VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Decision — Case 4162494

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal determined the monthly rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £700 per month, excluding water rates and council tax but including any additional amounts specified.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the Housing Act 1988, Section 14, which was applied in this case to set the rent at £700 per month.

Topics

tenancyrent assessment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £700 per calendar month, excluding certain charges but including others as specified in the Housing Act 1988, Section 14.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal assessed the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, setting it at £700 per month. The decision took effect on December 1, 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property ChamberFile Ref No. MAN/00EH/MNR/2023/0425

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 4 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] (No 6) [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT], 2 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £700.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 December 2023

3. The amount included for services is: not applicable

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 August 2019

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Standard – Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 S11

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Unfurnished.

8. Description of premises Modern Mid-Terrace House, 1 Reception, 3 Bedroom, Kitchen, Bathroom, plus GF WC, plus Single Garage.

[NAME] of Decision 15 January 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £700.00 per calendar month.
  • The tribunal's decision regarding the rent took effect from 1 December 2023.
  • The property was described as a modern mid-terrace house with specific rooms and a single garage.
  • The tenancy was an assured periodic tenancy that commenced on 1 August 2019.
  • The landlord was liable for repairs according to Section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £700 per month, effective from December 2023.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about setting the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at the correct amount.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £700 per month, effective from December 2023, based on the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, setting the rent at £700 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined according to the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.