Lease Variations Approved for Enhanced Fire Safety
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal approved changes to leases to improve fire safety and ensure compliance with relevant statutes. The decision was made to address deficiencies in the current leases and to place obligations on the parties to comply with all statutory provisions related to the flats and the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to vary a lease to ensure compliance with fire safety regulations and statutory requirements.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, any party to a long lease of a flat can apply to the appropriate tribunal for an order to vary the lease. The application can be based on several grounds, including the failure of the lease to provide satisfactory provisions regarding the repair or maintenance of the flat, building, or related land/buildings, insurance of the building, installations necessary for reasonable accommodation, services necessary for reasonable accommodation, recovery of expenditure, computation of service charges, and other matters prescribed by regulations.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal approved variations to leases under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 to address fire safety and statutory compliance issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal approved variations to leases under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 to address fire safety and statutory compliance issues. The decision was made by Judge Dutton and Mr C Gowman MCIEH MCMI BSc at the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BH/LVT/2021/0006 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio)
P: PAPERREMOTE Property : 35 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [APPELLANT] Respondent : [redacted] [COUNSEL] (2) Representative :
Type of [NAME] : Variation of a lease under s35 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 Tribunal member(s) : Judge [NAME] C Gowman MCIEH MCMI BSc Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] by paper determination Date of decision : 8 December 2021
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote determination on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined on paper. The
documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in a bundle of 66 pages, the contents of which have been noted. DECISION
The tribunal agrees to the amendments to the leases of flats 35A and 35B [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (the flats) under the provisions of section 35(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 as set out on the schedule annexed to the applicant’s undated further submissions received at the tribunal on 5 October 2021 and as annexed hereto.
We exercise our powers under Rule 50 to correct the clerical mistake, accidental slip or omission at paragraph 14 of our Decision dated 8 December 2021. Our amendments are made in red. We have corrected our original Decision because of the difficulties with dealing with the variation raised by the HM Land Registry, in the hope that the correction will resolve the issue.
Signed: Judge Dutton Dated: 19 October 2023
BACKGROUND
1. By an [NAME] dated 1 June 2021 the applicant, [APPELLANT], through [APPELLANT] (Ms [COUNSEL], solicitor), sought to amend the two leases at the property 35 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (the Property).
2. In Preliminary Submissions it is asserted on behalf of the applicant, who is the owner of the freehold of the Property, that the two leases fail to make satisfactory provision for the matters referred to at section 35(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (the Act),
3. In particular, it is said that following the Grenfell tragedy greater emphasis has been placed on fire safety and that the leases are deficient in this regard. This is set out fully at paragraph 3 of the Preliminary Submissions where it is said that section 35(2)(c), (d) and (e) are relevant. In respect of subsections (c) and (d) the factors to be considered are to be found at section 35(3) and in particular the safety and security of the flat and its occupiers and of any common parts of the building containing the flat.
4. It is said that the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (FSO) as amended by the Fire Safety Act 2021, whilst not generally applying to domestic premises, does have relevance in this case there being two or more domestic premises in the Property, and is in relation to the structure, common parts and doors between the
flats and the common parts. The submission goes on to highlight the responsibility of the applicant in regard to the FSO and the liability that the respondents may also have.
5. There is concern as to the lack of access to the flats and the lack of responsibility on the part of the respondents and their successors to comply with the FSO and the potential difficulty in the recovery of any costs the applicant may incur in fulfilling its obligations. It is said that the variations sought would • Place obligations on the parties to comply with all statutory provisions relating to the flats, and the Property • Enable the recovery by one party from another of expenditure incurred or to be incurred in compliance • Allow the applicant to carry out inspections and or works it is required to undertake and • The recovery of any costs incurred in such work
6. When the matter first came before us for consideration on 1 September 2021 there were concerns about the numbering of the proposed variations, which did not accord to the numbering of the existing leases for the flats. In addition, having reviewed the two leases there appear to be wrongful use of ‘upper’ and ‘lower’ flat as well as some duplication of wording. We therefore adjourned the determination and wrote to the [NAME] seeking clarification on these points.
7. Such clarification came in the form of further submissions, which were undated, but received at the tribunal on or about 5 October 2021. It is following these further submissions and a revised schedule of variations that we met to consider the matter further on 8 December 2021. The further submissions corrected the numbering issue, removed some duplicity of terms and combined a clause.
8. Under the heading ‘cut and paste’ errors we were told that these had been reviewed. As to flat 35A these errors had been picked up in 2014 and a Deed of Variation entered into correcting the erroneous use of ‘upper’ and ‘lower’ flat. We have had the chance to see the Deed which is dated 23 September 2014 and made between [COMPANY] (1) And [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] (2). It would seem that these may have been the predecessors in title of the applicant and [COMPANY]. It would appear to correct these errors and includes an amended clause 1(f).
9. In fact, the lease for flat 35B does not appear to be so inflicted with the erroneous use of ‘upper’ and ‘lower’ flat definitions and requires little in the way of variation to amend these drafting errors.
FINDINGS
10. We have considered the provisions of section 35(2) and (3) of the Act. We are satisfied that the parties do have responsibility under the FSO and indeed other regulations that may impact on the use of the Property. It is unclear whether there are satisfactory fire prevention elements at the Property in the way of fire doors between the flats and common parts. In addition, it may be that some form of smoke/fire alarm system needs to be considered. The obligation in respect of such works can now be covered under the variations as can the recovery of the costs of compliance.
11.
Accordingly, we are satisfied that the provisions of section 35(2)(c), (d) and (e) apply and that the basis for such determination under section 35(3) are made out. We have also had confirmation from Dr [RESPONDENT] on behalf of [COMPANY] that the respondent does not challenge the variations sought, although this would appear to relate to variations under section 35 rather than the ‘cut and paste’ changes, remembering of course that the lease to flat 35A has already been corrected.
12. As to the ‘cut and paste’ errors we find that we can approve the variations under the terms of section 35(2)(a) to remove any uncertainty as to the repair and or maintenance of the Property.
13. We do not appear to have representations from [NAME] [NAME] nor his mortgagees [NAME], who acknowledged receipt of the [NAME], but it is unclear whether they have been advised of the proposed ‘cut and paste’ corrections.
Accordingly, we direct that they must be provided with a copy of this decision and the schedule of changes within 14 days of the date the decision is sent to the [NAME] who must confirm with us that this has been done.
14. The changes we endorse, with some amendments are shown on the attached schedule. It will be for the applicant to complete the varied leases and lodge them at the Land Registry. lodge the Tribunal’s determination and schedule of variations so the variations can be recorded at the Land Registry.
Andrew Dutton
Judge Dutton
8 December 2021
19 October 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28- day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Schedule of Variations/amendments Insertion of Clause Clause wording Insertion of Clause 2 (v) We have inserted the wording from 2(v) below, in part as the obligation to repair and maintain the Building is set out in clause 2(g). We have also changed the order of the clauses “[NAME] hereby covenants with [NAME] to comply at [NAME]’s own expense with all relevant statutes bye-laws regulations guidance and any other requirements of any competent authority requiring any alteration addition works or modification to the Building PROVIDED THAT if [NAME] shall at any time make default in the performance of any of the covenants hereinbefore contained relating to the compliance with any statute bye-law regulation guidance or any other requirement of any competent authority [NAME] may in its absolute discretion perform such services the cost thereof shall be a debt due from the payable to [NAME] on demand and forthwith recoverable by action.” ” Insertion of Clause 2 (u) “[NAME] hereby covenants with [NAME] and as separate covenant severally with [NAME] of the other flat to pay on demand to or to the order of [NAME] without any deduction all reasonable costs and expenses of whatever nature incurred or to be incurred by [NAME] by reason of any requirement on [NAME] to comply with any relevant statute bye-laws regulations guidance or requirements of any competent authority such payment to be made without deduction or set
off .”
Insertion of Clause 3(f) “Subject to payment by [NAME] of all reasonable costs charges and expenses [NAME] agrees to comply with all orders notices bye-laws regulations guidance statutes or requirements of any competent authority requiring any inspection assessment alteration addition modification or any other work on or to the Building PROVIDED THAT this shall not operate to convey an obligation on [NAME] to do so.” Insertion of Clause 2(v)
“To the reasonable satisfaction in all respects of [NAME] [NAME]’s agent or surveyor keep the Building and all parts thereof and all additions thereto in a good and substantial state of repair maintenance and condition through the continuance of the Lease including the renewal and replacement of any parts of the Building that may be required and to comply with any statutes bye-law regulation guidance or any other requirement of any competent authority PROVIDED THAT if [NAME] shall at any time make default in the performance of any of the covenants hereinbefore contained relating to the compliance with any statute bye-law regulation guidance or any other requirement of any competent authority [NAME] may in its absolute discretion perform such services the cost thereof shall be a debt due from the payable to [NAME] on demand and forthwith recoverable by action.” Insertion of Clause 2(t) “To permit [NAME] or anyone acting on authority of [NAME] to enter upon the demised premises to carry out any inspection assessment or work which [NAME] is required to do by notice regulation guidance statutes bye-law or requirement of any competent authority.”
Current clause Variation of clause shown in red Clause 2(g) of the lease for 35A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Ground Floor Flat
At all time during the said term to pay and contribute (a) one equal half part of the expense of repairing maintaining and rebuilding the roof foundations and main structure of the building of which the demised premises form part (b) a rateable or due proportion of the expense of [NAME] repairing maintaining supporting rebuilding and cleansing all ways passageways pathways sewers drains pipes cisterns gutters party walls party structure fences easements and appurtenances belonging to or used or capable or being used by [NAME] in common with [NAME] or the tenants or occupiers of the premises
near to or adjoining the demised premises including the lower flat or of which the demised premises including the lower flat or of which the demised premises form part such proportion in the case of difference to be settled by the surveyor for the time being of [NAME] whose decision shall be binding and to keep [NAME] indemnified against all costs and expenses as aforesaid.
near to or adjoining the demised premises including the upper flat of which the demised premises form part such proportion in the case of difference to be settled by the surveyor for the time being of [NAME] whose decision shall be binding and to keep [NAME] indemnified against all costs and expenses as aforesaid Clause 2(g) of the lease for 35B [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] First Floor Flat
At all time during the said term to pay and contribute (a) one equal half part of the expense of repairing maintaining and rebuilding the roof foundations and main structure of the building of which the demised premises form part (b) a rateable or due proportion of the expense of [NAME] repairing maintaining supporting rebuilding and cleansing all ways passageways pathways sewers drains pipes cisterns gutters party walls party structure fences easements and appurtenances belonging to or used or capable or being used by [NAME] in common with [NAME] or the tenants or occupiers of the premises near to or adjoining the demised premises including the lower flat or of which the demised premises including the lower flat or of which the demised premises form part such proportion in the case of difference to be settled by the surveyor for the time being of [NAME] whose decision shall be binding and to keep [NAME] indemnified against all costs and expenses as aforesaid
At all time during the said term to pay and contribute (a) one equal half part of the expense of repairing maintaining and rebuilding the roof foundations and main structure of the building of which the demised premises form part (b) a rateable or due proportion of the expense of [NAME] repairing maintaining supporting rebuilding and cleansing all ways passageways pathways sewers drains pipes cisterns gutters party walls party structure fences easements and appurtenances belonging to or used or capable or being used by [NAME] in common with [NAME] or the tenants or occupiers of the premises near to or adjoining the demised premises including the lower flat or of which the demised premises form part such proportion in the case of difference to be settled by the surveyor for the time being of [NAME] whose decision shall be binding and to keep [NAME] indemnified against all costs and expenses as aforesaid
Clause 3(c) of the lease for 35B [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] First Floor Flat
That in the event of any sale of the upper flat such sale shall be effected by means of a grant of a lease of the same in the same or similar form to these presents (mutatis mutandis) and containing the like covenants on the part of [NAME] and exceptions and reservations and provisos as are herein contained and until such lease shall have been granted or in the event of any such lease being determined in any ways [NAME] hereby covenants with [NAME] and their successors in title that if [NAME] will observe and perform all the restrictions and covenants in respect of the
That in the event of any sale of the lower flat such sale shall be effected by means of a grant of a lease of the same in the same or similar form to these presents (mutatis mutandis) and containing the like covenants on the part of [NAME] and exceptions and reservations and provisos as are herein contained and until such lease shall have been granted or in the event of any such lease being determined in any ways [NAME] hereby covenants with [NAME] and their successors in title that if [NAME] will observe and perform all the restrictions and covenants in respect of the
lower flat for the time being or from time to time as if [NAME] were a tenant thereof subject to such like covenants exceptions reservations and provisos as are herein contained Provided that prior to any such sale of the flat or in the event of the lease granted on such sale being determined as aforesaid and prior to any re-sale of such flat [NAME] shall not be liable for any breach of the said covenants by an tenant or occupier for the time being of such flat so far as such tenant occupier is in breach if his or her tenancy agreement so long as [NAME] shall use its best endeavours to ensure that such tenant or occupier conforms to the terms upon which he or she holds such tenancy.
upper flat for the time being or from time to time as if [NAME] were a tenant thereof subject to such like covenants exceptions reservations and provisos as are herein contained Provided that prior to any such sale of the flat or in the event of the lease granted on such sale being determined as aforesaid and prior to any re-sale of such flat [NAME] shall not be liable for any breach of the said covenants by an tenant or occupier for the time being of such flat so far as such tenant occupier is in breach if his or her tenancy agreement so long as [NAME] shall use its best endeavours to ensure that such tenant or occupier conforms to the terms upon which he or she holds such tenancy.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Decides RTM Company Costs Under 2002 Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets RTM Costs Under Commonhold Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Boiler Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Retrospective Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Premium for New Lease Under Leasehold Reform…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Lease Extension Premium
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Collective Enfranchisement Granted Despite Missing Landlord
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Fire Alarm Installatio…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Unreasonable Service Charges
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal agreed to amend the leases to ensure satisfactory provision for matters under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
- The leases were deficient in fire safety, especially after the Grenfell tragedy, requiring greater emphasis on this aspect.
- The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, as amended, is relevant because the property contains two or more domestic premises.
- The variations would place obligations on parties to comply with statutory provisions and allow recovery of compliance costs.
- The tribunal was satisfied that the parties have responsibility under the Fire Safety Order and other relevant regulations.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal approved variations to leases under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 to address fire safety and statutory compliance issues.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenants were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to approve the variations to ensure compliance with fire safety regulations and statutory requirements.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, specifically section 35, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the need to update the leases to meet modern fire safety standards and statutory requirements.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider updating their leases to comply with current fire safety regulations and statutory requirements.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Documents submitted by the landlord and the tenants, including the leases and relevant statutory provisions, were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving lease variations and statutory compliance.
