VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Due to Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal to reduce a proposed rent increase because the property was in poor condition and lacked certain amenities. The Tribunal agreed and set a new rent of £935.00 per month, effective from December 18, 2021, taking into account the property's condition and market standards.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant may request a reduction in rent if the property does not meet the standards expected for similar properties in the open market.

Topics

rent adjustmentassured tenancyproperty condition

Provisions

Housing Act 1988 s.14Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent increase based on the condition of the property and certain missing amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal reviewed a tenant's application to reduce a proposed rent increase due to the condition of the property and missing amenities. The Tribunal determined a new rent of £935.00 per calendar month, effective from December 18, 2021, considering the property's condition and market standards.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HA/MNR/2021/0144

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 13 Rotcombe Vale, High Littleton, Bristol, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT] [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 935.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 December 2021

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 September 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & [APPELLANT] 1985

7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT], cooker.

8. Description of premises 3 bedroom semi-detached house.

[NAME] of Decision 11 February 2022

1

Case Reference

: CHI/00HA//MNR/2021/0144

Property : 13 Rotcombe Vale, High Littleton, Bristol, [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

C/o [NAME].

Date of Application : 10th December 2021

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME]

: 11th February 2022

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 11th February 2022 will be £935.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 18th December 2021.

2. By an application dated 10th December 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 1st October 2021 proposed a rent of £1,000.00 pcm with effect from 18th December 2021, in place of the current rent of £850.00 pcm.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 18th September 2020. The tenancy is subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and [APPELLANT] 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 6th January 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. High Littleton is located in a residential area to the south of Bristol and south west of Bath.

8. The property comprises a double glazed centrally heated semi-detached house.

9. The accommodation comprises: Living Room/Dining Room, 3 bedrooms, kitchen, bathroom and W.C. Outside: Gardens and garage

10. The property is let part furnished: Carpets and cooker.

11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.

Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 6th January 2022.

14. [RESPONDENT]: Tribunal Reply Form.

15. [APPELLANT]: Application and Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement.

[RESPONDENT]'s Representations (summarised):

3

16. The [RESPONDENT] says in the Reply Form and attachments:

a) Not aware of any disrepair or defect. b) Condition: reasonable. c) 6 miles to Keynsham and 7 miles to Bath railway stations. d) There is a lack of comparables in the immediate area but within 3 miles there are several 3 bedroom properties at rents ranging from £950.00 to £1,200.00 pcm.

[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised) 17. The [APPELLANT] says in the Application and Reply Forms and email of enclosures dated 10th December 2021:

a) Curtains are not included. b) Front door is not double glazed. c) On moving (in 2020) in pre-arranged works had not been completed: property unhygienic, electric consumer unit wires hanging out, bathroom flaking paint and mould, kitchen and cooker greasy and dirty, carpets covered in dog hair, mould in bedrooms and front door ill fitting. d) The garden was overgrown and the garage full of rubbish. e) The [RESPONDENT] is seeking planning to develop a small part of the site which means we will lose the garage, parking and have the rent increased. f) The current rent of £850.00 pcm is more than enough.

18. Photographs are included showing the condition of the property, apparently taken at the time of moving in.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 19. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

20. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or [RESPONDENT] are not relevant to this issue.

21. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at C expiring on 26th June 2025. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.

22. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

23. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the [RESPONDENT] could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that

4

such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating above F would be £1,000.00 pcm.

24. It was not clear to the Tribunal whether or not the disrepair issues listed as being in issue at the commencement of the tenancy were still in issue. The Tribunal's interpretation of the [APPELLANT]'s comments in the Reply Form is that these matters are not currently in issue.

25. Further the Tribunal can only issue its determination on the basis of the information before it. It cannot assess what impact the proposed development may have on the future rent and apply it to the current rent. No comparable evidence was presented by the [APPELLANT] as to impact the development proposals may have on the current rent.

26. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property) determined to make a deduction in respect of issues identified by the [APPELLANT]:

a) Lack of fridge and washing machine: £25.00. b) Lack of curtains: £20.00 c) Part double glazing: £20.00

Total deduction £65.00 pcm

27. Accordingly the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £935.00 pcm.

28. The rent will take effect from 18th December 2021 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 29. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

30. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal [NAME] to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

5

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal reduced the rent because the property lacked a fridge and washing machine.
  • The rent was lowered due to the absence of curtains in the property.
  • The Tribunal made a deduction because the property was only partly double glazed.
  • The Tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £935.00 per calendar month.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal reduced the proposed rent increase to £935.00 per month, effective from December 18, 2021.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the condition of the property and the presence of certain amenities, adjusting the rent accordingly.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) Regulations 2015 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the absence of certain amenities.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also be able to request a rent adjustment based on the condition of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property taken at the time of moving in were important evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.