First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Market Comparables
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the market value of similar properties. The rent was set at £1950 per month, effective from December 11, 2023.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent increase that reflects the open market value of their accommodation.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the periods of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy, excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market comparables, setting the rent at £1950 per month effective from December 11, 2023.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BG/MNR/2023/0463
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 46 City Tower, 3 Mill Harbour, London, [POSTCODE]
Judge Shepherd Sarah Phillips MRICS
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1950.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 11 December 2023
*3. The amount included for services is
not applicable 0.00 Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 11th May 2019
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per s.11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A
9. Description of premises 1 bedroom flat with lounge/kitchen and bathroom/WC
Chairman Judge Shepherd Date of Decision 6th February 2024
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/OOBG/MNR/2023/0463
Property : 46 City Tower, 3 Mill Harbour, London [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] : N/A
Respondent: [redacted] : N/A
Type of Application : Rent appeal pursuant to s.14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members :
Judge Shepherd Sarah Phillips MRICS
Date of Determination : 6th February 2024
Determination
The property 1. The property is a one bedroom flat on the third floor of a block with lounge/kitchen and bathroom/toilet. The law 2. Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 sets out how rent should be increased by a landlord of an assured periodic tenant. For the purpose of securing an increase
2
in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice.
3. Section 14 deals with determination of rent by the Tribunal when there has been a reference. The Tribunal determine the rent at which, subject to qualifications they consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
4. The qualifications are that the Tribunal will disregard (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement—(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying
3
out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwellinghouse attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
Determination 5. The comparators in the vicinity suggest that the average rental for a flat like the present one is between £2050 and £2300 pcm. Accordingly the landlord’s proposed rent increase to £1950 is acceptable.
Judge Shepherd 6th February 2024
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL Appealing against the tribunal’s decisions
1. A written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional tribunal office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional tribunal office within 28 days after the date this decision is sent to the parties.
3. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The application for permission to appeal must state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. All applications for permission to appeal will be considered on the papers 5. Any application to stay the effect of the decision must be made at the same time as the application for permission to appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines New Rent for Statutory Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Statutory Periodic Tena…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,400 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decis…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Disrepair
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined the rent based on what the dwelling-house might reasonably be expected to be let for in the open market.
- The tribunal considered comparable properties in the area to assess the appropriate rent.
- The landlord's proposed rent increase to £1950 was deemed acceptable by the tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1950 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on market comparables, ensuring the rent reflects the open market value.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of rents in the local market.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord, allowing the proposed rent increase.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider market comparables when negotiating rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Market comparables data was crucial in determining the appropriate rent.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made within 28 days to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
