VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables. The rent was set at £2,220.00 per quarter, effective from March 25, 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent for their assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and market comparables.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancyproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine a reasonable rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive in the open market for a similar property.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the lessor to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes. Additionally, the lessor must keep in repair and proper working order the installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation, as well as those for space heating and heating water.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and market comparables.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition, lack of central heating, and outdated kitchen and bathroom fittings, among other factors, resulting in a rent of £2,220.00 per quarter.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/19UE/MNR/2022/0131

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Lower Farm Cottage, Manston, Sturminster Newton, Dorset, [POSTCODE]

Mr R [NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 1st Floor, Citygate, St. [ADDRESS], Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne And Wear, [POSTCODE]

[APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 2220.00 Per Quarter (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 25 March 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced January 2004 (succession)

5. Length of the term or rental period Quarterly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Detached house with 3 bedrooms but in need of refurbishment.

Chairman Mr R [NAME] of Decision 13 January 2023

1

Case Reference

: CHI/19UE/MNR/2022/0131

Property : Lower Farm Cottage, Manston, Sturminster Newton, Dorset [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

(Landlord) c/o [RESPONDENT] of Application : Received 9th November 2022

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]

: 13th January 2023

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 13th January 2023 that the rent will be £2,220.00 per quarter (pq) with effect from 25th March 2023.

2. By an application received on the 9th November 2022, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The landlord's notice dated the 13th October 2022 proposed a rent of £2,500.00 pq with effect from 25th March 2023, in place of the current rent of £2,300.00 pq.

4. The tenancy is an assured tenancy. No tenancy agreement was produced but the current tenancy commenced by succession in January 2004. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 2nd December 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet as well as factual information and findings from the Tribunal’s previous decision dated 19th December 2019, and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience, the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in a rural location close to the River Stour in the hamlet of Manston about 10 miles north west of Blandford Forum.

8. The property comprises a detached house. It appears to be of solid masonry construction with mainly stone faced elevations under a tiled roof.

9. The accommodation comprises: Entrance hall, 2 living rooms, kitchen, bathroom/w.c and 3 bedrooms. Outside: Garden, outbuildings and driveway.

10. The property is let unfurnished with no floor coverings. There is no central heating and the windows are single glazed.

11. The Tribunal assumed that mains services are available.

12. The Tribunal noted that the property was identified on the Environment Agency Flood Risk Register as being in a ‘medium risk’ area with a chance of flooding at between 1.00% and 3.30% each year from rivers or sea with a ‘low risk’ of surface water flooding.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions.

14. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form and statement.

3

15. [APPELLANT]: Application, Reply Form and Notice of Increase.

Landlord's Representations (summarised):

16. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and attachments: a) The property is in fair condition for its age and type. b) Since last rent review secondary glazing has been installed. c) Undated photographs are attached.

17. As to rental value the Landlord refers to two properties being advertised: a) Farringdon, Blandford Forum: 3 bedroom semi detached house. Asking rent £3,450.00 pq. b) Terrace Farm Cottage, near Stour Provost: 3 bedroom detached house. Asking rent £3,300.00 pq. c) In arriving at the proposed rent of £2,500.00 pq, the landlord considered the following deductions should be made from a market rent of £3,300.00 pq:

Floor coverings and curtains: £30.00 pq. White Goods: £45.00 pq. En-suite bathroom: £75.00 pq. Tenants Improvements/obligations: £65.00 pq.

d) They state that as there is an inadequate supply of property in this area scarcity would apply.

[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised)

18. The [APPELLANT] says in the Application and a letter to the Tribunal:

a) The property has been occupied by his family since 1951. b) Improvements have been carried out by the [APPELLANT]’s family including: installation of electricity and water; replaced various windows; refitted kitchen (50 years ago) and bathroom (20 years ago) and fireplace. c) [APPELLANT] have not done much but neither has the [APPELLANT] requested repairs. d) The house is in a flood zone which can be a problem sometimes. e) There is bus service twice a day the [APPELLANT] thinks.

19. As to the proposed rent the [APPELLANT] makes no submission.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 20. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

21. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.

4

22. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at G expiring on 4th February 2030. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.

23. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

24. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it agreed with the Landlord that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine, fridge and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £3,300.00 pq.

25. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make deductions in respect of issues identified:

a) General condition including lack of central heating and poor energy efficiency : £450.00 pq. b) Lack of white goods: £90.00 pq. c) Lack of floor coverings and curtains: £150.00 pq. d) Outdated kitchen and bathroom fittings: £300.00 pq. e) Located in a ‘medium’ Flood Risk Area: £90.00 pq.

Total deduction £1080.00 pq.

26. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £2,220.00 pq.

27. The rent will take effect from 25th March 2023 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 28. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

29. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620).

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for

5

permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined a market rent for a modernised property in fair condition to be £3,300.00 per quarter.
  • The property's general condition, including lack of central heating and poor energy efficiency, led to a £450.00 per quarter deduction.
  • The absence of white goods in the property resulted in a £90.00 per quarter deduction.
  • The lack of floor coverings and curtains contributed to a £150.00 per quarter deduction from the market rent.
  • The outdated kitchen and bathroom fittings led to a £300.00 per quarter deduction.
  • The property's location in a 'medium' flood risk area resulted in a £90.00 per quarter deduction.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £2,220.00 per quarter for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables, considering factors like the lack of central heating and outdated kitchen and bathroom fittings.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and the market comparables were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might expect a rent determination based on the property's condition and market comparables.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the property's condition, market comparables, and the landlord's proposal for rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.