Market Rent Set at £675 per Month by First-tier Tribunal
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent of £675 per month for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the current state of the property and the tenant's ability to pay the rent.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a reasonable market rent assessment that considers the current condition of the property and the tenant's ability to pay.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable open-market rent based on the current condition of the property and the terms of the existing tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a market rent of £675 per month, effective from 27 November 2023, considering the current conditions and the tenant's financial situation.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal assessed a market rent of £675 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the current condition of the property and the tenant's financial situation. The decision took effect from 27 November 2023.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AZ/MNR/2023/0329
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 73 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge Robert Latham Alison Flynn MA MRICS
Landlord [NAME] 39A, [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 675.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 27 November 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable N/A Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 27 June 2017
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Furnished
9. Description of premises Room in an HMO with five rooms
Chairman Judge Robert Latham Date of Decision 1 December 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AZ/MNR/2023/0329 Property : 73 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Landlord :
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
Tenant : [APPELLANT] [NAME] of Application : Assessment of Market Rent sections 13 & 14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Judge Robert Latham Alison Flynn MA MRICS Date and venue of Determination : 1 December 2023 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
DECISION AND SUMMARY REASONS
The Tribunal determines a market rent of £675 per month. The increase will take effect from 27 November 2023.
Background
1. On 24 June 2023, the tenant issued an application referring a notice proposing a new rent under an assured periodic tenancy to the Tribunal pursuant to section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”). On 18 June 2023, the landlord had served a notice pursuant to section 13(2) of the Act proposing a new rent of £775 per month in place of the existing rent of £600 pm with effect from 27 July 2023. The tenancy commenced on 27 June 2017.
The Hearing and Inspection
2. The Tribunal held a hearing, by video, attended by Mr [NAME], Mrs [NAME], and her son Mr [NAME]. Mr [NAME] stated that he would prefer that Mrs [NAME] should not attend the inspection; she agreed to this. The Tribunal
2 stressed that the purpose of the inspection was merely to see the room and the property. No evidence would be taken.
3. The property at [ADDRESS] is a two storey semi-detached house with a loft conversion. This is an HMO with five rooms. The tenant of the room in the loft conversion has an ensuite bathroom. The four other tenants share a bathroom on the first floor and a toilet on the ground floor. All the tenants share a kitchen. The rent includes gas, electricity, water, internet and council tax.
4. Mr [NAME] has not paid any rent increase since the commencement of the tenancy in 2017. It was apparent that there is some antagonism between the parties. The other tenants have agreed to cost of living increases. The landlady has redecorated the other rooms and supplied new flooring. Mr [NAME] was not willing to grant access for these works to be executed. He would have had to move to a smaller room whilst the works were executed. On 20 September 2023, Mrs [NAME] served a Notice Seeking Possession.
5. [NAME] occupies the master bedroom on the first floor. The living room on the ground floor is now used as a bedroom. This is similar in size to Mr [NAME] room. This room is occupied by Mr [NAME] who pays a rent of £700 pm. The Tribunal inspected this room. It has been decorated and has new flooring. By contrast, there is a worn and dirty carpet in the room occupied by Mr [NAME].
The Law
6. Section 14 of the Act requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which the dwelling can reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy: (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;
(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;
(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and
(d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. 7. In making a determination under this section, the Tribunal shall disregard: (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;
(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement:
3
(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or
(ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and
(c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Assessment of the Market Rent
8. In reaching our determination, the Tribunal has had regard to our expert knowledge and general knowledge of rental values in the area. The Tribunal first determined the market rent which the landlord could reasonably expect to obtain for the room in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. We assessed this at £700 month.
9. It is difficult to value [NAME] as so much depends upon the arrangements in the relevant properties. However, we are satisfied that the downstairs room occupied by Mr [NAME] is the best comparable. He pays £700 per month. However, the landlord has redecorated this room and provided new flooring. The Tribunal therefore makes a reduction of £25 to reflect this and assesses a market rent for the room at £675 per month.
10. Mr [NAME] is a musician. He was made redundant during Covid-19. He is in receipt of universal credit, which leaves him with a significant shortfall in his housing costs. He will find it difficult to meet the increase and has been looking for alternative accommodation. Any increase would normally take effect from the new period specified in the notice of increase. However, the tribunal is satisfied that this would cause undue hardship to the tenant. Section 14(7) of the Act gives the Tribunal a discretion in these circumstances to specify a later date (not being later than the date of our determination). We therefore specify that the increase shall take effect from 27 November 2023.
Judge Robert Latham 1 December 2023
Rights of Appeal
1. You can only appeal this rent determination if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law.
4 2. These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
3. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Statutory Periodic Tena…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Refurbished Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set for Assured Periodic Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined a market rent of £675 per month for the room.
- The landlord's redecoration and new flooring in a comparable room justified a rent reduction for the tenant's room.
- The tenant's financial hardship from being made redundant during Covid-19 allowed the rent increase to be delayed.
- The rent increase was delayed to November 27, 2023, to prevent undue hardship to the tenant.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £675 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a landlord and a tenant in an assured periodic tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current condition of the property and the tenant's financial situation.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the tenant's financial situation and the current condition of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent assessment considering their financial situation.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and the tenant's financial situation were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if there are grounds to challenge the legal reasoning.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to consult a solicitor for legal advice and representation.
