VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal has decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The rent was set at £735 per month, starting from October 19th, 2024. This decision follows the statutory process outlined in the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to statutory procedures.

Topics

rent assessmentassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set by the Rent Assessment Committee.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Rent Assessment Committee determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £735 per calendar month, effective from 19th October 2024. The decision was made by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

MR22 Rent Assessment Panel File Ref No. MAN/00CC/MNR/2024/0637

Notice of the Rent Assessment Committee Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises

The Committee members were 6 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tribunal Judge J.E. Oliver Tribunal Member [NAME]

Landlord [NAME]

C/o [APPELLANT] 6-8 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £735 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 19th October 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 19th August 2023

5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs

As per tenancy agreement

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

None

8. Description of premises 1st floor duplex within a development of 3 town houses and 6 flats. The Property is within a block of 4 flats within a converted Methodist Chapel. On the ground floor there is a kitchen diner, hallway with cloakroom/WC, living room and double bedroom. On the upper floor is a bathroom with bath, WC, sink and shower and a second double bedroom.

Chairman J.E Oliver Date of Decision 8th January 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent for the property was determined to be £735 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the rent assessment takes effect from October 19, 2024.
  • The property is a first-floor duplex within a converted Methodist Chapel, featuring two double bedrooms.
  • The assured tenancy for the premises began on August 19, 2023.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £735 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved, with the First-tier Tribunal making the decision.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court followed the statutory process to determine the rent, ensuring fairness and compliance with the law.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to assess the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the statutory process for determining the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was neutral, applying the statutory process to determine the rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should expect their rent to be assessed according to the statutory process.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The statutory process and relevant documentation were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.