First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £2,200 per Month
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £2,200 per month after considering comparable properties in the area and the current state of the property. The tribunal noted that the property was poorly maintained but still had good-sized rooms.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a reasonable market rate based on the property's condition and comparable properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they are paying. However, the application cannot be made if the rent has already been determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market, taking into account the condition of the property and any improvements or damages caused by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering market rates and property condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy to be £2,200 per month, considering market rates and property condition. The tenant argued financial hardship and poor maintenance of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00BH/MNR/2023/0253
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 224 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge Tagliavini Mr J Naylor FRICS FRIPM
Landlord [NAME] 51 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 2200.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 03 November 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable N/A Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 April 2020
6. Length of the term or rental period 12 months
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act applies
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A 3 bed end of terrace house circa 1900’s. Small garden to front and garden at rear. Through lounge, breakfast room and kitchen on ground floor. Three bedrooms and bathroom/w.c. on first floor.
Chairman Judge Tagliavini Date of Decision 3rd November 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BH/MNR/2023/0253 Tenant : Ms [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] : 224 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Statement of Reasons for decision dated 3 November 2023 : 21 November 2023
STATEMENT OF REASONS ON AN [NAME] FOR DETERMINATION OF A MARKET RENT UNDER S. 13 AND 14 OF THE HOUSING ACT 1988.
2 Background
1. The Tribunal has received an [NAME] from the tenant, referring a Notice of Increase in Rent. The [NAME] is made under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act).
2. By a section 13 Housing Act 1988 landlord’s notice proposing a rent increase dated 6 April 2023, the [NAME] sought to increase the rent from £2,100 to £2,600 per month with effect from 18 June 2023.
3. The applicant is the assured shorthold tenant under a written agreement for a period of 12 months with effect from 18 April 2021 at a rent of £2,100 per month.
4. The subject property is a three bedroom end of terrace house circa 1900’s with bathroom/w.c. on first floor and through lounge, breakfast room and kitchen on the ground floor. There is a small garden to the front of the house and a larger rear garden.
The hearing
5. The applicant attended the hearing and was represented by Ms [APPELLANT] of [NAME]. The [NAME] did not attend and was not represented and no representations were received from the respondent by the tribunal.
6. At the hearing, Ms [RESPONDENT] submitted the property fell into the lower range of the rental market for this type of property within the area, as the bundle of comparable properties compiled, showed rents ranged from £2,200 to £2,300 per month. Ms [NAME] also submitted the proposed increase in rent is unreasonable and that due to the applicant’s financial hardship, the tribunal should exercise its discretion and not apply the increase either at all or as at the date stated in the Notice of Increase. Ms [NAME] also stated the rent should be £2,000 per month, as the applicant would not otherwise be able to afford it as she is reliant on unemployment and disability benefits.
Inspection
7. The tribunal carried out an inspection of the subject property and found it to be a poorly maintained property, both externally and internally and in a poor decorative state. The tribunal found the kitchen to be outdated and in need of modernisation and the bathroom/w.c. small and without provision for good ventilation. Although the tribunal found the house to be partially double-glazed, there were large gaps around both the front and rear doors and that the cellar area was damp
The tribunal’s reasons for its decision dated 3 November 2023
8. Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 states:
3
(1)Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to the appropriate tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the appropriate tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the appropriate tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a)which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b)which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c)the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d)in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2)In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a)any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b)any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i)was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii)was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c)any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3)For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1)
4 above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a)that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b)that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c)that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
9. The tribunal found that any increase to the rent should be minimal having regard to the poor state of disrepair and lack of modernisation to the kitchen. However, the tribunal found the rooms in the property to be of a good size (with the exception of the bathroom/w.c.) and having regard to the comparable properties in the area, it considers an increase of £100 per month from £2,100 to £2,200 per month reflects the market rent for this type of property in its current state.
10. The tribunal accepted the applicant’s representations as to undue hardship in respect of the effective start date of any rent increase. The tribunal, therefore, determined the date of increase should be the date of the tribunal’s decision pursuant to section 14(7) of the Housing Act 1988, and not the date stated in the landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Name: Judge Tagliavini
Date: 21 November 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
5 If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-[NAME]-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Unfurnished Flat in Scotswood
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,125 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1680 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1875 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy in Gateshead
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1,800 After Considering Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Rent should be set at a reasonable market rate based on the property's condition and comparable properties.
- Rent adjustments should consider the specific conditions of the property.
- Landlord must refer to comparable properties to determine the open market rent.
- Rent should be set according to the Housing Act 1988.
- Fair market rent should be adjusted based on the condition and comparables of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £2,200 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal considered market rates and property condition to determine the fair rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 s.14 was applied in determining the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant argued financial hardship and poor maintenance of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent increase than proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can argue financial hardship and property condition to negotiate a fairer rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable rental prices and the state of repair of the property were key pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
