VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Set at £510 per Month for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a new market rent of £510 per month for a property under an assured tenancy, effective from 22 July 2024. This decision was based on evidence presented by both the landlord and the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

market rent determinationassured tenancysection 14 Housing Act 1988

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers the open market conditions and disregards certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new market rent for a property under an assured tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property under an assured tenancy to be £510 per month, effective from 22 July 2024, considering comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference : CAM/42UD/MNR/2024/0087

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 7a Sir [APPELLANT] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 22 July 2024 Hearing Remote on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

The market rent is £510 per month with effect from 22 July 2024.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT S E C FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background

1. On 12 April 2024 the tenant referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

2. The landlord's notice, which was served on 12 March 2024, proposed a rent of £510 per month with effect from 1 May 2024 in place of the existing rent of £410 per month. 3. The tenant occupies under the terms of a tenancy for six months from 1 May 2018 at £410 per month.

4. Directions were issued by the tribunal on 22 May 2024.

5. Prior to the hearing both the landlord and the tenant sent submissions to the tribunal and the other party. The Evidence 6. The accommodation comprises a studio flat within an annexe to the main house situated opposite Ipswich Town football club.

7. The landlord stated that when let the studio was in good condition. A new central heating boiler had been installed in 2023. He was not aware of any outstanding repairs.

8. He referred to a number of lettings within house shares at rents above the figure he was asking and asserted that a studio was a more attractive option. The rents of the rooms in house shares included some bills, which was not comparable with the subject terms.

9. The tenant stated that the studio was damp and provided photographs showing mould on the walls. He stated that he had served notice on the landlord as he was moving into social housing. He was on Universal credit and asked that any increase not be backdated because he could not afford to may any consequential arrears. The law

10. In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 I proceeded to determine the rent at which I considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

11. In so doing I, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act or any diminution in value due to the tenant not complying with the terms of the tenancy and also any items of disrepair which either the tenant had not reported to the

3 landlord or had not allowed access for the landlord to carry out the necessary repairs.

Valuation

12. In coming to my decision, I relied on the landlord’s comparable evidence together with my own general knowledge of rents in the Ipswich. However, it is clear that the flat is not in the condition which is usual for an open market letting.

13. I determined that the open market rent of the property if modernised and let on the terms which usually apply to an Assured Shorthold letting would be £510 per month. The decision 14. The rent of £510 per month is effective from 22 July 2024 as I have exercised my discretion under section 14 (7) since I am satisfied that backdating the increase would cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: [NAME]: 22 July 2024

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

I. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-[NAME]-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper- tribunal-lands-chamber II. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

III. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

IV. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.

Appendix Housing Act 1988

14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee.

4 (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and

5 (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements…. (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.

6

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber CAM/42UD/MNR/2024/ 0087

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of PremisesThe Tribunal members were 7a Sir [NAME] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 11[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: 510 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 22 July 2024

*3. The amount included for services /is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 November 2018 6. Length of the term or rental period monthly 7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 applies

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

7

9. Description of premises Studio flat in annexe attached to main house, opposite Ipswich football stadium..

Chairman E [NAME] of Decision 22 July 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Tenant entitled to a market rent determination under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • Tenant entitled to a market rent determination that reflects the property's condition and modernisation needs.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new market rent of £510 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The landlord and the tenant were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the condition of the property and comparable rents was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a market rent determination if they disagree with their landlord's proposed rent increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs showing the condition of the property and comparable evidence from the landlord were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.