First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £875 per month. The decision was based on Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, which allows landlords to determine the rent for such tenancies.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy in accordance with Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy period, and ensures that the terms of the tenancy remain consistent except for the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, setting a monthly rate excluding water and council tax.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CS/MNR/2023/0127
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT], 145 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £875 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 22 June 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable - Per -
4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 22 March 2018
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 LTA 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Not applicable
9. Description of premises Modern 2 storey semi-detached house comprising open plan living room/ kitchen, downstairs WC, 2 double bedrooms and family bathroom. Garden to rear and one parking space to front.
Chairman Nicholas Wint FRICS Date of Decision 24 October 2023
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £900
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £875 per month.
- The decision on the rent will take effect from 22 June 2023.
- The property is a modern two-storey semi-detached house with specific features.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the monthly rent at £875 for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A landlord and a tenant were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, which allows landlords to set rent for assured periodic tenancies.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The landlord's right to determine rent under Section 14 was the central issue.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant, setting a higher rent than previously agreed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should review Section 14 of the Housing Act to understand their rights and obligations regarding rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The tenancy agreement and relevant sections of the Housing Act were key documents.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.