First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Student Accommodation in Cambridge
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided that the rent for a student accommodation in Cambridge should be £500 per month, considering the current market rate and inclusive bills.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the current market rate for similar properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a rent level that a willing landlord might reasonably expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the terms of the existing tenancy, excluding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for a student accommodation in Cambridge.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined that the rent for a student accommodation in Cambridge should be £500 per calendar month, reflecting current market rates and inclusive bills.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CAM/12UB/MNR/2023/0185 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] (Tenant) Representative : None Respondent : [redacted] (Landlords) Representative : [NAME] (Agent)) Type of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 19 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 19 February 2024
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application (undated) in December 2023 from the tenant of the Property, regarding a notice of increase of rent, served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988.
2 The notice, dated 15 November 2023, proposed a new rent of £500 per calendar month with effect from and including 18 December 2023. The passing rent was stated in the notice, as £400 per calendar month. It
2 was unclear when this had been set but, the initial rent from 18 April 2016 was £325 pcm.
3 The tenancy is an assured shorthold periodic monthly tenancy. A copy of the tenancy and of the landlord’s Notice were provided.
Inspection
4 The Tribunal did not inspect the Property internally but viewed the exterior from [ADDRESS] images of the Property from the public road (data capture @ September 2020). The house faces directly onto the pavement to a quiet established, residential street near to the City centre. There is a small rear garden but none to the front.
5 The Property is a rear first floor small double bedroom in a traditional 2 level late C19th terraced house. The Property is let out as 1 of 4 individual bedrooms with communal kitchen, living room, bathroom/WC, rear garden and internal circulation space. The larger house of which the property forms a small part is one of many small traditional late C19th terraced houses c.80m2 gross internal floor area from the information supplied, located in the street and surrounding roads. The house is of faced brick elevations. There is a double pitched main roof and likely a single pitched rear roof to the two storey back addition. Windows and front door to the shared area appear to be of the older style plastic frames with double glazed units. The front exterior appears in fair to good condition.
6 In addition to exclusive use of the Property, the tenant has shared use of a ground floor communal kitchen for cooking and laundry. The kitchen has white goods including cooker and hob and washing machine. The rent includes landlord provision of hot and cold water and waste, gas fired central heating, electricity, gas, council tax, broadband internet.
Tenant’s Representations
7 Directions, dated 15 December 2023, for the progression of the case, were issued by Legal [NAME]. A hearing was not requested. The standard Reply Form was sent to parties both of which completed and returned them.
8 The tenant made brief representations. The tenant referred to “…successful rent of an entire house nearby of exactly the same description as this one for £1750. If you divide this by 4 rooms this by 4 rooms this is £437.50. My room 3 is average, so no weight adjustment is necessary.”
9 Continuing: “[NAME] report Average Student Rent in Cambridge is now £450. Email from SAB (agent) 17/11/23 stating Landlord wishes to Recoup costs on Energy Bills. So far as I am aware you are not supposed to use a Section 13 to do this as it is only
3 to ensure rent is at or in-line the current market rate. Also, Energy bills were capped £2500 and have since going down and so has inflation.” The tenant made reference to rent arrears reminders and a court ruling on same in passing.
10 Lastly the tenant referred: “The Landlord has tried and failed to evict me for complaining about repairs that needed to be done to the property.” Apparently work required under a Council improvement Notice to “…the roof had still not been done.” No copy was provided.
11 The tenant stated that they had erected a shower curtain and rail and replaced the toilet seat.
Landlord’s Representations
12 The landlord had contacted the tenant by email of 17 November 2023. They stated that: “In December 2022, the average rent in Cambridge had increased by around 12% compared to December 2021 and currently the year-on-year increase for this region for the latest quarter is 10% so taking £400 + 12% = £448 + 10%= £492.80.”
13 The email also referred: “The landlord has also considered the inclusive bills and the energy price increase by over 50% in April 2022 followed by another increase of over 25% in October 2022 (this has subsequently reduced in the last few months by approximately 20%).
14 The email concluded: “With these statistics accounted for, the landlord believes a higher increase could be justified but equally understands some degree of consideration needs to be given to tenants so he is more so seeking to recoup some of his losses on he energy bills rather than increasing his rental income as such.”
15 The landlord noted that the bathroom/ wc had been constructed as a “wet room” and that no shower curtain was needed. Similarly the landlord contended that a replacement toilet seat had not been required. The landlord stated that although the rear garden shed was meant for all tenants to share for storage, the tenant of the Property had taken over most of the space for his storage purposes.
16 The Tribunal carefully considered written representations received, from both parties. The Tribunal thanks both for their assistance.
Law
17 In accordance with the terms of S.14 of the Act the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which it considers the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any
4 terms of the tenancy. Thus the Property falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that it is in a reasonable internal decorative condition.
Decision
18 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in Cambridge, it determines that the Property would let on normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £500 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order, fully serviced, all bills included.
19 There were no significant tenant’s improvements or additions. There appeared to no evidence of a shortfall or deficiency of service provided or condition of the Property or shared areas. The Tribunal did not adjust this figure therefore.
20 The new rent of £500 pcm is payable from and including the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice, 18 December 2023. The landlord is not obliged to charge this rent but, may not charge more.
Chairman N [NAME] 19 February 2024
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.
Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013).
If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
5 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CAM/12UB/MNR/2023/0185
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Rm 3, 78 Argyle St. Cambridge, [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] & [NAME] ([NAME] (Agent)) Address
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 500 Per Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 December 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 April 2016
6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Landlords carpets curtains. Furniture included, bed, table, chest of drawers. Common areas, white goods to shared kitchen, living room armchair and sofa
9. Description of premises First floor rear small double bedroom in typical late C19th mid terraced house. Sharing with 3 others, communal living room, kitchen, bathroom, 4 letting rooms, rear garden, shed. On a quiet side road near City Centre. Brick walls, tiled double pitched and mono pitched rear roofs on 2 levels. No off and limited permit parking. Landlord’s full GFCH and DG windows. Services included: gas electric water internet council tax, Note: The landlord is not obliged to charge this market rent but, may not charge more.
6 [NAME] [NAME] of Decision 19 February 2024
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Bracknell Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Suburban Oxford Propert…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Rent Increase
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £800 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Deficient Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Challenge Against Invalid Rent Increase Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent Based on Market Conditions
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the current market rate for similar properties.
- The rent must be adjusted based on the property's condition.
- Landlord failings can result in a lower rent adjustment.
- Ongoing maintenance issues affect the rent level.
- The landlord must provide proper notice for a rent increase according to the Housing Act 1988.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for a student accommodation in Cambridge was set at £500 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and landlords were involved in the dispute over rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market rate for similar accommodations in Cambridge.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the current market rate for similar accommodations.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the current market rate when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included market rent levels and inclusive bills.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
