VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £725 per month for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and local market rates.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent under an assured periodic tenancy, as determined by the First-tier Tribunal.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancyproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This applies specifically to periodic tenancies where the periods match those of the original tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £725 per month for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and market rates.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0023

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 269 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] 946 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £725 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 March 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 July 2019

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A

9. Description of premises Mid-terrace two storey house comprising living room, kitchen, downstairs WC, WHB + shower cubicle with 3 bedrooms on first floor (2 DB + 1 S) + small WC + WHB.

[NAME] of Decision 3 May 2023

Page 1 of 4

Case Reference : BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0023

Property : 269 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord : [APPELLANT]

Tenant : [APPELLANT] of Application : An Application for a Determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] of Decision : 3 May 2023

_____________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF REASONS _____________________________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Page 2 of 4

BACKGROUND

1. By way of a notice dated 1 February 2023, [RESPONDENT] (“the Landlord”), sought to increase the rental in respect of 269 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the Property”) to £850 per month under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) with effect from 1 March 2023.

2. The tenancy commenced on 1 July 2019 and the rent payable at the time of the notice was £610 per month.

3. By an application dated 7 February 2023, Mr [APPELLANT] (“the Tenant”) referred the Notice of increase of rent served by the Landlord to the Tribunal.

4. The Tribunal issued its Directions dated 20 February 2023 and listed the case on 3 May 2023 carrying out an internal inspection. The parties did not request a hearing.

5. No further written submissions were received from either party.

6. After consideration of the available evidence and the applicable law, the Tribunal determined a rental of £725 per month with effect from 1 March 2023.

7. Upon receipt of the decision the Landlord requested the Tribunal provide reasons. These written reasons should therefore be read in conjunction with the Decision of the Tribunal dated 3 May 2023.

THE PROPERTY

8. The Property is located to the east of Birmingham city centre in Small Heath.

9. The accommodation briefly comprises a mid-terrace 2-storey house comprising a living room, kitchen, ground floor WC with shower cubicle and on the first floor three bedrooms (two double and one single) and a small WC. The Property is centrally heated and has double-glazed windows. There is off-street parking for a vehicle to the front of the property and to the rear a garden area.

10. The Landlord has supplied the carpets and curtains as well as all the white goods. No other improvements have been carried out to the Property by either the Landlord or Tenant since it was first let.

11. The Tribunal found on its inspection that the Property’s general condition was below the standard expected of a property to let in this location noting several areas of disrepair. The Tribunal was also made aware by the Tenant of several areas of damp and mould occurring throughout the property.

Page 3 of 4

EVIDENCE

12. The Tribunal received no written representations from either party except in connection with the submitted Reply Forms and the information contained therein; the Landlord enclosing a print-out from an on-line property website detailing average asking prices and average monthly rents for 3-bedroom houses in the Birmingham area.

13. Neither the Landlord or Tenant made any further representations.

THE LAW

14. Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 states:

'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy -

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the

tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the

same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; ...'

'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME]; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a [NAME]

improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out

was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the

[NAME] ...

15. The jurisdiction of the Rent Assessment Committee was transferred to the First- tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) from 1st July 2013.

16. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal must determine the rent at which it considers that the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

Page 4 of 4

17. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), must ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any [NAME]’s improvements as defined in section 14(2) 0f the Act.

VALUATION

18. In reaching its determination, the Tribunal has had regard to the evidence and submissions of the parties, the [NAME] law and their own knowledge and experience as an expert Tribunal but not any special or secret knowledge.

19. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.

20. The Tribunal, as an expert Tribunal, used its own general knowledge of market rental levels in the area and from its own research into rental values for similar types of property from the surrounding areas. The Tribunal also had particular regard to the location, extent of the accommodation, and condition/ disrepair of the Property in relation to the evidence it considered.

21. There were no Tenants’ improvements and so no deductions were made in this respect. Taking all factors into consideration, the Tribunal was satisfied and concluded that the likely market rental would be £725 per month.

22. The rent determined by the Tribunal for the purposes of Section 14 was, therefore, £725 per month with effect from 1 March 2023.

RIGHT OF APPEAL

23. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law only. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

[NAME] (Hons) FRICS

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent for an assured periodic tenancy is determined based on the open market value of similar properties.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The First-tier Tribunal determines the fair rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant's ability to pay and the property's condition are considered in determining the rent.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord can increase rent based on market conditions without considering tenant improvements.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £725 per month for a property under an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a landlord and a tenant of a property in Birmingham.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local market rates, setting a fair rent of £725 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the reasonable market rent for similar properties.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than the landlord proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can refer a rent increase to the Tribunal if they believe the proposed rent is unfair.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the property's condition report and online rental data.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.