First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy. They looked at the property's condition and what similar properties are rented for to set a fair price. The new rent includes fixed charges for services and utilities.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the open market value of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the property's condition and the terms of the existing tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on an open market valuation.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on an open market valuation, taking into account the property's condition and the tenant's payment for utilities. The decision was made by Mr B H R Simms and Mr N I Robinson on 23 August 2019.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00ML/MNR/2019/0049
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] I [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 120.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 22 July 2019
3. The amount included for services is: £ 30.00 Per Week
4. Date assured tenancy commenced April 2004
5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant – none Landlord – all repairs and decorations
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Chest of drawers, chair, carpets & curtains, bed & mattress, wardrobe
8. Description of premises Ground Floor – communal entrance Room 32 – bedsitting room with kitchenette & sink Shared Facilities – shower & wc with washbasin
[NAME] of Decision 23 August 2019
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00ML/MNR/2019/0049 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Type of Application : Determination of open market rent: S.14 Housing Act 1988 Tenant : [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] Landlord : [APPELLANT]. Date of Decision : 23 August 2019 Tribunal Members : [NAME] (Chairman) [NAME] FOR THE DECISION
2 Background 1. By an application dated 02 July 2019 [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME], the Tenant, referred to the Tribunal a Notice of Increase of rent served by the Landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 dated 20 June 2019 which proposed a rent of £160.00 per week including services and water charges of £36.41 per week and Council Tax of £12.24 per week with effect from 22 July 2019 in place of the passing rent stated to be £105.00 per week.
2. The Tenancy is an Assured Periodic Tenancy formed by holding over a weekly tenancy that commenced in April 2004. There is no tenancy agreement.
3. The Tribunal issued Directions dated 12 July 2019 informing the parties (para 2) that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of an inspection of the property and written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No request was made, so the Tribunal proceeded to determine the case based on its inspection and any documents received.
Inspection
4. The Tribunal members inspected the property on 23 August 2019 as arranged accompanied by the Tenant (The Landlord was not represented), the weather was fine and sunny.
5. The property comprises a third floor room with shared facilities approached from a communal hall and stairs. The accommodation comprises: A small Bed-sitting Room with kitchen facilities. There are shared facilities approached via the communal hall: Two Showers, Separate W.C. with washbasin. No outside space. The building was probably built as an hotel. The shared facilities and common ways would appear to have been recently refurbished.
6. The Landlord may have supplied some carpets and some furniture originally but this is now in worn condition and adds nothing to the rental value. Fittings are satisfactory.
Representations
7. The Landlord requested a variation of Directions consisting of a written submission and documents in support of the service charges and the Tribunal took this to be its statement of case.
8. The Tenant points out in her representations that the fixed amounts included in the passing rent were misquoted by the Landlord as Nil. [NAME] [RESPONDENT] says that the previous Tribunal, in 2017, fixed the rent as including a fixed amount of £13.00 for water charges and service charges. She also states that since that decision increases of £16.5o have been charged. [NAME] [NAME] pays for her own electricity direct and has a separate meter.
3 The Law and Valuation
9. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Landlord or the Tenant cannot be relevant to this issue and have not been taken into account.
10. Although the Landlord submitted documents intended to support the service charge and Council Tax amounts these are under the control of the Landlord and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The amounts stated are fixed as part of the rent and are not variable during the rental period.
11. Thus in the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today on the terms and in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
12. Neither party provided any evidence of rental values so using its own knowledge and experience the Tribunal concluded that an appropriate open market rental value for the room with shared facilities would be £125.00 per week on an all-inclusive basis.
13. This rent needs to be adjusted to take account of the fact that the tenant has to pay for her own electricity. In the Tribunal’s view £5.00 per week needs to be deducted to allow for this. (This allowance represents our opinion of the lower bid that would be made by a hypothetical tenant considering renting this room compared to one where the rent includes electricity).
14. This leaves a net market rent of £120.00 per week including the fixed charge for services and water charges of £36.41 per week and Council Tax of £12.24 per week. This new rent is to include the amounts for service charges, water charges and Council Tax and is a fixed sum.
Determination
15. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject room might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £120.00 per week including fixed services water charges and Council Tax.
16. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £120.00 per week including the fixed water and service charge of £36.41 and Council Tax of £12.24 to take effect from 22 July 2019 being the date specified in the Landlord’s notice as stated on the decision form.
[NAME] (Chairman)
23 August 2019
4 PERMISSION TO APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Open Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenanc…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £1,050.00 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £910 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Flat Based on Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenant Based on Open Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Brighton Bedsit
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Rural Norfolk Flat
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property is in good condition.
- The rent is based strictly on the open market value without additional costs.
- The rent is described as a fair market rent.
- The location and condition of the property are considered.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The property is not maintained in good condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on an open market valuation.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on an inspection of the property and an assessment of its market value, considering the property's condition and the tenant's payment for utilities.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the open market valuation of the property, which included the condition of the property and the tenant's payment for utilities.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than the landlord had proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the open market value of their property when disputing rent increases.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included an inspection of the property and written representations from both parties.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
