VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy between a landlord and tenant under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision sets the monthly rent at £900, excluding water rates and council tax but including other specified amounts.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord is entitled to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy in accordance with Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision sets out a monthly rent of £900, effective from March 30, 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0054

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 85 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

I D Humphries B.Sc. FRICS J Arain

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 11 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] and [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £900 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 30.03.23

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 30.03.22

5. Length of the term or rental period 12 months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs S. 11

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Victorian three bedroom terraced house

Chairman I D Humphries FRICS Date of Decision 01.08.23

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The landlord is entitled to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy in accordance with Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord is entitled to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, which allows for rent determination under assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The application of Section 14 to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy was central to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision is neutral, setting out the terms agreed upon by both parties.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek determination of rent under Section 14 if there's no agreement between landlord and tenant.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The application form and any relevant tenancy agreements would have been considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

A decision on rent determination can typically be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.