VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £625.00 per month, considering the property's condition and local market rates.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent set at a reasonable market rate considering the property's condition and amenities.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

Housing Act 1988 s.14Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the property's condition and amenities, among other factors.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and property features.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions, property condition, and amenities. The rent was set at £625.00 per calendar month, effective from 18 March 2021. The decision was made by Mr R Brown, Mr M Donaldson, and Mr M Woodrow.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HC/MNR/2021/0015

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [NAME]

[RESPONDENT] [NAME] 44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 625.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 March 2021

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 April 2018

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & [APPELLANT] 1985

7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT]

8. Description of premises First Floor Flat without central heating.

[NAME] of Decision 9 April 2021

1

Case Reference : CHI/00HC/MNR/2021/0015

Property : 7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 16th February 2021

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]

: 9th April 2021

_______________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 9th April 2021 in the sum of £625.00 per calendar month (pcm).

2. By an application dated 16th February 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 29th January 2021 proposed a rent of £675.00 pcm. with effect from 18th March 2021, in place of the current rent of £585.00 pcm.

4. The assured shorthold tenancy agreement dated 4th April 2018 for an initial term of 12 months commencing 18th April 2018, is in standard form and subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and [APPELLANT] 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 10th March 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located residential area of mixed dwellings. All local amenities available.

8. The property comprises a furnished first floor flat with double glazing, carpets, curtains and white goods, but no central heating.

9. The accommodation comprises: 1 living room, 2 bedrooms, bathroom and kitchen.

10. There is a garden accessed via the side of the property. There is no off street parking.

11. No specific information was provided to the Tribunal with regard to the supply of utilities. In the absence of any other information the Tribunal has assumed that mains water, drainage and electricity to be connected.

Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.

13. The Tribunal having reviewed the papers did not consider that it needed to review the Directions which indicated that this case could be considered on the papers presented without a hearing.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 14. Tribunal Directions dated 10th March 2021.

3

15. [RESPONDENT]: Tribunal Reply Form, witness statement.

16. [APPELLANT]: Application, Tenancy Agreement and inventory (excluding photographs referred to), Notice of Increase, and Statement.

[RESPONDENT]'s Representations 17. The [RESPONDENT] says in the Reply Form and statement (summarised):

18. That there is an ongoing dispute with the [APPELLANT] in relation to repair of the front door and the level of condensation caused in his opinion by the use of an old fashioned tumble drier venting into the property.

19. The [RESPONDENT] disagrees with the Tenants comments that: a) the [APPELLANT] does not pay for gardening. b) the [APPELLANT] asked for permission to decorate. c) the [RESPONDENT] disagrees that the repair of the front door is his responsibility as it was the result of a visit from the police. d) there is 'free standing heating'. e) a smoke alarm is installed.

20. At the bottom of the Notice of Increase, the [RESPONDENT] says that on 27th January 2021 there were 14 properties listed on [NAME] at rents ranging between £650.00 and £1,204.00 pcm.

21. After discounting the three flats quoted as over £1,000.00 the average rent is £738.18 pcm.

22. There has been no increase in the rent since the [APPELLANT] moved in 3 years ago.

23. Brief details of seven of the comparables used were provided which were advertised as available to rent at rents ranging between £625.00 and £900.00 pcm.

[APPELLANT]'s Representations 24. The [APPELLANT] says in the Application and Statement (summarised):

25. The rent increase should be to £600.00 pcm. This reflects the current properties on the market which have the advantage of central heating. All appear to be in converted property at rents ranging from £565.00 to £625.00 pcm.

26. During the tenancy the [APPELLANT] had redecorated all rooms.

27. The property has been in disrepair since the [APPELLANT] moved in. A mutual agreement brokered via mediation by the Private Rented Housing Team of [NAME] following a conversation with both parties on 26 November 2020 meant a full [NAME] assessment would not be undertaken by the Council on the basis that the [RESPONDENT] would undertake the following works by 25 February 2021:

4

a) Install a fixed permanent heating system. b) Overhaul main door and frame. c) Insulate the loft conforming to BS5083 Part 1. d) Comply with the Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Regulations. e) Remedy the damp in the flat and replaster as necessary. f) Provide a report on the condition of the wiring and undertake any necessary work to comply with current regulations. g) Provide a new Energy Performance Certificate after the work is complete. At the time the rating was F.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 28. The Tribunal may proceed to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an assured tenancy.

29. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

30. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or [RESPONDENT] are not relevant to this issue.

31. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property had a rating of C and a certificate expiring in 2030. A property offered to let must have a certificate with a rating of at least the legal minimum standard (Rating E).

32. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

33. It appeared to the Tribunal that some of the work required by [NAME] may have been completed as the property now has an Energy Performance Certificate Rating of C (assessed on the 7th December 2020). Neither party explained which works of those required by [NAME] had been completed and accordingly the Tribunal has to make a judgement on this point. It is not clear whether or not the planned upgraded heating system has been installed as the [RESPONDENT] states in his ‘Reply Form’ that the work was due to commence on 22nd March 2021. As the effective date of this determination is 18th March 2021, the Tribunal assumes for the purpose of this determination, that the heating work has not been completed.

34. The Tribunal considered the comparable evidence supplied by the parties.

35. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions, the arrangement of the accommodation and the defects identified by the [APPELLANT], determined that the market rent for the subject property is £625.00 pcm.

5

36. The rent will take effect from 18th March 2021 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 37. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

38. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking

Appendix Tribunal Procedure (First-tier)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 as amended Overriding objective and parties’ obligation to co-operate with the Tribunal

6

3.(1) The overriding objective of these Rules is to enable the Tribunal to deal with cases fairly and justly.

(2) Dealing with a case fairly and justly includes— (a) dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate to the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues, the anticipated costs and the resources of the parties and of the Tribunal; (b) avoiding unnecessary formality and seeking flexibility in the proceedings; (c) ensuring, so far as practicable, that the parties are able to participate fully in the proceedings; (d) using any special expertise of the Tribunal effectively; and (e) avoiding delay, so far as compatible with proper consideration of the issues.

(3) The Tribunal must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when it— (a) exercises any power under these Rules; or (b) interprets any rule or practice direction.

(4)Parties must— (a) help the Tribunal to further the overriding objective; and (b) co-operate with the Tribunal generally.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant challenged a rent increase under a specific legal provision.
  • The tenant requested a reduction in rent due to the property not meeting market standards.
  • The tenant was entitled to a rent determination reflecting the property's condition and market value.
  • The tenant was granted a fair market rent based on the property's condition and market conditions.
  • The tenant received a rent set by the Tribunal considering the property's condition and market rates.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors listed as all similar cases favored the claimant)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £625.00 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition, amenities, and local market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition and amenities of the property were crucial in determining the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than the landlord proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition and local market rates when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the tenancy agreement, property inspection reports, and comparable rental prices.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.