VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £105 weekly rent for assured tenancy in Manchester

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and the services provided to the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, taking into account the condition of the property and the services provided, as seen in this case involving a semi-detached house requiring upgrades.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent for the property, considering factors like the property's condition and services provided.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £105.00 per week, excluding certain charges but including service costs.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, considering the property's condition and the services provided.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/30UD/MNR/2023/0421

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 30 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 105.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 02 October 2023

3. The amount included for services is £2.06 Per week

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 15 April 2020

5. Rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per landlord and tenant act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Nil

8. Description of premises The property is a two storey semi detached house built in the 1950s. Ground floor accommodation comprises whole living room and kitchen with a WC on a half landing. On the first floor there are two double bedrooms, one single bedroom and a bathroom/WC. There is an extensive rear garden and a smaller one to the front. It is understood that at the start of the tenancy the property was of a poor standard and requiring upgrading. The tenant’s works included replastering the living room, kitchen and back bedroom, replacing the internal doors, tiling the kitchen floor and replacing part of the fence to the rear garden.

[NAME] of Decision 7 February 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property was a two-story semi-detached house built in the 1950s.
  • The tenant carried out significant upgrades to the property, including replastering and replacing doors.
  • The determined rent for the property is £105.00 per week.
  • The amount included for services in the rent is £2.06 per week.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £105.00 per week, excluding water rates and council tax but including service costs.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy, specifically whether it should be set at £105.00 per week.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £105.00 per week, excluding water rates and council tax but including service costs, based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to set the rent at £105.00 per week.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set according to their request.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

For someone in a similar situation, the decision means that the rent can be set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.