Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on the rent for a property based on its condition and market comparables. The tenant challenged the landlord's proposed rent increase, and the Tribunal set the rent at £775.00 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the property's condition and market value.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The tribunal considers factors such as the property's condition and market comparables when setting the rent.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for a property based on its condition and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal reviewed a notice of rent increase under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 and determined the rent based on the property's condition and market comparables.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UB/MNR/2021/0088
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 73b [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr R [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 22-24 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 775.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 August 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 November 2019
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT] machine, fridge cooker, carpets and curtains.
8. Description of premises Self contained ground floor 1 bedroom flat in a converted house.
Chairman Mr R [NAME] of Decision 29 September 2021
1
Case Reference
: CHI/43UB/MNR/2021/0088
Property : [ADDRESS], Walton on Thames, Surrey [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 29th July 2021
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 29th September 2021
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 29th September 2021 in the sum of £775.00 per calendar month.
2. By an application dated 29th July 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 14th June 2021 proposed a rent of £825.00 pcm. with effect from 1st August 2021, in place of the current rent of £775.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and commenced on 1st November 2019. The tenancy is subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 19th August 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and found as follows:
7. The property is located in a busy mixed use area fronting the busy main A3050 road. The garden backs on a car repair garage. Local amenities are available.
8. The property comprises a self contained ground floor flat.
9. The accommodation comprises: 1 living room, 1 bedroom, kitchen and bathroom. Outside rear garden.
10. Carpets , curtains, washing machine, fridge and cooker are included in the Tenancy.
11. The Tribunal understands that all mains services, except gas, are connected. There is central heating and double glazing.
Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 19th August 2021.
14. [RESPONDENT]: Nothing.
15. [APPELLANT]: Application and Reply Form, Notice of Increase, Tenancy agreement,
[RESPONDENT]'s Representations (summarised): 16. The [RESPONDENT] makes no representations.
3
[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised): 17. The [APPELLANT] says in the application and reply form:
a) Various works have been completed by the [RESPONDENT] through his agent: rear garden fence, leak from flat above, repairs to: kitchen sink tap, replacement cooker hood, and external waste pipe. b) The property is a ground floor conversion in a victorian building. c) The carpets, wall coverings, curtains and blind have all been in place prior to my tenancy as indicated by cigarette burns and stains. d) The kitchen fittings are old, poorly fitted and require resealing. Ceiling plaster is hanging down over the hob. The leak short circuited the electricity and flooded the kitchen. e) The bathroom fittings are badly fitted and worn, wall tiles are loose with grout missing. f) The boiler and thermostat are old and do not work properly. g) The thermal efficiency of the property is poor as it is only partially double glazed. h) Comparables are included at rents ranging from £700.00 to £900.00 pcm. The [APPELLANT] proposes £775.00 pcm.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 18. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or [RESPONDENT] are not relevant to this issue.
19. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice of rent increase was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
20. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject has a certificate rating the property's energy performance at E expiring on 10th February 2026. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is Rating E.
21. Based on the knowledge of its members, the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. The subject property appears to the Tribunal to be in condition that would not appeal to a prospective [APPELLANT].
22. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the [RESPONDENT] could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, curtains, cooker and an EPC Rating above F would be £900.00 pcm.
4
23. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property determined that the condition of the flat is below the standard that would usually be expected for a property of this type and makes the following deductions to reflect these matters:
a) Matters of disrepair itemised by the [APPELLANT] and evidenced in the photographs worn carpets and curtains £50.00 pcm. b) Lack of modernisation to kitchen and bathroom £50.00 pcm. c) Lack of modern central heating system £25.00 pcm.
24. This equates to a total deduction of £125.00 pcm.
25. Accordingly the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £775.00 pcm.
26. The rent will take effect from 1st August 2021 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 27. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
28. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Harrow Property Based on Condition and Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Room in Shared House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Case Summary
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £850.00 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets rent at £565 pcm after reviewing disrepair claims
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Due to Property Condit…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition, including worn carpets and curtains, justified a £50.00 per calendar month deduction.
- The lack of modernisation in the kitchen and bathroom led to a £50.00 per calendar month deduction.
- The absence of a modern central heating system resulted in a £25.00 per calendar month deduction.
- The Tribunal considered the market for this type of property to be very sensitive to its condition and inventory.
- The property's energy performance rating of E, which is the legal minimum standard, was noted by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent for the property at £775.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) Regulations 2015 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and market comparables were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also challenge a rent increase notice based on the property's condition and market comparables.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and market comparables mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
