VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination for a Property in Torquay

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for a property in Torquay. They considered the property's condition and compared it to similar properties in the area. The Tribunal decided on a rent of £550 per month, effective from November 17, 2021.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for its condition and comparable properties in the area.

Topics

market rent determinationassured tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the property's condition and local market comparables.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in Torquay, considering the property's condition and market comparables.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in Torquay, taking into account the property's condition and local market comparables. The Tribunal found that the property's condition warranted a lower rent than the proposed market rate.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0129

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 76b [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 63 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 550.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17 November 2021

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 17 July 2015

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises First floor flat comprising, Living Room, Kitchen, two Bedrooms, Bathroom with WC, off- street car space.

[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 23 December 2021

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0129 Property :

76b [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] :

[NAME]

Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] Miss C [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :

23rd December 2021

DECISION

CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0129

2

Summary of Decision

1. On 23rd December 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £550 per month to take effect from 17th November 2021.

Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 28th September 2021 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £600 per month in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 17th November 2021. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On 1st November the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.

6. The Tribunal issued directions on 15th November 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations and that the Tribunal would seek to view the property on the internet. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. Both parties submitted papers setting out their respective cases. The papers from the Landlord’s Agent arrived late by one day but the Agent also submitted an application to extend the deadline which was agreed to by the Tribunal. The papers were also copied to the other party.

8. As stated in the Directions, as no objection was received from either party, the Tribunal determined the case on 23rd December 2021 based on the documents received without an oral hearing. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a first floor flat in a converted end terraced property of three units. It is situated on a busy road within a mainly residential area approximately 1/2 mile from the seafront.

10. There are a number of local shops within reasonable distance and a wider range of amenities within the Torbay area.

11. The accommodation is described as including a Living Room, Kitchen, two double Bedrooms and a Bathroom with WC. It is accessed by an open external staircase.

CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0129

3 12. The accommodation has gas-fired central heating and double glazing. There is off -road parking. Submissions 13. The initial tenancy began on 17th July 2015 at a rent of £550. Carpets are provided by the Landlord who also states that a cooker and fridge are provided. The Tenant states that a fridge is not provided, neither is there a washing machine.

14. The Landlords Agent states that a rent for a two-bedroomed property in this area is in a range £675-£750 per month and provided the Tribunal with details of a two bedroomed maisonette in the same building recently let for £675 per month.

15. The Tenant provided the Tribunal with a detailed history of his occupation together with photographs and copies of six interim inspection reports of the property by the letting agents from 2015-2018 which also included photographs.

16. In his application the Tenant states that the carpets are old and worn. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal (1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement-

CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0129

4 (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

Consideration and Valuation 17. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

18. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.

19. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgment and knowledge of rental values in the Torbay area, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £725 per month.

20. However the property is not in a condition that would command such a rent and adjustments need to be made to this ‘open market’ rent to take

CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0129

5 account of the Tenant’s provision of some white goods, dated Kitchen and Bathroom fittings and the general condition which included dampness, rain penetration, old windows (including a broken handle in a bedroom), blown plaster, defective roof and overflowing gutters, rotten worktops and lack of maintenance to his external steps and to the shared driveway and boundary walls.

21. Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: Tenant’s provision of some white goods £20 Dated kitchen and bathroom £60 General disrepair as above £95

____ TOTAL £175

22. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination

23. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £550 per month. 24. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £550 per month should take effect from 17th November 2021, this being the date specified in the notice.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0129

6 3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord's notice to increase rent complied with legal requirements.
  • The Tribunal was able to decide the case fairly based on the submitted papers without an oral hearing.
  • The property's market rent, if in usual condition, would be £725 per month.
  • Adjustments were made to the market rent due to the tenant providing some white goods.
  • Adjustments were made for the dated kitchen and bathroom fittings.
  • Adjustments were made for the general disrepair, including dampness and a defective roof.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the market rent for a property in Torquay at £550 per month.

Who was involved?

The case involved a landlord and a tenant.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local market comparables.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that the property's condition warranted a lower rent was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their property is well-maintained to avoid rent reductions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and inspection reports of the property were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.