VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

FTT Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £990.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's market value and condition, as well as the terms of the tenancy, to make their decision.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the property's market value while considering its condition and the terms of the tenancy.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancymarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the property's market value and condition, as well as the terms of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The FTT set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the property's condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a new rent of £990.00 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's market value and condition, as well as the terms of the tenancy.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AH/MNR/2024/0502

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 117 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge S [NAME] [NAME]

[RESPONDENT] 104 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ £990.00 Per c/month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21 August 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/ not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 September 2005

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

9. Description of premises Living room, dining room, kitchen, bathroom/w/c, two bedrooms.

MR22 [NAME] of Decision 15 January 2025

1

Case reference : LON/00AH/MNR/2024/0502 Property : 117 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Landlord : [COMPANY] Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] of [NAME] : Market rent determination in accordance with section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Judge S [NAME] [NAME] of decision : 15 January 2025 Decision of the Tribunal The FTT determines the rent to be £990.00 per calendar month, with effect from 21 August 2024. Background 1. On 27 July 2024 the Tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal (“FTT”) referring a notice proposing a new rent under his assured periodic tenancy of the Property.

2. The notice, which was served under section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) and was dated 26 June 2024, proposed a rent of £1,000.00 per calendar month with effect from 21 August 2024.

3. Neither party sent written representations to the FTT regarding the [NAME], and neither party requested an oral hearing.

4. The tenancy commenced on 28 September 2005. The Tenant remains in occupation as a statutory periodic tenant. The current rent payable is £940.00 per calendar month. Inspection 5. Neither party having requested an inspection, the FTT did not inspect the Property. The Law 6. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Act, the FTT is required to FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

determine the rent at which it considers the Property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy on the same terms as the actual tenancy ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. The FTT is also required to take into account (a) the condition of the Property, save to the extent that any disrepair is due to the Tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy and (b) the terms of the tenancy. Valuation 7. The starting point is to determine the rent which the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market in the condition considered usual for a modern letting (“the initial valuation”).

8. There was no specific comparable rental evidence from the Tenant. The Landlord’s agent commented that the rent applied for was below market level, but provided no comparable evidence. When calculating the initial valuation, the FTT decided to rely upon its own knowledge and experience.

9. A property with similar size and location with small bedrooms, no off street parking but refurbished and in good tenantable condition would have a market rent of £1,650.00 per calendar month.

10. We deduct 40% to allow for the difference in the tenancy, including the provision of carpets, curtains and white goods, a dated kitchen, a replacement bathroom without adequate heating (provided by the Tenant), and the items of disrepair reported by the Tenant.

11. The Landlord's agent indicated in their late submissions that they had carried out removal of asbestos from the bathroom and had replaced the bathroom accordingly. The Tenant stated that the new bathroom still had defects and remained inadequately heated, and that he bought a bathroom heater. Also, there was disrepair to the kitchen installed approx 40 years ago.

11. This results in a market rent of £990.00, determined by the FTT for the purposes of section 14 of the Act. The rent is to take effect from 21 August 2024, being the date that the new rent was to take effect pursuant to the Landlord’s notice. Chairman: [NAME]: 15 January 2024

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form- rp-pta-[NAME]-for-permission-toappeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands- chamber.

3

The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

1

Case reference : LON/00AH/MNR/2024/0502 Property : 117 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Landlord : [COMPANY] Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] of [NAME] : Market rent determination in accordance with section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Judge S [NAME] [NAME] of decision : 15 January 2025 Decision corrected in red under rule 50 : 07 February 2025 Decision of the Tribunal The FTT determines the rent to be £990.00 per calendar month, with effect from 21 August 2024. Background 1. On 27 July 2024 the Tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal (“FTT”) referring a notice proposing a new rent under his assured periodic tenancy of the Property.

3. Both parties sent written representations to the FTT regarding the [NAME], and neither party requested an oral hearing.

4. The tenancy commenced on 28 September 2005. The Tenant remains in occupation as a statutory periodic tenant. The current rent payable is £940.00 per calendar month. Inspection 5. Neither party having requested an inspection, the FTT did not inspect the Property. FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

The Law 6. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Act, the FTT is required to determine the rent at which it considers the Property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy on the same terms as the actual tenancy ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. The FTT is also required to take into account (a) the condition of the Property, save to the extent that any disrepair is due to the Tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy and (b) the terms of the tenancy. Valuation 7. The starting point is to determine the rent which the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market in the condition considered usual for a modern letting (“the initial valuation”).

10. We deduct 40% to allow for the difference in the tenancy, including the provision of carpets, curtains and white goods, a dated kitchen, a replacement bathroom without adequate heating (provided by the Tenant), and the tenant’s improvements and disrepair reported by the Tenant and the Tenant’s decoration obligations.

11. This results in a market rent of £990.00, determined by the FTT for the purposes of section 14 of the Act. The rent is to take effect from 21 August 2024, being the date that the new rent was to take effect pursuant to the Landlord’s notice. Chairman: [NAME]: 15 January 2025 07 February 2025

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the

3

Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form- rp-pta-[NAME]-for-permission-toappeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands- chamber.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the market rent by considering its own knowledge and experience.
  • The tribunal deducted 40% from the market rent due to the tenancy differences, including provided items and the property's condition.
  • The tenant's provision of a bathroom heater was considered because the replacement bathroom lacked adequate heating.
  • The dated kitchen, approximately 40 years old, was a factor in determining the market rent.
  • The tenant's reported disrepair and decoration obligations were considered in the rent determination.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's agent's comment that the rent was below market level was not accepted without comparable evidence.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £990.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's market value and condition, as well as the terms of the tenancy.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its market value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the market value and condition of their property when negotiating rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

No specific comparable rental evidence was provided, but the tribunal relied on its own knowledge and experience.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a party can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.