VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Lighting Works Without Consultation

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, a landlord successfully requested permission to install lighting in a communal hallway without consulting the tenants beforehand because the work was deemed urgent and necessary for safety reasons.

⚖️ Legal holding

An applicant landlord is entitled to dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent works if there is no objection and no prejudice.

Topics

dispensationstatutory consultationurgent works

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

This section allows a tribunal to grant dispensation to a landlord to bypass consultation requirements for certain works or long-term agreements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so. It defines 'qualifying works' as works on a building or premises and 'qualifying long term agreement' as an agreement lasting over twelve months. The 'consultation requirements' refer to rules set by the Secretary of State that require landlords to consult tenants about proposed works or agreements.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal granted dispensation for urgent lighting works in a communal hallway without prior consultation.

📜 Headnote Official document

The tribunal granted dispensation to the landlord for the installation of lighting and associated works in the communal hallway of a multi-flat property, citing the urgent nature of the works and the absence of objections or prejudice.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BJ/LDC/2023/0142 Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [COMPANY] Respondents : [redacted] (2) [NAME] (3) [NAME] : N/A

Type of application : Application for dispensation to consult – section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal : Judge Tagliavini Date of decision : 9 August 2023

DECISION

___________________________________________________________________________

2

The tribunal’s summary decision

(1.) The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of the installation of lighting and associated works in the communal hallway at 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE].

_________________________________________________________

The application

1. This is an application made pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) seeking dispensation for the consultation requirements in respect of the installation of lighting and associated works in the hallway of 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (‘the premises’).

Background

2. The subject premises comprises an Edwardian semi-detached house converted into three self-contained flats over three floors.

3. The applicant landlord has applied for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of works to install lighting in the communal hallway, which includes the installation of a distribution board, 3- phase supply and to obtain a Meter point Administration Number (MPAN) from the UK Power Networks. The works are said to be urgent as there is an absence of lighting in the communal hallway and this represents a health and safety hazard.

4. The tribunal was satisfied the leaseholders had been served with notice of the application and provided with a copy of the tribunal’s Directions dated 20 June 2023. However, no response/objections have been received by the tribunal from the respondent leaseholders.

The hearing

5. The application was determined by the tribunal on the papers as no party requested an oral hearing. In making its decision the tribunal took into account the information provided by the applicant by way of a bundle comprising 50 electronic pages. No documentation was received from the respondents.

3

The tribunal’s decision and reasons

6. The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of the installation of lighting and associated works in the communal hallway at the subject premises.

7. The tribunal has had regard to the urgent nature of the works as evidenced by the applicant’s Statement of Case and supporting documents and the absence of any objection by the respondents to either the works that have been carried out or to this application. The tribunal has also considered the absence of prejudice caused by the lack of consultation pursuant to section 20 of the 2985 Act in respect of the works for which the applicant seeks dispensation. Therefore, in the circumstances the tribunal considers it reasonable and proportionate to grant the application sought; [COMPANY] v Benson and others [2013] UKSC 14.

Name: Judge Tagliavini

Date: 9 August 2023

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

4

If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The works were urgent because there was no lighting in the communal hallway, posing a health and safety risk.
  • The leaseholders did not object to the works or the application for dispensation.
  • The tribunal found no evidence that the lack of consultation caused any harm to the leaseholders.
  • The tribunal was satisfied that the leaseholders had been properly informed about the application.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal granted dispensation for the landlord to carry out urgent lighting works in the communal hallway without consulting the leaseholders.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about whether the landlord needed to consult the leaseholders before installing lighting and associated works in the communal hallway of a multi-flat building.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant dispensation because the works were deemed urgent and there was no evidence of prejudice to the leaseholders.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The court applied s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the urgency of the works and the absence of any objections from the leaseholders.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek dispensation from consultation requirements if their works are urgent and there is no prejudice to leaseholders.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the exact evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.