First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition, location, and market value to set the rent at £675.00 per month, starting April 1, 2021.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the open market value of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the property's condition and location.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value, taking into account the property's condition and location. The rent was set at £675.00 per calendar month, effective from April 1, 2021.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/18UK/MNR/2021/0007
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 Annery Kiln Cottage, Weare Giffard, Bideford, Devon, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 50 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 675.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 September 2017
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT]
8. Description of premises Terrace House.
[NAME] of Decision 26 March 2021
1
Case Reference : CHI/18UK/MNR/2021/0007
Property : 3 Annery Kiln Cottage, Weare Giffard, Devon [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 29th January 2021
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
Date
: 26th March 2021
_______________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 26th March 2021 in the sum of £675.00 per calendar month (pcm).
2. By an application dated 29th January 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 29th December 2020 proposed a rent of £750.00 pcm. with effect from 1st April 2021, in place of the current rent of £650.00 pcm.
4. The application form states the tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement dated the 29th of August 2017 commenced on the 1st of September 2017 and runs thereafter from year to year. The tenancy is in the standard form for this type of tenancy and subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 16th February 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in the village of Weare Giffard on the River Torridge in North Devon to the south of Bideford.
8. The property comprises an unfurnished terrace house with central heating but no double glazing and including carpets and white goods.
9. The accommodation comprises: Seven rooms. The Tribunal was given no details of the layout of the property by either party and how the rooms are occupied.
10. There are gardens, an open garage and shed. There is off street parking.
11. No specific information was provided to the Tribunal with regard to the supply of utilities. In the absence of any other information the Tribunal has assumed that mains, water and electricity to be connected. Gas fired central heating.
12. Drainage is to a septic tank for which the [APPELLANT] is responsible to pay the annual charge of £150.00.
Hearing 13. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal
3
14. Tribunal Directions dated 16th February 2021.
15. [RESPONDENT]: Tribunal Reply Form, witness statement.
16. [APPELLANT]: Application, Tenancy Agreemnt and Reply Form.
17. Late application dated 26th March 2021 (the day of consideration) by the [APPELLANT] requesting that information be added onto her submission and a reply from the [RESPONDENT] by email on the morning of the consideration objecting to such submission.
[RESPONDENT]'s Representations 18. The [RESPONDENT] says in the Reply Form (summarised):
19. Before renting the property a new kitchen and log burner were installed.
20. The entire property was renovated inside and out including flooring and carpets.
21. The garden was renovated with new decking and patio.
22. The property is 200 years old Grade II listed in the peaceful picturesque village of Weare Giffard. The area is very desirable and rents as well as property prices in general are above average.
23. Undated photographs showing the property fully furnished.
24. In support of the proposed rent 2 comparables are provided in Bideford (within 10 miles of the subject property) at asking rents of £750.00 and 900.00 pcm.
[APPELLANT]'s Representations 25. In the application and the Reply Form the [APPELLANT] said that the property, having been previously rented, was not renovated before she moved in.
26. The [APPELLANT] had carried out the following: Interior decoration and installed TV aerial. [NAME] had provided 10 energy efficient light bulbs.
27. The [APPELLANT] contends in her letter to the Tribunal dated 19th March 2021 that the rent should be £600.00 pcm. By way of evidence the [APPELLANT] included details of three similar properties available to rent within 1 mile of the subject property at rents ranging from £495.00 to £625.00 pcm.
28. Other matters (summarised) the [APPELLANT] would like the Tribunal to consider:
a) No Section 21 issued giving the [APPELLANT] notice to leave. b) An email was received on 20th October 2020 asking the [APPELLANT] to vacate as the property was sold and would complete before Christmas,
4
giving the [APPELLANT] two months to find alternative accommodation for her and her two daughters in the middle of Covid restrictions. c) An email dated 22nd October 2020 saying 'we have given you three months notice and need you out of the property before Christmas'. d) 30th December Section21 Notice issued.
e) 5th February 2021. Gas Safety Certificate issued with warning notice (no carbon monoxide detectors). f) 18th February 2021. Second Section 21 Notice issued. Legally required to vacate by 30th August 2021. g) Repair issues: Bathroom light flickering and shower tripping circuit, mushrooms growing out of window frames, carbon monoxide leak in 2019, rotten decking, crack in wall, leaking outside pipes and guttering. h) The [RESPONDENT] has carried out no work to the interior or exterior. i) Deposit not put into the Tenancy Deposit Scheme. j) The proposed rent increase is to deliberately force me into arrears. k) Photographs showing the damp in walls and rotten window frames.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 29. The Tribunal may proceed to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an assured tenancy.
30. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
31. The Tribunal noted the late application to submit further evidence and the [RESPONDENT]'s objection. The application was made on the morning before the consideration was due to start at 10.00 leaving no time for the [RESPONDENT] to reply to the late application. The Tribunal having regard to its overriding objective to deal with the matter fairly and justly refuses the application. See Appendix (below): Rule 3 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 as amended.
32. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or [RESPONDENT] are not relevant to this issue.
33. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property had a certificate registered at Rating D valid until 2030. A property offered to let must have a certificate with a rating of at least the legal minimum standard (Rating E).
34. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. In this case, if offered today in the market, the property would require enhancement and an upgraded inventory to include white goods.
35. The Tribunal considered the comparable evidence supplied by the parties. It noted the limited analysis and comparison to the subject
5
property and accordingly treated such evidence with caution. Further the Tribunal noted that the [RESPONDENT]'s and [APPELLANT]'s evidence was drawn from a 10 mile radius.
36. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions, the arrangement of the accommodation and the defects identified by the [APPELLANT], determined that the market rent for the subject property is £675.00 pcm.
37. The rent will take effect from 1st April 2021 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 38. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
39. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking
6
Appendix Tribunal Procedure (First-tier)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 as amended Overriding objective and parties’ obligation to co-operate with the Tribunal
3.(1) The overriding objective of these Rules is to enable the Tribunal to deal with cases fairly and justly.
(2) Dealing with a case fairly and justly includes— (a) dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate to the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues, the anticipated costs and the resources of the parties and of the Tribunal; (b) avoiding unnecessary formality and seeking flexibility in the proceedings; (c) ensuring, so far as practicable, that the parties are able to participate fully in the proceedings; (d) using any special expertise of the Tribunal effectively; and (e) avoiding delay, so far as compatible with proper consideration of the issues.
(3) The Tribunal must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when it— (a) exercises any power under these Rules; or (b) interprets any rule or practice direction.
(4)Parties must— (a) help the Tribunal to further the overriding objective; and (b) co-operate with the Tribunal generally.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £1,050.00 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £910 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Open Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenanc…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Flat Based on Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Room in Shared House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Due to Property Condit…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets rent at £565 pcm after reviewing disrepair claims
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £675.00 per calendar month.
- The proposed rent increase would take effect from April 1, 2021, as specified in the landlord's notice.
- The property's energy performance certificate had a D rating, which is above the legal minimum standard of E.
- The property's market value is sensitive to its condition and inventory, requiring enhancements and an upgraded inventory.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's late application to submit additional evidence was refused because it left no time for the landlord to reply.
- The tenant's claim that the property was not renovated before she moved in was not accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £675.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, considering its condition and location.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and location of the property were crucial in determining the rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set based on the open market value of their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the condition of the property, comparable rents in the area, and the terms of the tenancy agreement.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure your rights are protected.
