Landlord ordered to provide tenant information to association
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a landlord must provide information about tenants to a a person tenants' association when requested, according to the 2018 Regulations.
⚖️ Legal holding
The landlord must comply with the request for information about tenants under the Tenants' Associations Regulations.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal ordered the landlord to fulfill its duties under the Tenants' Associations Regulations, providing information about tenants to the association.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal ordered the landlord to provide information about tenants to a relevant tenants' association, finding the landlord failed to perform its duties under the 2018 Regulations.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
Case reference
: MAN/00CX/HTB/2023/0001 Name and Address of Association
: [COMPANY], 501 VM1 [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted] Respondent
: [redacted]
: Part 3, Regulation 11 of the Tenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018
Tribunal members
: Judge J.M.[NAME] of Decision
:
13 December 2023
_______________________________________________
Decision and Orders ___________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Decision and Orders
The Tribunal finds that the Respondent has failed, without a reasonable excuse, to perform its duties under regulations 8,9, and 10 of the Regulations. Consequently, and pursuant to the powers conferred on it by regulation 11, it now orders the Respondent to remedy the situation by performing those duties and as more particularly set out in the penultimate paragraph of these reasons. The Tribunal also orders the Applicant to send to the Respondent, or its managing agents on its behalf, within 7 days of receipt of this decision, an up-to-date schedule listing the [NAME] who are already members of the Association.
Preliminary and background
1. On 22 February 2023, the Tribunal received an application (“the Application”) under Part 3, Regulation 11 of the Tenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information (England) Regulations 2018 (“the Regulations”) for an order requiring the landlord to perform a duty under regulation 8, 9 or 10.
2. The Tribunal issued directions on 29 August 2023, setting out a timetable for statements, responses and [NAME] documents to be submitted and confirming that it considered it appropriate for the matter to be determined by a paper determination, unless either party requested an oral hearing. Neither has done so.
3. The Tribunal convened on 11 December 2023 to consider and determine the Application.
Facts and chronology
4. None of the following matters, which are evident from the papers, have been disputed.
On 3 February 2023 The Applicant, who is the secretary of the Association, sent an email to [RESPONDENT] at [RESPONDENT] (“[NAME]”) who are the Respondent’s managing agents. Attached to the email was a formal request notice (“the Request Notice”) under regulation 7 of the Regulations requiring the Respondent to provide information about tenants who are not members of the Association. On 10 February 2023 The Applicant sent a letter to [NAME] referring to the email sent on 3 February stating “we have not received a response…” and enclosing paper copies of the email, the Request Notice, the Association’s constitution, summaries of the minutes of a meeting on 30 November 2022 and duties of a managing agent, and requesting a formal response by 17 February 2023.
On 14 February 2023 at 14.55 Ms [NAME] emailed a response stating “….Having reviewed the application with the Landlord we are sorry to advise that the number of paid up members verified by signatures must b(e) 51% or more of the leaseholders at [NAME]. Until such time as the number of authenticated members reaches this level the Landlord is not able to consider this further.” at 16.51 the Applicant replied “….Please note we are not asking for recognition. A request is being made for “the landlord to provide information about tenants who are not members of the association” as set out in this piece of legislation…. Recognition is not a requirement to make this request. Now that you have acknowledged receipt of this request, if we do not receive a response …. in the next 24-hours, we will assume that the request has been denied…” at 17.52 Ms [NAME] responded with a further email stating “Thank you for clarifying. I am able to confirm that this information can be provided to the secretary of the [COMPANY]. This means that the association needs to be recognised by the landlord before this happens. We cannot provide private tenant information to a non-recognised [COMPANY]…” at 18.57 The Applicant replied “… The term “recognised” is certainly not mentioned in part 3 of the 2018 regulations” and then after cross-referencing the term “[COMPANY]” and its definition in section 29(A)(8) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 concluded that “therefore this is not the same as “recognised [COMPANY]”. In the light of the above, can you confirm that you will abide by the legislation?” On 17 February 2023 Ms [NAME] replied “the wording you need to look at is “[NAME]” which means recognized… ” On 22 February 2023 The Applicant submitted the Application to the Tribunal.
The parties’ submissions
5. The Applicant has provided a bundle of documents including copies of a sample lease, the emails and letter referred to above, proof of posting and delivery of the letter, the Request Notice, the Association’s constitution, summaries of minutes of meetings in November 2022, January, February, May and July 2023, an updated members list, her statement of case and a legal opinion from LEASE.
6. In her statement of case, dated 18 September 2023 she said “The [COMPANY] was legitimately formed on 30th November 2022 by the current officers as a [COMPANY] under Section 29A(8) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. This association was established based on the ‘ARMA Model Rules/Constitution for Residents Associations’ and upholds a constitution based on those rules ….The membership has grown organically following the formation of the association and currently stands at 126 apartments (28% of the entire complex … 80 of which are fully paid and 46 of which are currently going
through the payment process )…..I had previously contacted the Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE) for final clarification on (the point that a “[NAME]” association is not the same as a “recognised” association and that a [COMPANY] does not need to be “recognised” for the request notice to be fulfilled)…. Unfortunately, due to their substantial workload, we did not receive a response until 13th April 2023. The LEASE legal advisor stated that …. we can exercise our right to request information about other tenants without the need for the tenant’s association to be recognised first……Prior to me issuing our formal Request Notice, the treasurer of the [COMPANY] …had spoken with a fellow leaseholder … and [NAME] (Divisional Director, Rendall & Rittner with two decades of experience at the Property Management & Director levels) via telephone on 23 January 2023 and asked for a letter to be circulated to all leaseholders to make them aware of the presence of the association. During that conversation Mr [NAME] incorrectly stated that they can send out a letter to leaseholders, but “only once the association is recognised”. He then followed this statement with, it must be said considerable confidence and certainty, that he was sorry but that “it is what the law says”…..We struggle to comprehend how such an experienced member of senior staff of the managing agent .. could not be cognisant of their duties as specified in the …Regulations.
7. Mr [NAME], in response, by way an email to the Tribunal on 13 October 2023 stated “…. we advise you that [NAME] wishes not to comply with the request relating to the above claim. [NAME] strongly believes that the claimant does not want to form a recognised [COMPANY]. They are in fact using the provision within the Act as a recruitment sergeant for the December 2021 FTT Case, something they do not wish to support. [NAME] has also asked me to add that the applicants have been invited to several meetings but they have, to date, not replied”
The Law
8. The Regulations came into force on 1 November 2018 to make it easier for tenants’ associations (“TAs”) to become legally recognized, and to obtain information from landlords about other tenants who have a legal right to join the [NAME]. The explanatory memorandum issued by the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government confirms that the purpose of the Regulations was to remove barriers to establishing a membership threshold for a [NAME] to be recognised.
9. Part 3 of the Regulations introduced a requirement that a landlord must disclose the contact details known to it of [NAME] in the development to the secretary of the [NAME].
10. For ease of reference the provisions contained in Part 3 have been reproduced in the schedule to this Decision.
11. In summary, the [NAME] has the power to serve a request notice on the landlord or the landlord’s managing agent to obtain known information about [NAME] who are not currently members of the [NAME]. Landlords must, within 7 days of receipt of the request notice, acknowledge receipt in writing and inform the [NAME]’s secretary that they will provide a substantive response. If the landlord does not consider the request notice to be valid, they must inform the [NAME]’s secretary in writing within 7 days that they will not provide a substantive response, giving reasons why the request notice is invalid. A landlord must, as soon as practicable, give a signed and
dated information form to each tenant in relation to whom known information has been requested. An information form informs the tenant that a [NAME] has requested known information relating to them and why it has been requested. The form identifies the [NAME] and includes the postal and email address of the [NAME]. It asks the tenant for written consent to disclose the known information, explains that it will not be disclosed without that consent and informs the tenant to direct any queries to the [NAME]. The tenant is asked to reply within 28 days of receipt either (1) confirming consent to all known information being disclosed, (2) confirming consent to a partial disclosure and stating what may be disclosed, or (3) refusing consent to any information being disclosed. A landlord must provide a substantive response within 4-months of the notice being received. The response must state either all requested known information which the landlord has the consent to disclose or that there is no such known information. It must also state the number of tenants (1) to whom the landlord sent an information form and (2) to whom known information was requested who did not give written consent for information to be disclosed. It must be accompanied by a signed and dated statement that the information contained in the substantive response is true to the best of the landlord’s knowledge and belief. Where the landlord receives consent from a tenant to disclose information after the expiry of the 4-month period, the landlord must disclose the information as soon as reasonably practicable after the consent is received together with the statement of truth from the landlord. The Regulations contain a power for the [NAME] to apply to the Tribunal for an order to compel the landlord to comply with its duties under the Regulations. If the landlord fails to comply with such an order, the Tribunal has the discretion to grant a certificate of recognition where the membership of the [NAME] is less than 50% of [NAME].
The Tribunal’s findings, reasons and conclusions
12. The Tribunal began with a general review of the papers to decide whether the case could be dealt with properly without holding an oral hearing. Rule 31 of its procedural rules allows this provided that the parties give their consent (or do not object when a paper determination is proposed).
13. Neither party has requested an oral hearing, and the Tribunal is satisfied that this matter is suitable to be determined without one. The issues are clearly identified, and the documentation provides clear and obvious evidence of its contents. It has not been challenged, and the Tribunal finds no reason to doubt the detail contained.
14. The Tribunal next considered whether the Request Notice was valid and complied with the requirements of regulation 7. There has been no assertion from the Respondent or [NAME] that it was not valid, and the Tribunal found that it was valid, compliant and duly served.
15. The Tribunal also found that the Respondent did not, as mandated under regulation 8, acknowledge the Request Notice within 7 days its receipt.
16. The Tribunal then considered the submissions made on behalf of the Respondent.
17. The emails from Ms [RESPONDENT] show, at best, an ignorance and lack of understanding of the Regulations. This is despite the Applicant having clearly set out and explained their meaning and purport.
18. The response to the Application by Mr [RESPONDENT] is clear and obvious evidence of the Respondent’s deliberate and wilful disregard for its obligations under the Regulations. The explanations given were not found to be valid, [NAME], or to constitute a reasonable excuse for ignoring what are strict mandatory requirements.
19. The notes to the Regulations make it quite clear that the definition of what is a “[COMPANY]” is to be found in 29A(8) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, which for completeness has also been set out in the schedule hereto.
20. It is abundantly clear that a “[NAME]” [NAME] is quite distinct from a “recognised” [NAME]. The defining purpose of the Regulations is to assist an aspiring “[NAME]” [NAME] to become a “recognised” [NAME].
21. The Applicant has provided ample evidence of the Association being a [NAME] [NAME], with appointed officers, a constitution, conducting meetings and having a growing membership.
22. There has been no indication that the Respondent, or [NAME] on its behalf, has made any attempt to discharge, as it should, its duties as set out in regulations 8, 9 and 10. On the contrary, it has deliberately ignored and sought to avoid such duties.
23. If the Respondent had complied with such duties in a timely fashion when it should have done, the Applicant would have received a substantive response to the Request Notice by no later than the middle of June 2023.
24. The Tribunal has had no difficulty in concluding that the Respondent, as landlord, has failed to perform its duties under regulations 8,9, and 10, and does not have a reasonable excuse for such failure.
25. The Tribunal therefore hereby Orders and requires:- (1) the Respondent to proceed forthwith, beginning on the day of receipt of this decision by it or [NAME], whichever is earlier, (“the receipt date”) to properly and completely perform all of its outstanding duties as set out in regulations 8,9, and 10 of the Regulations in relation to the Association, but with the references in regulation 10 to the 4 month period from the receipt of the Request Notice now being read as a reference to a 2 month period beginning with the receipt date. The Respondent must begin by informing the Applicant, within 7 days of the receipt date, that it will provide a substantive response to the Request Notice. (2) the Applicant to send to the Respondent, or [NAME] on its behalf, within the same 7 days of the receipt date, an up-to-date schedule listing the [NAME] who are already members of the Association.
26. The Respondent is reminded that if it fails to comply with this Order, regulation 4(5) provides that the need for the Association to represent at least 50% of the [NAME] in an application for a certificate of recognition under section 29(1)(b)(i) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 would no longer apply.
The Schedule
The [NAME]
Tenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018/1043 …. 4.— Circumstances in which a certificate is not to be given (1) The First-tier Tribunal must not give a certificate to a [COMPANY] in relation to a premises where the [COMPANY] represents fewer than 50% of the [NAME] of dwellings situated in the premises. (2) But where— (a) the [COMPANY] represents [NAME] in dwellings situated in related premises; and (b) those [NAME] contribute to the same costs by the payment of a service charge, the First-tier Tribunal must not give a certificate to the [COMPANY] in relation to the related premises if the [COMPANY] represents an aggregate of fewer than 50% of the [NAME] of dwellings situated in the related premises. (3) The First-tier Tribunal must not give a certificate to a [COMPANY] in relation to any premises if a certificate has previously been given to a [COMPANY] in relation to the premises and the certificate is in force. (4) The First-tier Tribunal must not give a certificate to a [COMPANY] if the First-tier Tribunal is not satisfied that the constitution and rules of the [COMPANY] are fair and democratic. (5) Paragraphs (1) and (3) do not apply where— (a) the landlord has failed to comply with an order made by the First-tier tribunal in relation to the [COMPANY] under regulation 11 (an order requiring the landlord to comply with regulation 8, 9 or 10); and (b) the [COMPANY] represents a substantial number of [NAME] of dwellings in the premises or, as the case may be, the related premises. (6) This regulation is without prejudice to any powers the First-tier Tribunal has, including its powers to not give a certificate. ….
6. Interpretation of Part 3 In this Part— “information form” has the meaning given in regulation 9(2) (landlord’s method of contacting [NAME]); “known information” has the meaning in regulation 7(6) (request by [COMPANY] for known information); “request notice” has the meaning given in regulation 7.
7.— Request by [COMPANY] for known information (1) The secretary of a [COMPANY] may serve a notice (a “request notice”) on the landlord of a dwelling to which the association relates which contains a request for the landlord to provide known information about [NAME] who are not members of the association. (2) A request notice must—
(a) include— (i) a schedule listing the [NAME] who are members of the [COMPANY]; (ii) the postal address of the [COMPANY]; and (iii) an email address for the [COMPANY], if it has one; and (b) be signed and dated by the secretary of the [COMPANY]. (3) Where the secretary of a [COMPANY] gives more than one request notice in respect of the same [NAME], the later notice supersedes all earlier notices. (4) The request notice must be accompanied by a statement that— (a) the known information being requested will be used only to ask the [NAME] concerned if they wish to become members of the [COMPANY]; and (b) is signed and dated by the secretary of the [COMPANY]. (5) A request notice is duly served on a landlord under this regulation if it is served on the landlord’s managing agent. (6) In this regulation— “known information”, in relation to a [NAME] (”T”), means any of the following information that is in the possession of the landlord or the landlord’s managing agent— (a) T’s name; (b) the address of the dwelling for which T pays a service charge; (c) any address to which service charge demands for T are sent; (d) T’s email address; “managing agent” means an agent appointed by the landlord to discharge any of the landlord’s obligations to the tenants represented by the [COMPANY] which relate to the management by the landlord of the tenants’ dwellings.
8.— Landlords’ duty: acknowledgement of request notice (1) A landlord who has been served with a request notice must, within 7 days beginning with the date on which the request notice was received— (a) acknowledge receipt of the request notice in writing; and (b) inform the secretary of the [COMPANY] that the landlord will provide a substantive response to the notice. (2) Where the landlord does not consider the notice received to be a valid request notice, the landlord must, within 7 days beginning with the date on which the notice was received— (a) inform the secretary of the [NAME] tenant’s association in writing that the landlord will not provide a substantive response to the notice because the landlord does not consider the notice received to be a valid request notice; and (b) give reasons as to why the landlord does not consider the notice received to be a valid request notice. (3) “Substantive response” has the meaning given in regulation 10(2).
9.— Landlords’ duty: contacting [NAME] (1) A landlord who has been served with a request notice must, as soon as practicable after the request notice was received, give an information form to each [NAME] (“T”) in relation to whom known information has been requested. (2) An “information form” is a written document which— (a) informs T that a [COMPANY] has requested that the landlord
provide known information relating to T; (b) sets out what known information has been requested in relation to T; (c) identifies the [COMPANY] that has made the request; (d) includes— (i) the postal address of the [COMPANY]; and (ii) an email address for the [COMPANY], if it has one; (e) asks T for written consent to disclose the known information to the [COMPANY]; (f) informs T that the known information will not be disclosed without that consent; (g) informs T that the [NAME] tenant’s association has stated in its request that the known information will be used only to ask T if T wishes to become a member of the [COMPANY]; (h) informs T that any queries relating to the [COMPANY] should be directed to the [COMPANY]; (i) asks T to reply within 28 days beginning with the date of receipt of the information form— (i) confirming that [NAME] consents to all of the known information being disclosed to the [COMPANY]; (ii) confirming that [NAME] consents to some of the known information being disclosed to the [COMPANY], and stating the known information that may be disclosed; or (iii) confirming that [NAME] does not consent to any of the known information being disclosed to the [COMPANY]; (j) gives a postal address and, if the landlord has one, an email address, which can be used to reply to the landlord; and (k) is signed and dated by the landlord.
10.— Landlords’ duty: substantive response to request notice (1) A landlord who has been served with a request notice which does not fall within regulation 8(2) must provide a substantive response to the [NAME] tenant’s association which served the notice within 4 months beginning with the date on which the notice was received (“the 4 month period”). (2) A “substantive response” is a written document which— (a) states— (i) all known information requested in the request notice which the landlord has consent to disclose; or (ii) that there is no such known information; (b) states the number of [NAME] to whom the landlord sent an information form in connection with the request notice; (c) states the number of [NAME] in relation to whom known information was requested who did not give written consent for known information to be disclosed by the landlord; and (d) is signed and dated by the landlord. (3) The substantive response must be accompanied by a statement that— (a) the information contained in the substantive response is true to the best of the landlord’s knowledge and belief; and (b) is signed and dated by the landlord. (4) Where the landlord receives consent from a [NAME] to disclose known information after the 4 month period, the landlord must disclose the known information as soon as reasonably practicable after the consent is received (“further disclosure”).
(5) Further disclosure under paragraph (4) must— (a) be in writing; and (b) be accompanied by a statement that— (i) the information comprising the further disclosure is true to the best of the landlord’s knowledge and belief; and (ii) is signed and dated by the landlord.
11.— Power of First-tier Tribunal to remedy failure by a landlord to comply (1) The secretary of a [COMPANY] may apply to the First-tier tribunal for an order requiring the landlord to perform a duty under regulation 8, 9 or 10 of these Regulations. (2) The First-tier Tribunal may make such an order where— (a) the landlord has failed to perform a duty under regulation 8, 9 or, as the case may be, 10; and (b) the landlord does not have a reasonable excuse for failing to perform the duty.
Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s. 29A Tenants’ associations: power to request information about tenants …. (8) In this section— “[COMPANY]”, in relation to a landlord, means an association of tenants of the landlord at least one of whom is a [NAME] of a dwelling in England; “[NAME]” means— (a) a person who is a [NAME] of a dwelling in England and a member of the [COMPANY], or (b) a person who is a [NAME] of a dwelling in England by virtue of being required to contribute to the same costs as a [NAME] who is a member of the [COMPANY]; “[NAME]” means a tenant who, under the terms of the lease, is required to contribute to the same costs as another tenant by the payment of a service charge.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Certificate of Recognition to Tenants' Associati…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal rules on service charge validity
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Flat-Rate Increase in Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules on Service Charge Recoverability
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Necessary Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Property Manager Extension Until 2027
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Allowed to Challenge Reasonableness of Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Administration Charges for Ground Rent Colle…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Allowed to Bypass Consultation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Extends Property Manager Order Until May 2025
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Fire Safety Works
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord failed to acknowledge the request notice within 7 days of receiving it.
- The landlord's managing agent showed ignorance and a lack of understanding of the regulations.
- The landlord deliberately ignored its obligations under the regulations.
- The landlord's explanations for not complying were not valid or a reasonable excuse.
- The tenant association provided ample evidence of being a qualifying association with appointed officers and a constitution.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord argued that the association needed to be "recognised" before information could be provided.
- The landlord argued that "qualifying tenants' association" meant "recognised".
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The landlord must provide information about tenants to a relevant tenants' association.
Who was involved?
A tenants' association and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided the landlord must comply with the request because the landlord failed to perform its duties under the 2018 Regulations.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Tenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the landlord failed to provide the necessary information to the tenants' association.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenants' association.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can request information from their landlord through a tenants' association.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Emails and letters exchanged between the tenants' association and the landlord's managing agents.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
