VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Rent Assessment Committee has determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The rent is set at £129.75 per week, starting from 1 April 2024. This decision was made by Judge C.P. Tonge and Mrs S.A. Kendall, adhering to the guidelines set forth by the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

The tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent assessmentassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar periodic tenancy in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set by the Rent Assessment Committee.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Rent Assessment Committee decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £129.75 per week, effective from 1 April 2024. The decision was made by Judge C.P. Tonge and Mrs S.A. Kendall, following the procedures under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 Rent Assessment Panel File Ref No. MAN/00CG/MNR/2024/0086

Notice of the Rent Assessment Committee Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises

The Committee members were 21 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge C. P. Tonge LLB, BA Mrs S. A. Kendall BSc, MRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT]

PO Box 2070, Preston, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms. [APPELLANT]. [APPELLANT]. [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £129.75 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024 (Monday)

*3. The amount included for services is £1.68 Per week

*4.

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 11 September 2001 (Monday)

6. Length of the term or rental period 6 months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

Nil. Open market rent (excluding service charge) calculated on a per month basis £850, with £295 deducted and services added.

9. Description of premises

Semi-detached house, with three bedrooms, kitchen/dining room and lounge

Chairman Judge C. P. Tonge Date of Decision 11 June 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to statutory guidelines.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment taking into account the condition of the property and improvements made by the tenant.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed by the Rent Assessment Committee under the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment when the property is not in the condition expected of a modern market let and the tenant is experiencing financial hardship.
  • A willing landlord can expect to let the property for £900 per calendar month.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £129.75 per week.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved, with the Rent Assessment Committee making the decision.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court followed the procedures outlined in the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to assess the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the appropriate rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set according to the law.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is assessed according to the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the property and the tenancy agreement were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.