VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Works Without Consultation

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal granted permission to a landlord to carry out necessary repairs without consulting the tenants because the work was urgent and there were no objections raised.

⚖️ Legal holding

The tribunal granted dispensation under the Landlord and Tenant Act when the works were urgent and there were no objections from the respondents.

Topics

dispensationstatutory consultation requirementswater ingress

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

This section allows an appropriate tribunal to grant a determination to waive consultation requirements related to qualifying works or agreements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so. Qualifying works refer to work done on a building or premises, and qualifying long-term agreements are those lasting over twelve months. The consultation requirements involve providing details of proposed works or agreements to tenants, obtaining estimates, inviting tenant suggestions for estimates, considering tenant observations, and giving reasons for certain actions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal granted dispensation under the Landlord and Tenant Act for additional works due to the urgent need and lack of objections.

📜 Headnote Official document

The tribunal granted dispensation to the landlord to undertake additional works at a property to address water ingress and damp issues, bypassing the statutory consultation requirements due to the urgent nature of the works and the absence of objections from the tenants.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AF/LDC/2022/0126 Property : 17 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [NAME] – [COUNSEL] [NAME] Respondents : [redacted] Ms [COUNSEL] and Ms [COUNSEL] : N/A

Type of application : Application for dispensation to consult – section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal : Judge Tagliavini Date of decision : 22 August 2023

DECISION

___________________________________________________________________________

2

The tribunal’s summary decision

(1.) The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of additional [NAME] to 17 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] in the estimated sum of £6060 (including VAT) required to remedy water ingress and damp.

_________________________________________________________

The application

1. This is an application made pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) seeking dispensation for the consultation requirements in respect of the [NAME] required at 17 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE].

Background

2. The subject premises comprises a Victorian solid brick house converted into three self-contained flats.

3. The Applicant has applied for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect further [NAME] identified by the [NAME] and in a report by [NAME] dated 15/03/2023. The further [NAME] were estimated by [NAME] to cost in the region of £6060.00 (including VAT) in an estimate dated 30/03/2023. The additional [NAME] were said to be necessary in order to remedy the issue with water ingress and damp.

4. The tribunal was satisfied the leaseholders had been informed of this application and as stated in an email from the applicant to the tribunal dated 8 August 2023. No response/objections have been received by the tribunal from the respondents.

The hearing

5. The application was determined by the tribunal on the papers as no party requested an oral hearing. In making its decision the tribunal took into account the information provided by the applicant by way of a bundle comprising 72 electronic pages which included a witness statement from [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] Administrator dated 8 August 2023, who confirmed no objections had been received from any of the respondent to the [NAME] either to the proposed [NAME] or to the application. No documentation was received from the respondents by the tribunal but emails to the applicant from the [NAME] asking for the [NAME] to go ahead were included in the applicant’s bundle.

3

The tribunal’s decision and reasons

6. The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of the additional [NAME] to remedy the water ingress and damp at the subject premises.

7. The tribunal has had regard to the urgent nature of the [NAME] as evidenced by the reports included in the documents provided to the tribunal and the absence of any objection by the respondents to the [NAME] required. or to this application. The tribunal has also considered the absence of prejudice caused by the lack of consultation pursuant to section 20 of the 2985 Act in respect of the [NAME] for which the applicant seeks dispensation. Therefore, in the circumstances the tribunal considers it reasonable and proportionate to grant the application sought; [COMPANY] v Benson and others [2013] UKSC 14.

Name: Judge Tagliavini

Date: 22 August 2023

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

4

If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The works are deemed urgent and necessary.
  • There are no objections raised by the tenants.
  • The landlord seeks dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
  • The rent increase notice complies with statutory time requirements.
  • The rent determination is based on the property's condition and market comparables.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The claimant fails to provide proper disclosure, witness statements, and hearing bundles.
  • The tenant maintains their right to the current rent level until the tenancy ends if the landlord withdraws the rent increase application.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant dispensation to the landlord to carry out necessary works without consulting the tenants.

Who was involved?

The landlord and the tenants were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant dispensation because the works were urgent and there were no objections from the tenants.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The urgency of the works and the lack of objections from the tenants were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek dispensation if their works are urgent and there are no objections from the tenants.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Reports from a professional company and estimates for the works were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.