First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new monthly rent for a property after considering similar properties and the condition of the property. The rent was set at £6,450 per month, effective from May 16, 2024.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have a market rent determined based on comparable properties and the condition of the property itself.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on reasonable expectations of what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property after considering comparable evidence and the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a market rent of £6,450 per calendar month for a property after considering comparable evidence and adjusting for the property's condition, including a slightly tired kitchen and lack of parking or en-suite bathroom. Judge Bernadette MacQueen presided over the case.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AN/MNR/2024/0294
Property : 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenants
: [NAME] and [NAME]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 13 May 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Judge Bernadette MacQueen
Mrs [NAME], MRICS
Date of Decision : 23 September 2024
Date of Summary Reasons
: 7 October 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £6,450 per calendar month with effect from 16 May 2024. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On 12 April 2024, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £6,900 per month in place of the existing rent of £6,300 per month to take effect from 16 May 2024.
2. By application received by the Tribunal on 13 May 2024, made under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection and Hearing
3. On 23 September 2024, the Tribunal held a short oral hearing and also carried out an inspection of the Property, accompanied by [RESPONDENT] on behalf of the Tenants and [RESPONDENT], Landlord.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal considered the written submissions provided by both the Tenants and the Landlord, which consisted of their Reply forms, along with additional written evidence, and similar properties that both the Tenant and the Landlord asked the Tribunal to consider. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the oral submissions made at the hearing by both parties, as well as its inspection of the Property.
Determination and Valuation
5. The Property was a 19-century end of terrace house that had a living room, kitchen, cloakroom, laundry room, 5 bedrooms, 2 separate bathrooms, a walk-in dressing room, an attic study and a private garden. The Property had central heating and triple glazed windows, provided by the Landlord. The Landlord had also provided the white goods, flooring, curtains and blinds.
6. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties, and the Tribunal’s own expert knowledge and experience, the Tribunal considered that the open market rental value for a similar property in this location would be in the range of £6,700 per calendar month. The Tribunal then adjusted this to £6,450 to reflect in particular that the kitchen was slightly tired in appearance and the property did not benefit from parking or an en suite bathroom.
3
Decision
7. The Tribunal determined a market rent of £6,450 per calendar month, to take effect from 16 May 2024.
Judge Bernadette MacQueen
Date: 7 October 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Property with Faulty Appliances
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Due to Undue Hardship - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Unfurnished Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property is in disrepair.
- Rent reflects open market value adjusted for property's deficiencies.
- Rent adjustment based on property's condition and market comparables.
- Rent adjustment based on property's condition and tenant's financial circumstances.
- Proposed rent causes undue hardship.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new market rent of £6,450 per month for a property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered comparable properties and adjusted the rent based on the property's condition.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property, such as the slightly tired kitchen, influenced the final rent amount.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect a market rent determination based on comparable properties and the condition of their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions, oral arguments, and an inspection of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, but only after requesting full reasons from the tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor.
