VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Rent of £1300 for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1300 per month for an assured periodic tenancy. This decision was based on the Housing Act 1988 and took into account comparable rents in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationhousing act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy. The determination considers comparable rents in the area and the condition of the property.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1300 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1300 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable rents in the area and the current condition of the property. The decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BF/MNR/2023/0275

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [NAME] 60 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1300 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 June 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 May 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord 1 dining table and 2 chairs, 1 balcony table and 2 chairs, 1 bedside table, 2 bookshelves, 1 bed frame

9. Description of premises 10th floor flat comprising reception room/kitchen, bedroom, bathroom

Chairman A [NAME] of Decision 12 March 2024

1

Case Reference : LON/00BF/MNR/2023/0275

Property

: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant :

Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] & Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 15 June 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 12 March 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1300 per calendar month with effect from 15 June 2023. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 17 May 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 1550.00 in place of the existing rent of £1250.00 per month to take effect from 20 June 2023.

2. On 15 June 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 15 June 2023.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. The papers show the property is a part furnished 1 bedroom flat.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and/the Landlord. A schedule of comparable rents was provided with rents for a 2 bedroom flat from £1450 to £1550 per month and for a 1 bed flat from £950 to £1350 per month.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £1300 per calendar month.

Decision

6. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy was £1300.00 per calendar month.

7. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1300.00 to take effect on 15 June 2023 this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase

Chairman: A [NAME]: 12 March 2024

3 APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's claim was dismissed despite being entitled to a fair market rent determination.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £1300 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable rents in the area and the current condition of the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rent with similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable rents in the area and the current condition of the property were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.