VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £1,095 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable evidence and local market conditions.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent that reflects the open market value of their property, adjusted for its condition and location.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationmarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a new rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the property's condition, location, and the terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and local market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,095 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and local market conditions.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/18UG/MNR/2025/0777

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] 241 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1,095.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 December 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 15 December 2016

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy.

6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises A purpose built first floor flat built in 2016 forming part of a three storey building. Accommodation comprises living room, kitchen, two bedrooms, bathroom and allocated parking space.

[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 17 November 2025

1

Case Reference

: HAV/18UG /MNR/2025/0777

Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenants

: [NAME] [RESPONDENT] & [NAME]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] of Objection : 16 September 2025

Type of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 17 November 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,095 per calendar month with effect from 15 December 2025. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On the 15 September 2025 the Landlord’s agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,095 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,000 per month to take effect from 15 December 2025.

2. The Tenant’s [NAME] is dated the 16 September 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988. The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the extensive written submissions provided by the parties together with comparable evidence of varying properties in the area and helpful photographs.

Determination and Valuation

5. Firstly, having consideration of the parties’ comparable evidence together with our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Totnes area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £1,095 per month.

6. The Tribunal have not made an adjustment in relation to condition of the property based upon the photographic evidence and the parties’ statements.

Decision

7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy governed by the relevant clause in the agreement was £1,095 per calendar month.

8. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,095 to take effect on the 15 December 2025. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

3 APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent [NAME] for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: HAV/18UG /MNR/2025/0777

Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenants

: [NAME] [RESPONDENT] & [NAME]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] .

Date of Objection : 16 September 2025

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Reasons

: 8 December 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,095 per calendar month with effect from 15 December 2025. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS Background 1. The Tribunal issued summary reasons following determination of this [NAME] 0n the 17 November 2025. Either party may request full reasons. These full reasons are provided following a written request via email from the Tenant dated 3 December 2025.

2. The Tenants have lived in the property since 2016 and the Tribunal were provided with a copy of the fixed-term agreement covering the period between 15 December 2016 and to end on 14 June 2017. Therefore, the fixed term tenancy has ceased, and the Tenants continue to occupy the property under a statutory periodic tenancy.

3. On the 15 September 2025 the Landlord served a notice pursuant to section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 seeking to increase the rent from £1,000 per calendar month to £1,095 per calendar month being an increase of £95 effective from 15 December 2025.

4. By an [NAME] dated 16 September 2025, the Tenants referred that Notice to the Tribunal for determination of the market rent.

5. Directions, dated 8 October 2025, required the Landlord to complete a reply form and the Tenants to do similar. Both the Landlord and the Tenants complied and both parties agreed that this matter could be determined on the papers alone.

6. These reasons address the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each point referred to in submissions but concentrate on those issues which, in the Tribunal’s view, are fundamental to the determination. Evidence 7. The Tribunal had before it a bundle of evidence, which had included a background to the case and the Directions. Each of the parties made comprehensive submissions in writing together with photographs and comparable evidence of various properties in the surrounding area.

8. The Tenants felt that the proposed increase in rent was not in line with other properties in the area. The two comparables provided by the tenant were for 2-bedroom houses which are a different property type to the subject. The Tenants state that the service charges for the block are included within the rental payment. This is not correct, and the Landlord

3 is responsible for management fees and service charges associated with the property.

9. The Landlord contends that the proposed rent increase is reasonable, justified and fair in line with current local market conditions. The Landlord’s agent provided the Tribunal with a selection of comparable evidence (Rightmove Best Price Guide within a 3-mile radius) for two- bedroom houses and flats that had let in the general area. The Tribunal focused on the two bedroom flat that was let at £1,200 per month in [ADDRESS], which is situated on the same development. This flat has a similar floor area to the subject but has a garage and overlooks the river. The Landlord’s agent concluded that based on this evidence the subject property would let in today’s market at £1,095 per month. Property 10. The property is a purpose built first floor flat built by [COMPANY] forming part of a three storey block built in 2016 with an allocated parking space. Accommodation comprises: two bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom and balcony. The property has an EPC Rating of B and a floor area of 65 square metres. The property has electric heating, double glazed windows, fitted floor coverings and carpets, provided by the landlord, curtains and integrated white goods in the kitchen. The Landlord’s agent stated there was no disrepair.

11. The property is located on a modern estate close to local amenities, shopping facilities and transport links and schools. The Law 12. The law governing a determination is set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 (‘the 1988 Act’). In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy.

13. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, and as set out in the previous tenancy agreement, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration.

The Valuation

4 14. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide the case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

15. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. Such a letting would normally include carpets, curtains, cooker, fridge and washing machine. Market rents are normally expressed as a figure per month.

16. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.

17. The Tribunal has considered all the submissions from the parties and on the evidence provided the Tribunal considers that an achievable rent for a similar two-bedroomed flat in a good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom fittings, modern services with carpets curtains and white goods provided by the Landlord would be £1,095 per month. This figure is based upon the comparable evidence provided by the parties and the Tribunal’s professional judgement. This figure took into account the Tenant’s photographic evidence in connection with the condition of the property. Decision 18. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,095 per calendar month.

19. The Tenants made no representation that the proposed starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cuase undue hardship.

20. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1,095 per calendar month to take effect on the 15 December 2025. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

5

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent reflects the open market value of the property.
  • Rent adjustments consider the condition of the property.
  • Fair rent adjustments take into account the tenant's ability to pay.
  • Rent determinations adjust for the property's location.
  • Improvements made by the tenant can influence rent adjustments.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,095 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and local market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparable evidence showing the market rent for similar properties.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider comparable evidence when disputing a rent increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and comparable evidence of rental prices for similar properties mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.