First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new monthly rent of £500 for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the tenant's contributions and the property's condition. This decision reflects the fair market value of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a new market rent of £500 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the tenant's provision of white goods and curtains, and the dated condition of the property's fittings and decoration.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0106
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 500.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 02 October 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 02 August 2017
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Second floor one-bedroomed flat.
[NAME] of Decision 11 November 2021
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0106 Property :
Top Floor [ADDRESS] Kent CT 20 1DA
Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] :
[COUNSEL]
Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
11th November 2021
DECISION
CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0106
2 Summary of Decision
1. On 11th November 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £500 per month for the property to take effect from 2nd October 2021.
Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 28th July 2021 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £500 per month in place of the existing rent of £450 per month to take effect from 2nd October 2021. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 2nd September 2021 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 30th September 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. Both parties submitted papers by the specified dates. The Tenant provided many useful photographs and a plan of each room within the property. The papers were also copied to the other party. A Tribunal hearing was arranged for 11th November 2021 using video conferencing.
The Property 8. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a second floor flat within a three-storey conversion situated close to the centre of Folkestone.
9. All main amenities are within a reasonable distance including a mainline Railway Station with regular services to London St Pancras.
10. The accommodation is described as including a Hallway, Living Room, Kitchen, Bedroom and Bathroom with WC. Windows are double-glazed and there is a central heating system. There is no outside space.
11. The EPC for the property, assessed as a ‘D’, expired on 29th November 2019.
CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0106
3 Submissions 12. The initial tenancy began on 2nd August 2017 at an initial rent of £450 per month. White goods and curtains are provided by the Tenant.
13. The Landlord’s Agent provided details of similar properties in the area that have been available to rent.
14. The Tenant states that the Bathroom and Kitchen fittings are 10-15 years old as evidenced by the photographs he has provided. There are no outstanding issues between the parties relating to repair.
The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his [NAME], or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0106
4
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation 15. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
16. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.
17. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Folkestone the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £600 per month
18. However the property is not let in such condition as is usual. The Tribunal decided that it should make a number of reductions from this open market rent to take account of the fact that the Tenant provides white goods and curtains, and that internal fittings and decoration are dated and subject to general wear and tear.
19. Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made:
Tenant’s provision of white goods £35
CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0106
5 Tenant’s provision of curtains £15 Dated kitchen and bathroom, general wear and tear £50
____ TOTAL £100
20. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.
Determination 21. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £500 per month.
22. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £500 per month should take effect from 2nd October 2021, this being the date specified in the Notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £1300 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,550 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate After Written Submissions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1800 per Month for Assured Tenancy…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
- The rent is adjusted for the condition of the property.
- The rent takes into account local rental trends and improvements made by the tenant.
- The case is heard and decided by a First-tier Tribunal based on written representations without objections.
- The rent is set based on the open market value and conditions of similar properties.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The rent is set at what a willing landlord might reasonably expect in the open market, excluding service charges and considering the property's condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new market rent of £500 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market conditions and the property's state, adjusting for the tenant's contributions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the fair market value of the property, adjusted for the tenant's contributions.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair market rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may expect a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and the tenant's contributions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and plans of the property provided by the tenant were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
