lock in 2019, prior to that it was only bolted.

21. Sitting Room This room has a small storage heater over 40 years old and a 16-inch fireplace. The room is cold and requires an open fire to keep it warm which is expensive. Wood and coal cost about £500 to £600 a year. The electricity bill is also expensive. The Landlord has refused to install a mixed fuel stove.

22. Front Hallway The front hallway has no heating and the front door is draughty.

23. Upstairs Landing The window on the landing is single glazed and ill-fitting and leaks.

5

24. Bedroom 3 This room is part of the brick extension with a flat roof. The storage heater is over 40 years old and the window is single glazed and the frame is rotten.

25. Bedroom 2 This room has a new double glazed window. The Tenant has re-fixed the curtain rail.

26. Bedroom 1 This room has a new double-glazed window and a new storage heater replacing that which was over 40 years old. The ceiling collapsed on 29th December 2018. It was subsequently repaired. The Tenant said that she had to sleep on the sofa for two weeks and the Landlord allowed her two months’ rent free by way of compensation and paid her £50.00 towards a new bed and linen and £15.00 towards cleaning the bed spread.

27. The Tenant provided a Schedule of Condition, issued and agreed at the time of letting, which stated that notwithstanding an oil stain across the hallway and sitting room carpets they were in good condition and were fitted in all rooms. The lino in the rear hall, kitchen and bathroom were average/poor. The decoration to the walls and ceilings were average.

28. The Agent submitted representations in response as follows:

29. Kitchen The water hammer was remedied after plumbing repairs were carried out in September 2018 and February 2019. The Landlord contributed £300 to the new wall cupboards.

30. Bathroom No reference to the flooring or taps has been found on file. The w.c. was repaired shortly after the Tenant reported a leak.

31. Rear Hallway Issues regarding the back door were resolved in September 2019 draught seals having been fitted, refurbishment of the door surround, upgrading of the lock and [NAME] good of decorations. The Tenant expressed satisfaction.

32. Sitting Room The installation of double-glazed windows, at a cost of £4,500 (including VAT) plus £250.00 to the Tenant, was part of the general periodic energy efficiency review across the estate.

33. Front Hallway This was noted.

34. Upstairs Landing The repair of this window was identified as part of the quinquennial review and the Agent was not aware that it had not been carried out. Repair had been instructed.

6

35. Bedroom 3 The window in this room is also to repaired as for that of the landing.

36. Bedroom 2 No reference to the curtain rail fixings was found on file.

37. Bedroom 1 The Agent expressed regret that the ceiling had not been repaired before its collapsed. It was said that the repair was instructed immediately and that the compensation including the £1,060 rent allowance was agreed with the Tenant.

38. The Agent commented that the Schedule of Condition signed by the Tenant referred to more items as being in good condition or average/poor condition and none were in poor condition therefore the [NAME] as let was in average condition.

39. The [COMPANY] policy is to review rents every two years, but since 2016 they have been deferred until the notice served in December 2019.

Rents for [APPELLANT]

40. The Tenant referred to the following properties which are houses in the row as being of comparable rental value: No. 1 the rent is £366.00 per calendar month. The tenant of this [NAME] is the [NAME] who the Tenant said “has a loose arrangement with the Landlord and Agent”. No. 2 the rent is not known. No 3 a Fair rent was set at £425.00 per calendar month No.4 a Fair rent was set at £425.00 per calendar month No.9 the rent is not known No. 10 the rent is £400.00 per calendar month. No. 11/12 is two cottages joined together (6 bedrooms, new bathroom and fitted kitchen installed in 2012) let at a rent of £625.00 per calendar month.

41. The [NAME] referred to the following properties as being comparable providing brief information and details and links to further details on the Rightmove Internet site. These are listed in order of proximity to the [NAME]. The rent in bold is the Agent’s submission were the [NAME] a three-bedroom house.

Address House Type Rent pcm £ Summary of Comments [ADDRESS], Oundle 1 bed terrace 575/775 Let, smaller, gas central heating [ADDRESS], Oundle 2 bed terrace 695/825 Let, Modern, good decorative order, inferior character, central heating 3 [NAME] 2 bed sheltered apartment 675/800 Let, Sheltered apartment [ADDRESS], Polebrook 2 bed terrace 595/700 Let, smaller, better decorative order newer kitchen, storage heaters

7 5 Polebrook 2 bed terrace 750/875 Let, high overall standard, recently refurbished, wood burner, storage heaters, off road parking, garden, less charming exterior. 6 High Street, Brigstock 2 bed terrace 650/775 Available, similar condition, similar size, off road parking no garden or outbuildings [ADDRESS], Thrapston 2 bed terrace 650/775 Better internal condition, slightly larger garden, central heating, inferior character 8 High Street, Islip 2 bed end terrace 700/825 Grade 2 listed character [NAME], smaller but very dated and in need of internal refurbishment, no garden 9 High Street, Woodford 3 bed terrace 750 Available, similar size but inferior character, better interior, local amenities, downstairs bathroom

42. It was also stated that No. [ADDRESS] was let at a rent of £530.00 per calendar month in 2015 which indexed would now be £600.00 per calendar month.

43. The Agent submitted that overall, the comparable properties justified the rent of £570 to £600 per calendar month.

44. With regard to No. [ADDRESS] the Tenant said that it was in excellent condition with secondary double glazing when the rent was set at £530.00 per calendar month in 2015. The Tenant drew attention to some of the comparable properties referred to by the Agent as having well-appointed kitchens and bathrooms and central heating and being in good decorative order.

DETERMINATION

45. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a [NAME] by reference to rental values generally and to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality in particular. The Tribunal does not take into account the present rent and the period of time which that rent has been charged nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the existing rent.

46. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal cannot take into account the personal circumstances of either the Landlord or the Tenant.

47. The Tribunal assessed a rent based on the condition of the [NAME] as at the time of the inspection. Therefore, it did not take into account disrepair that had been remedied e.g. the collapse of the ceiling in Bedroom 1 or the past water hammer. that the current landlord had only recently purchased the [NAME] or that it was intended to carry out works in the future.

8 48. The Tribunal took into account the matters identified at the Inspection noting matters referred to specifically by the parties, such as:

 The condition of the [NAME] including the perished plaster on some of the walls, the evidence of damp, the poor condition of the rear windows and the good condition of the upvc double glazed front windows and the seals around the doors;

 The space and water heating;

 The relatively dated kitchen and bathroom, including the lack of white goods and the replacement of the wash hand basin by the Tenant. The provision of carpets by the Landlord and the replacement of the bathroom floor covering by the Tenant.

49. The Tribunal then considered the rental values submitted by the parties.

50. With regard to the Fair Rents referred to by the Tenant for Nos. 3 and [ADDRESS] the Tribunal is not able to accept these as comparable rental values. The reason is that they are subject to different legislation.

51. For these rents the Rent Officer (or a tribunal) will initially assess a market rent based upon comparable properties. To that extent the process is the same. However, adjustments are then made for condition and improvements. Following this a percentage discount may be made if the Rent Officer or tribunal are of the opinion that the rent is ‘inflated’ because there is greater demand for the houses than supply. Finally, the rent may be ‘capped’ under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. This means that a formula is applied to the rent so that it does not rise approximately more than the rate of inflation. The [NAME] does not provide these calculations and therefore the tribunal cannot rely upon the registered rent as being a guide to the market rent for the [NAME] or similar [NAME].

52. With regard to the rents for Nos. 10 and 11/12 it is not clear whether these are Fair Rents or not. The Tribunal found there to be insufficient detail with regard to the type of letting or the condition of the [NAME] for them to be relied upon.

53. With regard to the properties submitted by the [NAME] the Tribunal was cautious with regard to what the Agent submitted the rental values would be for the properties which had two bedrooms if they had three bedrooms. Houses with two bedrooms and a bathroom upstairs may be of the same size and many tenants would favour the convenience of an upstairs bathroom over a third bedroom. Therefore, to assess the value of a third bedroom is not necessarily a pro rata calculation.

54. The Tribunal considered the properties submitted and found that the following were not comparable:

2. [ADDRESS], Oundle – This is a modern [NAME] in good condition with up to date kitchen and bathroom, downstairs cloakroom, fitted wardrobes, off road parking and gardens. A three-bedroom house of this type would be larger than the [NAME]. It is very different from the [NAME].

9 3. [NAME] – As a sheltered apartment this is a different type of [NAME] with a different market.

55. The Tribunal found the following properties generally similar but their location in or adjacent a large village or town meant they were not directly comparable and therefore only a guide:

6. High Street, Brigstock – This house is similar in size and layout but with a much better internal condition with modern kitchen and bathroom and gas central heating and off-road parking. The garden is shared. Brigstock is a large village with the amenities of a public house, shop and schools.

7. [ADDRESS], Thrapston – This house is in much better internal condition with modern kitchen and bathroom, central heating and larger garden. Its town location, affords a range of nearby facilities.

8. High Street, Islip – As a Grade II listed building this is a different type of house to the [NAME] and is on three floors plus a cellar and a garage. It has central heating but otherwise appears dated. It is within walking distance of Thrapston which has a range of nearby facilities.

9. High Street, Woodford – This house is similar in size and layout but with a much better internal condition with modern kitchen and bathroom and gas central heating. Woodford is large village with the amenities of a public house, shop and schools.

56. The Tribunal found the following properties generally comparable:

4. [ADDRESS], Polebrook – This is perhaps the most similar [NAME], in a village setting with storage heaters. However, it is in better decorative order with modern kitchen and bathroom. There are two bedrooms but the bathroom is upstairs. Allowing for its apparently smaller size a market rent of £700.00 per calendar month if it had three bedrooms would appear about right.

5. [NAME] similar in style and structure to the [NAME] nevertheless this house is in a village location and significantly better appointed. As commented by the Agent it is of a high overall standard, recently refurbished, with wood burner, storage heaters, off road parking, and an attractive garden. Whether or not it is less charming than the [NAME] is a subjective view. The Tribunal is of the opinion that is would attract a higher market rent than the [NAME].

57. The Tribunal noted all the representations with regard to rental values for comparable properties. The Tribunal added to this the knowledge and experience of its members and found that the [NAME] in good condition with modern facilities would be £700.00 per calendar month.

58. However, the Tribunal found that the [NAME] had a relatively dated kitchen and bathroom. The heating was also dated except for the heater in the bedroom 1 which was not working. There were signs of rising damp on the ground floor and the single glazed timber windows at the rear were in need of repair or replacement. The Tribunal therefore made a deduction of £145.00 per calendar month (approximately 20%). It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based specifically upon capital cost but is the

10 Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would have to be reduced to attract a tenant.

59. Therefore, the Tribunal determined that that the market rent for the [NAME] in its present condition is £560.00 per calendar month to take effect from 1st February 2020.

Judge JR Morris

Caution: The Tribunal inspected the subject [NAME] for the purposes of reaching this decision. The inspection was not a structural survey and any comments about the condition of the [NAME] in this statement must not be relied upon as a guide to the structural or other condition of the [NAME].

APPENDIX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. If a party wishes to appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's condition is considered when determining the market rent.
  • Comparable rents in the local area are used to determine the market rent.
  • The location of the property is taken into account when setting the market rent.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • Current market conditions are solely relied upon without considering the property's condition.
  • The actual condition of the property is not sufficiently emphasized in the argument.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a market rent of £560 per month for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and compared it to similar properties.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and comparisons to similar properties were crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can refer to the Housing Act 1988 for determining a fair market rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the property's condition and comparable properties.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a party can appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.