AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·24 June 2025

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent and Allocates Repairs for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent amount and who is responsible for repairs in an assured periodic tenancy, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined and repair liabilities allocated according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationrepair liabilities

Provisions

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering factors such as the type of tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy and allocated repair liabilities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy and allocated repair liabilities between the landlord and tenant, following the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/30UH/MNR/2025/0645

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Lancaster [POSTCODE]

J.M.Going J.Faulkner FRICS

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] c/o [NAME], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT].[APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £875 Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 16 February 2025

3. Date assured shorthold tenancy commenced 16 June 2022

4. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

5. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

6. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None referred to, apart from a wardrobe. The letting does however include carpets and curtains, light shades and a fully equipped kitchen, with an oven, washing machine and fridge.

7. Description of premises The property, built approximately 50 years ago, is a small two-storey detached house with small gardens either side. It is conveniently located approximately 10 minutes’ walk from the centre of Lancaster, but has only pedestrian access via a flight of 7 steps. The tiled roof is double pitched. The external walls are rendered. Windows are UPVC double glazed. Accommodation comprises: A small kitchen and a living/dining room on the ground floor with a bathroom/WC and 2 bedrooms (one double; one single) upstairs.

Chairman J.M.Going Date of Decision 9 May 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

The tribunal determined the monthly rent to be £875, excluding water rates and council tax.
The decision on rent and repair liabilities takes effect on 16 February 2025.
Liability for repairs is allocated according to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The letting includes carpets, curtains, light shades, and a fully equipped kitchen with appliances.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent at £875 and allocated repair responsibilities between the landlord and tenant.

Who was involved?

The landlord and tenant were involved in the dispute over rent and repair responsibilities.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court followed the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent and allocate repair liabilities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to set the rent and allocate repair responsibilities.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent and repair liabilities.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent and allocating repair responsibilities.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent and repair responsibilities.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included details about the property and the terms of the tenancy agreement.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.