VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Semi-Detached House in Derby

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a rent of £165 per week for a semi-detached house in Derby. They took into account the condition of the property and the tenant's financial situation.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent level that reflects the property's condition and the tenant's ability to pay.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancyproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable rent level that reflects the property's condition and the tenant's ability to pay, among other factors.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a weekly rent of £165 for a semi-detached house in Derby, considering the property's condition and the tenant's financial hardship.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a weekly rent of £165 for a semi-detached house in Derby, taking into account the property's condition and the tenant's financial hardship.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00FK/MNR/2023/0062

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT] [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £165 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 6 July 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 August 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 LTA

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Not applicable

9. Description of premises Two storey semi-detached house comprising living room, breakfast kitchen, WC, two double bedrooms and family bathroom. Garden to rear + driveway.

[NAME] of Decision 6 July 2023

Page 1 of 5

Case Reference : BIR/00FK/MNR/2023/0062

Property : 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord : [APPELLANT].

Tenant : [APPELLANT] of Application : An Application for a Determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME]

Kay Bentley

Date of Decision : 6 July 2023

_____________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF REASONS _____________________________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Page 2 of 5

BACKGROUND

1. By way of a notice dated 28 February 2023, Futures Homescape (“the Landlord”), sought to increase the rental in respect of 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the Property”) to £165.85 per week under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) with effect from 3 April 2023.

2. The tenancy commenced on 1 August 2022 and the rent payable at the time of the notice was £155 per week.

3. By an application dated 19 April 2023, [APPELLANT] (“the Tenant”) referred the Notice of increase of rent served by the Landlord to the Tribunal.

4. The Tribunal issued its Directions dated 16 May 2023 and listed the case on 6 July 2023 carrying out an internal inspection on the same day. Neither party requested a hearing, the matter proceeding by written documents only.

5. Apart from both parties completing the standard Reply Form, no further written submissions were received from either side.

6. After consideration of the available evidence and the applicable law, the Tribunal determined a rental of £165 per week with effect from 6 July 2023, the latter date being due to hardship as the Tenant is on Universal Credit.

7. Upon receipt of the decision the Tenant requested the Tribunal provide reasons. These written reasons should therefore be read in conjunction with the Decision of the Tribunal dated 6 July 2023.

THE PROPERTY

8. The Property is located approx. 3 miles north west of Derby city centre off [ADDRESS] in Quarndon on a relatively new housing estate.

9. The accommodation briefly comprises a modern semi-detached 2-storey house comprising a hall, living room, breakfast/ kitchen, ground floor WC and on the first floor two bedrooms (both double) and a family bathroom. The Property is centrally heated and has double-glazed windows. There is driveway parking for two cars to the side of the property and a rear garden with side access.

10. The Tenant has supplied the carpets and curtains as well as the white goods. In addition, the Tenant has fitted laminate flooring in the living room as well as various light fittings. No other improvements have been carried out to the Property by either the Landlord or Tenant since it was first let.

Page 3 of 5

11. On its inspection the Tribunal found the Property to be in generally good condition reflecting its recent construction although noted that there is an issue concerning the rear kitchen door not closing properly. The Tenant also pointed out that the rear garden tends to flood when it is raining and that some drainage and guttering was missing. The Tenant also referred to some ventilation issues which has previously led to some mould and staining occurring in some rooms and in particular the kitchen and bathroom.

EVIDENCE

12. The Tribunal received no written representations from either party except in connection with the submitted Reply Forms and the information contained therein.

13. Neither the Landlord or Tenant made any further representations.

THE LAW

14. Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 states:

'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy -

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the

tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the

same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; ...'

'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting

tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant

improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out

was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the

[NAME] ...

Page 4 of 5

15. The jurisdiction of the Rent Assessment Committee was transferred to the First- tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) from 1st July 2013.

16. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal must determine the rent at which it considers that the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy.

17. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), must ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant’s improvements as defined in section 14(2) 0f the Act.

VALUATION

18. In reaching its determination, the Tribunal has had regard to the evidence and submissions of the parties, the relevant law and their own knowledge and experience as an expert Tribunal but not any special or secret knowledge.

19. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.

20. The Tribunal, as an expert Tribunal, used its own general knowledge of market rental levels in the area and from its own research into rental values for similar types of property from the surrounding areas. The Tribunal also had regard to the location, accommodation, and condition/ disrepair of the Property in relation to the evidence it considered.

21. The Tribunal considered the Tenants improvements and made an adjustment to the rent for the additions made by the Tenant. Taking all factors into consideration, the Tribunal was satisfied and concluded that the likely market rental would be £165 per week. The Tenant advised she is on Universal Credit and the Tribunal decided to have regard to this by determining the rent shall not increase until 6 July 2023 and not the date in the notice served by the Landlord.

22. The rent determined by the Tribunal for the purposes of Section 14 was, therefore, £165 per week with effect from 6 July 2023.

RIGHT OF APPEAL

23. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law only. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure

Page 5 of 5

(First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

[NAME] (Hons) FRICS

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is assessed based on the open market value of similar properties in the locality.
  • The property's condition and amenities are taken into account during the rent assessment.
  • The First-tier Tribunal determines the fair rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant's entitlement to a reasonable rent level reflecting their ability to pay is recognized.
  • Market comparables are used to establish a fair rent for the property.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No significant factors listed against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a weekly rent of £165 for a semi-detached house in Derby.

Who was involved?

The landlord and the tenant were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and the tenant's financial hardship.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the financial hardship of the tenant.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider their financial situation and the condition of the property when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The condition of the property and the tenant's financial situation were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.