Tribunal Sets New Rent for Room in Shared House
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a new rent for a room in a shared house. They considered the property's condition and market conditions to set the rent at £665.00 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent based on the property's condition and market conditions.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable rent based on the property's condition and market conditions, considering the terms of the existing tenancy except for the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new rent for a room in a shared house based on market conditions and the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent for a room in a shared house based on market conditions and the property's condition, setting the rent at £665.00 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HD/MNR/2021/0093
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr R [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY] c/o [COMPANY], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 665.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 September 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 August 2018
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT] – white goods, carpets throughout, basic furniture in common areas.
8. Description of premises En-suite room in a shared house (5 rooms). Centrally heated and double glazed.
Chairman Mr R [NAME] of Decision 14 October 2021
1
Case Reference
: CHI/00HD/MNR/2021/0093
Property
: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
Date of Application : 10th August 2021
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 14th October 2021
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 14th October 2021 in the sum of £665.00 per calendar month (pcm).
2. By an application received on 8th August 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 3rd August 2021 proposed a rent of £695.00 pcm with effect from 18th September 2021, in place of the current rent of £595.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. No tenancy agreement was provided but the Tribunal is informed the tenancy commenced on 18th August 2018. The tenancy is subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 10th September 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located on a newly developed residential area to the North of Bristol City centre.
8. The property comprises a room in a modern centrally heated double glazed house comprising 5 the [APPELLANT] says 6 letting rooms and shared facilities which include: kitchen/diner, utility room, communal bathroom and WC. Outside: garden, garage (shared storage) and off street parking for 2 cars.
9. The accommodation comprises an en-suite bed sitting room with shared facilities for cooking and washing (washing machine, cooker and fridge).
10. Carpets and curtains are included and the common areas are furnished. The kitchen is fully fitted with white goods and crockery cutlery etc.
11. The room rent includes council tax, gas, water, electricity and broadband.
12. The Tribunal is informed that all mains services are connected.
Hearing 13. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 14. Tribunal Directions dated 10th September 2021.
15. [RESPONDENT]: Reply Form.
3
16. [APPELLANT]: Application Form, Notice of Increase, Tenancy Heads of Terms, Reply Form and photographs.
[RESPONDENT]'s Representations (summarised): 17. The [RESPONDENT] says:
a) Room 4 is en-suite.
b) Crockery, pots, pans and cutlery are provided. There is a freezer, ironing board and hoover.
c) [NAME] attend monthly (April to November).
d) Cleaners (communal areas) once or twice per month.
e) [RESPONDENT] pays Council Tax, Energy, Water, TV licence, Cleaners and [NAME].
f) The house is in good repair and fairly new. There are 5 occupants sharing the property.
g) The ingoing check in is attached with photos.
h) The property is well located close to Tesco and Retail Centre. Minutes from the M4/M5/M32 and Network rail.
i) There has been no increase in rent since 18/08/2018.
j) The [RESPONDENT] maintains the property and accepts fair wear and tear.
k) Room Values are now higher and details of rents from £675.00 to £725.00 pcm are attached.
[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised) 18. In the Application and Reply Form the [APPELLANT] says:
a) He has repaired the curtain rails, walls plugs. Removed abandoned items from previous [APPELLANT].
b) Removed insect nests from common areas that should have been cleaned by the [RESPONDENT].
c) The dishwasher supplied 2 years ago has never worked.
d) Photographs (undated) show: Dirt on skirting boards and underneath units, a blocked sink and dirty dishwasher.
e) The communal areas are not regularly cleaned.
d) The kitchen sink is constantly blocked (Currently blocked for 2 weeks).
4
e) Despite requests the aerial in the [APPELLANT]'s room has been broken since 2018.
f) The roof of the garden seating area has collapsed.
g) The [APPELLANT]'s mattress which was stored in the garage was damaged by the [RESPONDENT]'s agent.
h) Only 2 parking spaces are provided and this is inadequate for the property.
i) [NAME] is 2 -3 miles away and Patchway is about 2 miles (but undesirable as it is poorly lit and rundown).
j) [COMPANY] is 4/5 miles away.
k) [NAME] are run down and there is no local social life. a taxi to the city centre costs £30.00 to £40.00.
l) 6-7 people sharing the house is excessive.
m)Other 'rooms in house shares' in the locality range from £500.00 to £620.00 per person per month. The [APPELLANT] suggests £550.00 to £575.00 is a fairer figure.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 19. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an assured tenancy. The Tribunal does not take into consideration the personal circumstances of the [RESPONDENT] or [APPELLANT] in making its determination (including issues between [RESPONDENT] and [APPELLANT] which do not affect the rental value of the property itself).
20. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice of rent increase was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
21. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at C expiring on 27th June 2031. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is Rating E.
22. Based on the knowledge of its members, the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
23. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the [RESPONDENT] could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property (a room in a shared house) in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. The Tribunal noted the parties comments on the comparables and the accommodation provided. Having done so, it concluded that a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating,
5
modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, curtains, all white goods and an EPC Rating above F would be £700.00 pcm.
24. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property concluded that a deduction form this figure was appropriate to reflect: a) Lack on cleanliness to common areas and the issues identified by the [APPELLANT]: £35.00 pcm 25. Accordingly the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £665.00 pcm.
26. The rent will take effect from 18th September 2021 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 27. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
28. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Due to Property Condit…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets rent at £565 pcm after reviewing disrepair claims
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Neglected Property Based on Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £850.00 PCM for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent based on the property's condition.
- The tenant can request a reduction in rent if the property does not meet market standards.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent considering the property's condition and disrepair.
- The tenant can challenge a landlord's proposed rent increase under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent set by the Tribunal based on market conditions and the property's condition.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new rent for a room in a shared house at £665.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) Regulations 2015 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and value of the property in the current market were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market conditions when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and descriptions of the property's condition were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
