VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy. The landlord requested a determination of rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, and the tribunal set it at £695 per month excluding water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord is entitled to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy in accordance with Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, setting it at £695 per month excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CJ/MNR/2023/0186

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] 2 Queensway, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £695.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 4 July 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 June 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs s11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises First floor flat comprising living room / kitchen, 1 bedroom and bathroom

[NAME] of Decision 18 July 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord is entitled to determine the rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • Rent should be set at a reasonable market rate based on comparable properties and the condition of the property.
  • Tenants are entitled to a fair determination of their rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • Tenants can have their rent set by a First-tier Tribunal if they dispute it with their landlord.
  • Tenants are entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A landlord requested a determination of rent, and a tenant was affected by the decision.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal followed Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 to set the rent at £695 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was used to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The landlord's request for a rent determination under Section 14 was central to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

A tenant can expect their rent to be determined according to Section 14 if requested by the landlord.

What evidence or documents mattered?

No specific evidence is mentioned, but the application of Section 14 was key.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.